|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:51 PM Original message |
It has been over 100 yrs that a sitting WH staff got indicted. Norah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gabi Hayes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. how long since a sitting Veep got indicted? not very |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. She was wondering if they would resign tonight? or why not let go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. Said it would be unusual for for Rove or libby or whomever to be on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Norah saying all others had resigned or told to go before indictments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Then there was a brief discussion of all the scenaries that are being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. There was also some discussion about how the WH would defend them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
4. Norah-talk about a tool. I've come to despise her. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe for Clark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
6. She is technically correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Thanks for the verification. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Halliburton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
7. I CAN'T STAND WHORA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
9. A distinction with little difference. Corruption in the seat of power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:57 PM Original message |
Yeah, well, we've never made it to Hurricane Alpha before, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
11. I saw it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. or maybe they will not be indicted? the possibility exists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 05:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. It would be a long 3 years if this happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
14. This will be the FIRST time officials in the WH and in Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 05:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Watergate was entirely isolated to the WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe for Clark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 05:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Boy he sure is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
18. Nixon and Reagan weren't that long ago. Not nearly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
19. Agnew? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe for Clark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 05:17 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. No, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-27-05 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
21. Fine. Let All the Chimperor's Men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:45 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC