|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
hang a left (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 10:39 PM Original message |
IMO We cheapen our argument when we compare Libby to Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. You Make An Excellent Point, Ma'am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yes. Libby's lies were about the nation not his penis. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. How many DU subject lines will bring up Clinton's name with Libby's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 10:50 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Well I haven't been here much today...sorry if I offended you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 10:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. No, the remark wasn't to you personally, and it didn't offend me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. Nobody died when Clinton lied..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
5. Uh, CLINTON DID NOT COMMIT PERJURY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 10:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Uh, he was charged with perjury and he had a trial in the senate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 10:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. OK, give us the RESULTS of that trial, thank you n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gumby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 11:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Neo-con response: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 11:06 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Why are you advocating the neocon response? This is DU, after all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gumby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 11:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Well, that was unpleasant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 12:30 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. No, you should inform them that he was not convicted of perjury. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gumby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 12:54 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
9. Imo, the only folks bringing up Clinton are repukes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 11:10 PM Original message |
You and I are on the same page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 11:10 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Dupe sorry, tricky mouse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
punpirate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 11:26 PM Response to Original message |
14. Perhaps you misinterpret recent posts on this matter... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-30-05 11:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. The punpirate has a brilliantly compelling point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC