It would have been doubly devastating for BushCo to have both Libby & Rove indicted on the same day.
I'm sure that Rove's attorney figured out a way to stall his client's indictment... probably by dangling some tidbit of evidence (like notes) or something else.
6. I've thought of that as well. According to the report about the meeting
Rove's attorney (Luskin)said something/gave something to Fitz that changed his mind about indicting Rove today. Supposedly Fitz was leaning toward an indictment and then backed away from it after this meeting.This made me wonder if he was giving new info in the case.
I also heard the term "reminded" Fitz of something and then my mind started racing about threats and/or manipulation, but I'm not sure they could be that brave.
8. Probably gave Fitz the info on Wilson making a speech & in his bio
making reference to his wife's name (though not her job). Someone mentioned that recently.
Don't know if it is true - but if Wilson did that - the original charge of "her cover been blown" might be on shaky ground.. ergo... the conspiracy charge had to be dropped.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.