Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What would be the advantage of Turd's lawyer leaking he's getting off

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:34 PM
Original message
What would be the advantage of Turd's lawyer leaking he's getting off
if he actually isn't getting off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's what all high-publicity-case defense lawyers say. Always!
Look at how T. Delay is trying to reputationally throw-down Ronnie Earl in the press. They'd be attacking Fitz personally and reputationally too if they weren't worried that he had them by the short ones. (They're a slight bit smarter than Delay)

Gyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It just seems hollow
Desperate. If he's not trying to smear Fitz a la Delay in his case, then I still can't see why they would leak this. Especially if he's going down tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pushing a meme, so that the public...
... when he's indicted, will tend to think that the prosecutor is just being vindictive.

It's all a PR game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Okay
I think I can see that. Convince the public via the most trusted paper, the NYT, that he's getting off, then when Fitz indicts it looks like he was messing with him, or maybe being too harsh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. An attempt to control the story as long as possible. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Or maybe Rove is busting at the seams, trying to decide...
whether he's going to squeal and cop a plea. The eleventh hour approaches. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. He's still got to defend himself
If Rove didn't actually get a "target letter" (which isn't required), his lawyer could say "They told us he wouldn't be indicted, that there wasn't enough evidence. But then the prosecutor went and indicted him anyway! He is reckless and brought this baseless charge knowing that there wasn't really enough evidence, in an attempt to justify his investigation. I am shocked. Shocked!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. My little mind
has trouble keeping up with the chess match. I just hope to God Patrick Fitzgerald's genius outsmarts criminal genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe it's Libby's lawyer talking to the Times.
He would know for sure re: the Libby indictment.

I really believe that Fitzgerald alone knows what is going to happen tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. To make Fitz seem like a mean double crosser
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 11:51 PM by Jersey Devil
My client was cooperating! He went before the GJ four times voluntarily. He told the truth and had nothing to hide. The mean prosecutor twisted his words to try to make him look like a liar because he has a political agenda. He stabbed my client in the back and he was only trying to tell the truth.

That's how it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. To soften the blow, when he is...........
they like trying to get the ball in their court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. Spin, Spin, Spin, Spin, Spin.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC