|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:05 PM Original message |
Scarborough is going nuts! Lawrence O'Donnell is on, too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deadparrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. Details, for those of us without TV access? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. Are they talking about the NYT story about Cheney's involvement? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quakerfriend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. They just don't want to be on the loosing side when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DanCa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. Is that why tucker's been flip flooping around on issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. They're talking about the times report that Cheney was involved n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
5. Scarborough is desperate for this to be a non-issue! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
6. Tucker Carlson is still a twit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinksrival (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. HaHaHa!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. Tucker was blaming Fitzgerald for allegedly leaking information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
7. "the people around Scooter Libby are now giving up the Vice President" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
8. Fineman says people around Scooter are giving up Cheney... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:13 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Time for Cheney's other knee to have a heart attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peekaloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. If they're eager to give up Cheney it means they're worried for the Chimp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
9. Fineman can't keep a straight face during the "talking points" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
11. Fineman: Georgie feels like a very isolated man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
12. "George must feel like a very lonely man" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catmother (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
14. scarborough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
15. overview - panel felt it was a political bombshell for Cheney and the WH, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:26 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I don't understand that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. hmm, i never thought of that, Cheney actually telling the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:39 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. If Cheney and Libby discussed Plame AMONG THEMSELVES, it was no crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. You are correct. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:45 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. I'm inclined to believe Libby's falling on the proverbial sword... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:48 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. It was a crime if Cheney had reason to know Libby would talk to the press |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quixote1818 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:51 PM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Here is the possible crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:53 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Another possibility... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. The meeting was before Wilson's OpEd, so I guess Cheney could present |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 09:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. it was just a chat with bush and cheney right? no oath |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC