Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Fitzgerald was Ken Starr would we have some REAL results?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:12 PM
Original message
If Fitzgerald was Ken Starr would we have some REAL results?
Hmmm?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure
After 70 million more dollars and 5 more years.

But hey...this was no blow job, this was just some stupid treason type shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right. What's national security as compared to ejaculate security?
I mean really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. True
And Libby only helped ruin some careers and could have possibly ruined more lives if not put people in real danger.

Clinton fucking ruined a blue dress. A DAMNED fine looking blue dress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. That is a crime indeed.
That cigar business though - that's inspired!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ken Starr produced no real results
He wrote a porn story that cost $50 million. Fitz's investigation has cost only $700,000 thus far. It would have been a lot less if the reporters Cooper and Miller talked earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Um, the fucking President of the United States was impeached.
That's "no results"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That was congress. They did it in SPITE of Starr's failure to find a crime
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I suppose you could say that.
But it doesn't change the irony of the present situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. No, but that accuracy thing is a big point with me.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Rock on.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. The Repubs were going to hang him on anything
It was an attempted coup.
Starr spent $50 million and all he could find was that Clinton lied about sex with his mistress.
Starr was supposed to be investigating Whitewater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Exactly - so WE had a REAL case. And we got bupkis!
I mean, for real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. We do have a real case
and Fitz is not finished yet. In the immortal words of Yogi Berra, "It ain't over till it's over."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I know I just said we did. I wasn't being sarcastic this time.
So I'll hang in but I surely am not celebrating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Starr didn't "find" that Clinton had sex with his mistress.
That information was given to him by Whats her name(I'm terrible at remembering names). He then shared it with Broderick's lawyers, if I recall correctly. That is where the perjury charge originated from.

I could be wrong, I do suffer from CRS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. If he was Ken Starr he could basically make up charges.
Then we could technically have a huge number of indictments, but none of them would go anywhere. Yahoooo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I 'm repeatedly smacking myself in the forehead!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVdem Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah...a blue dress!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah, the president was impeached...
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 05:22 PM by deadparrot
and his approval ratings were in the 60s. The bullshit that was the Lewinsky fiasco didn't fool people.

Give me an honest prosecutor who keeps his GJ proceedings airtight.

Also, you assume it's over. When Fitzgerald says it's over, it's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Ok. Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. And a hell of a lot of FAKE results as well.
And a lot of totally unrelated investigations and smear campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC