Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Think Progress begins a series -- "Indictment Dissected"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 06:47 PM
Original message
Think Progress begins a series -- "Indictment Dissected"
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 06:49 PM by understandinglife
Part 1:

Indictment Dissected: Cheney’s Role


There are a few instances in the indictments that point to a larger role that Dick Cheney may have played in the leak. Here are some examples:

1. Libby was “advised by the Vice President” that “Wilson’s wife worked” at the CIA in the Counterproliferation Division (see #9). The verb “advised by” is oddly-placed and echoes language from fact #16 when Libby “advises” Ari Fleischer about Plame’s identity. The verb seems to be synonymous with “instructed.” This discussion, referenced in fact #9, follows a staff meeting in the VP’s office the preceding day (see #8) in which Wilson was discussed. Was Cheney trying to emphasize what he saw as the most strategic attack to Pincus’s column?

<clip>

More at the link:

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/29/indictment-dissected-cheneys-role


Part 2:

Indictment Dissected: Libby’s Knowledge of Plame’s Covert Identity

This is the second part of a Think Progress series breaking down the significance of the Libby indictment.

In at least three instances, it appears from the facts outlined in the indictments that Libby was aware that Valerie Plame was an undercover CIA agent.

1. Libby spoke to his Principal Deputy about an article in The New Republic and discussed whether they could share information about the role of Wilson’s wife in sending him to Niger. “Libby responded that there would be complications at the CIA in disclosing that information publicly, and that he could not discuss the matter on a non-secure telephone line.” (see #14)

<clip>

More at the link, including interesting comments:

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/29/indictment-dissected-libbys-knowledge-of-plames-covert-identity


Think Progress link to full text of indictment:

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/28/libby-indictments

As they add new categories, I'll post links in comments to this OP.

Here's a link to their comment form; you may want to send them a 'thank you' for all their efforts:

http://thinkprogress.org/contact


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC