Under Libby's lies - smokescreen for some underhanded dealings?
After Sept. 11, the Italian intelligence service showed the documents to the CIA without disclosing their dubious origins, according to La Repubblica. Berlusconi met with President Bush in the White House on Oct. 15, 2001. In what La Repubblica concedes might be a coincidence, the CIA started circulating the forged Niger documents to other Washington agencies the next day.
Later in 2001, Italian operatives passed the same documents to British intelligence via Richard Dearlove, the Italian paper says.
By the summer of 2002, Pollari knew the documents were forged and the credibility of their source dubious, according to La Repubblica, but never said anything to his British and American counterparts. As The Post reported in July 2003, the International Atomic Energy Agency concluded in March 2003 that the documents were forged......
There is one important difference between the DSM and La Repubblica stories. The Downing Street Memo itself did not identify the U.S. officials with whom Dearlove met in the summer of 2002. The La Repubblica series is more specific. It raises the question of whether Hadley deliberately circulated false information about Saddam's nuclear activities after his meeting with Pollari in September 2002.
Did U.S. officials intentionally "fix" intelligence reports with false information as a way to hype the danger of Iraq to the American public? And more specifically, did Stephen Hadley do the fixing?
http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/worldopinionroundup/http://www.repubblica.it/2005/j/sezioni/esteri/iraq69/sismicia/sismicia.html (translate using Babelfish) Altavista)