|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:12 PM Original message |
If Fitzgerald was Ken Starr would we have some REAL results? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
1. Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Right. What's national security as compared to ejaculate security? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. True |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. That is a crime indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. Ken Starr produced no real results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Um, the fucking President of the United States was impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:17 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. That was congress. They did it in SPITE of Starr's failure to find a crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I suppose you could say that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. No, but that accuracy thing is a big point with me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:31 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Rock on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. The Repubs were going to hang him on anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:22 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Exactly - so WE had a REAL case. And we got bupkis! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. We do have a real case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:28 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I know I just said we did. I wasn't being sarcastic this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A Simple Game (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 06:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Starr didn't "find" that Clinton had sex with his mistress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. If he was Ken Starr he could basically make up charges. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. I 'm repeatedly smacking myself in the forehead! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LVdem (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
8. Yeah...a blue dress!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadparrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
13. Yeah, the president was impeached... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Ok. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ready4Change (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
18. And a hell of a lot of FAKE results as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChavezSpeakstheTruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-28-05 05:30 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. True. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:09 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC