Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It Seems Like rOVER's Name Has Been Mentioned Less Lately

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:33 PM
Original message
It Seems Like rOVER's Name Has Been Mentioned Less Lately
More on Scooter and Cheney. What does that mean? Just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. LA TIMES: Fitzgerald Focuses Again on Rove
Edited on Wed Oct-26-05 01:37 PM by emulatorloo
back later w link

OK BYE! http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-102505leak_lat,0,6685030,print.story?coll=la-home-headlines

Fitzgerald Focuses Again on Rove
By Tom Hamburger, Richard B. Schmitt and Peter Wallsten
Times Staff Writers

<snip>
6:14 PM PDT, October 25, 2005

WASHINGTON — Prosecutors investigating the leak of a CIA agent's identity returned their attention to powerful White House advisor Karl Rove on Tuesday, questioning a former West Wing colleague about contacts Rove had with reporters in the days leading to the outing of a covert CIA officer.

Special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald also dispatched FBI agents to comb the CIA officer's residential neighborhood in Washington, asking neighbors again whether they were aware — before her name appeared in a syndicated column — that the agent, Valerie Plame, worked for the CIA.

The questioning, described by lawyers familiar with the case and by the neighbors, occurred as Fitzgerald was thought to be readying indictments in the long-running inquiry into the leak of Plame's identity.

The inquiry, which has reached deep into the White House and could come to an end this week, focused initially on determining who leaked the agent's name to reporters. More recent, Fitzgerald has appeared to turn his attention to possible perjury, obstruction of justice or conspiracy to violate laws prohibiting the distribution of classified secrets.

Snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rove is more effective in diverting attention away from himself.
I don't think the amount of attention Rove is getting means anything inside a courtroom.

Indeed, there may be players who we have no knowledge of that end up being implicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ed murrow Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. I heard it come up today
I really think the struggle between the CIA and Cheney's office makes the most sense. I hate Karl Rove but he is usually just a slime ball during elections.

But today sounded quite good for a dual idictment of Libby & Rove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ed murrow Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think Libby will resign tomorrow
Will the Undergorund present me an award if I am right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. see also WP: Rove's Last Campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. More a case of you haven't noticed. . .
than he's escaped notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC