Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maureen Dowd: Who's On First? (10/29 column)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:16 PM
Original message
Maureen Dowd: Who's On First? (10/29 column)
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 11:17 PM by highplainsdem
http://oakparkgirl.blogspot.com/2005/10/whos-on-first.html


Who's On First?

October 29, 2005
Op-Ed Columnist
By MAUREEN DOWD
WASHINGTON

It was bracing to see the son of a New York doorman open the door on the mendacious Washington lair of the Lord of the Underground.

But this Irish priest of the law, Patrick Fitzgerald, neither Democrat nor Republican, was very strict, very precise. He wasn't totally gratifying in clearing up the murkiness of the case, yet strangely comforting in his quaint black-and-white notions of truth and honor (except when his wacky baseball metaphor seemed to veer toward a "Who's on first?" tangle).

<snip>

But what we really want to know, now that we have the bare bones of who said what to whom in the indictment, is what they were all thinking there in that bunker and how that hothouse bred the idea that the way out of their Iraq problems was to slime their critics instead of addressing the criticism. What we really want to know, if Scooter testifies in the trial, and especially if he doesn't, is what Vice did to create the spidery atmosphere that led Scooter, who seemed like an interesting and decent guy, to let his zeal get the better of him.

<snip>

Vice spent so much time lurking over at the C.I.A., trying to intimidate the analysts at Langley into twisting the intelligence about weapons, that he should have had one of his undisclosed locations there.

<snip>



Another great column...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. she has a long piece coming Sunday... see post below at:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Thanks for the heads up! Here's the link to that:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/magazine/30feminism.html?hp


Just finished reading it. Very thoughtful, and very saddening (despite her usual wit).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. MoDo has such a way with words
"...Mr. Cheney, eager to be rid of the meddlesome Joe Wilson, got Valerie Wilson's name from the C.I.A. and passed it on to Scooter. He forced the C.I.A. to compromise one of its own, a sacrifice on the altar of faith-based intelligence."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Great column, but ...
I actually thought that the baseball metaphor was a terrific way to simplify the process. It put it into terms that the average person could understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. yes, I thought it made the point very well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ROH Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, the baseball metaphor was very good (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I also liked the baseball metaphor.
It provided visual imagery that anyone who has ever seen a baseball game could follow. And I liked the metaphor of the baseball hitting someone in the head, which is exactly what the administration did to Valerie Plame and Brewster-Jennings.

Sometimes MoDo is a dodo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. I agree, it worked very well
I'm hardly a baseball fan but in this case I was more than happy to hear someone ramble about a hypothetical beanball. Fitzgerald is apparently a lifelong baseball fan, first the Mets then switching to the Cubs, according to Olbermann.

The only problem I had with the analogy was normally you know exactly why the pitcher throws at the batter, since any bad blood between the individuals or teams is highly publicized. Plus many beanings occur immediately after something happens in a previous inning or at bat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. MoDo is worth a bump.
Recommended and kicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. ... seemed like an interesting and decent guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Exactly. I'm thinking the same thing....
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Maybe she "fancied him".
She's entitled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. Maureen is great. She hammered Judas Miller.
Here's my Who's on first? comic from last week.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's hilarious. LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Thanks. Here was the follow-up, which exploited that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. only when it became ok to do so.
did she criticize Miller in print at all when it mattered, during 2002-3?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. When the NY Times signaled it was ok, Dowd cut loose.
She never would have done so otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I think she was waiting for the right time.
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 12:50 AM by Carolab
From Dowd's "Woman of Mass Destruction" piece:

"I've always liked Judy Miller. I have often wondered what Waugh or Thackeray would have made of the Fourth Estate's Becky Sharp.

The traits she has that drive many reporters at The Times crazy - her tropism toward powerful men, her frantic intensity and her peculiar mixture of hard work and hauteur - have never bothered me. I enjoy operatic types.

Once when I was covering the first Bush White House, I was in The Times's seat in the crowded White House press room, listening to an administration official's background briefing. Judy had moved on from her tempestuous tenure as a Washington editor to be a reporter based in New York, but she showed up at this national security affairs briefing.

At first she leaned against the wall near where I was sitting, but I noticed that she seemed agitated about something. Midway through the briefing, she came over and whispered to me, "I think I should be sitting in the Times seat."

It was such an outrageous move, I could only laugh. I got up and stood in the back of the room, while Judy claimed what she felt was her rightful power perch."

**********

Sounds to me like Judy had a bit more "protection" at the Times than did Dowd. Maureen wouldn't have jeopardized her own career by attacking Judy in print until the Times own management came down on her too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
18. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. Great!! She also captures perfectly the Orwellian nature of this
mal-Administration:

"This administration's grand schemes always end up as the opposite. Officials say they're promoting national security when they're hurting it; they say they're squelching terrorists when they're breeding them; they say they're bringing stability to Iraq when the country's imploding. (The U.S. announced five more military deaths yesterday.)"--Maureen Dowd, same column
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC