5. No just that proving whodunnit is too hard (suspects tend not to cooperate
and when witnesses not under suspicion have everything to lose by ratting they tend not to cooperate either) and furthermore the crime committed isn't against her, but against statute law like the IIPA or the Espionage Act.
but to me that says the investigation will be quite thorough. I can't imagine this guy throwing his hands in the air and indicting only on the cover-up.
15. Thanks. I'm going crazy. It reminds me of 2000, Floridian voters
disenfranchised and as a consequence, the people of the United States disenfranchised, and the whoring SCOTUS tainting the strict interpretation of the constitutional laws that they so admire themselves for.
They got away with all of that. I hope they don't do it again.
19. Sounds to me like they know there was a conspiracy to reveal her.
MsNBC is saying they know of all of these "confidential" conversations Libby had with others about Plame and to shut down Wilson. How can they not indict for conspiracy?
This is really just the beginning. Fitz xould not issue an indictment such he did today without getting to the heart of the matter. The indictment today establishes that a crime was committed (disclosure of classified information). Obviously, Fitz has to continue up the line. The first raodblock (Libby) has been cleared. This is going to get very ugly for the illegitimate administration.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.