Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One down, 21 more to go

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:18 PM
Original message
One down, 21 more to go
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 10:26 PM by Quixote1818
I think the reason Libby was the only one indicted is simple. Fitzgerald probably had to work his ass off to meet the deadline of the expiring grand jury and indict someone to show those two years of work were for something. Perhaps a month ago he may have decided he had to chose the person he had the best case against. He might have bantered back and fourth between Rove and Libby then finally decided he would focus on Libby for this first indictment. Now that Libby is done he can finish putting the finishing touches on Rove, present his case to the new grand jury, indict him and move on to the next victim.


Why indict everyone at once and risk leaving holes in your case when you can work on one person at a time? Lets face it, the ONLY significance of this date was the expiring Grand Jury and NOT the end of Fitzgerald's case.

These ass holes have muddied the waters so badly Fitzgerald has to work his ass off and cover every tiny detail before he feels comfortable making an indictment. It's possible Fitz just likes to focus on one case at a time. After all, as someone pointed out he eventually indicted 60 people in a case that started with just one indictment.

We can read all kinds of strategy into this but in the end it may just come down to use of time and organizational skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Libby was indicted, because his name sounds like Liberal
He was a bad apple in WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, 'cause it's just like Liddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Of course! The dyslexia rule!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. He basically said as much in his statements.
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 10:45 PM by Carolab
"Look, when we investigate things we're always going out and doing things. I'm not going to do a time line. We obviously wanted to get as much done before October 28th as we could. I would have loved to have finished the case completely by October 28th. This grand jury served long and hard and was very, very attentive. We're grateful for their service.

So I wanted to get as much accomplished before October 28th, but I wouldn't read anything beyond that. I'm not going to comment on any discussions we had with any counsel."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. And don 't forget . . .
. . . there is the little fact of the new and larger office space Fitz rented. Why would he do that if there weren't some bigger fish in the pond to catch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He is going to need an office that is 21 times bigger than the one
he has now. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I read that The Washington Note retracted that bit of information. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC