Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why didn't Bush wait for same day as indictment to withdraw Miers?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:26 AM
Original message
Why didn't Bush wait for same day as indictment to withdraw Miers?
Would it have looked too obvious or did they think it was going to be today? And the Miers story would detract somewhat from the indictments, especially within his own base. But, we could guess that if the indictments come out tomorrow, the right-wing will be more interested in discussing who they want next on the Court, rather than the CIA Leak story? So, this is a good detraction for the Republicans, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. he's dumb. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. maybe he did.
the day is young.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. so he can make an anouncement of a new nominee in the midst of the
Fitz announcements. devide the media attention--and ours. smart move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanOfWhoopAss Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. The wacko replacement nominee is slated for that time slot. Along with...
The ensuing filibuster nuclear option debate as a result of the wingnut nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. So the Democrats should be putting out the message .....
that he should pick a moderate woman for the Court? That cuts their options for right-wingers by 50% - simply by insisting on a woman candidate. But, that would be better than a Theodore Olsen. So Democrats should start insisting that the president should look for a competent and moderate woman for the Court. That would be the smart politcal move right now, but they should insist that he not put up any right-wingers like Janice Rogers Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. He's trigger happy
jumped the gun, so we best watch out, for what is coming next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ed murrow Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. Its all about being below the fold
Fitzgerald will release his findings on Friday when every paper is still talking about Miers

And by the weekend we will forget anything ever happened

It was just a bad dream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Tomorrow, he's going to
Edited on Thu Oct-27-05 10:40 AM by zidzi
"survey" the hurricane sights..that should be good for some photo ops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. I firmly believe they thought it would be today.......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOHICA06 Donating Member (886 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. Because he knows ....
there won't be any indictments and wants to see the MSM feed on itself all weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-05 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Because he's a strong & resolute leader......
Because he has "political capital & he's going to spend it"...
Because he is a "uniter, not a divider"....
Because "social security is bankrupt"...
Because of the "mission accomplished"...
Because "You're doing a heck of a job Brownie"....
Etc., etc., etc.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC