|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:52 PM Original message |
Patrick Fitzgerald is NOT the prosecutor against Ken Lay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. Woo Hoo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 03:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Um, I said he's NOT the prosecutor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. Ok but I did understand that Ken Lay has been indicted, right. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 04:11 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. He was indicted on July 7, 2004. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 04:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Oh, ok I am slow but then your point is that Fitz was not the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 04:39 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Yes, it was stated erroneously by a caller to the Ed schultz show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
6. Maybe the confusion comes from this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-24-05 04:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I'd say it was a rumor started by the Rethugs myself. n.t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC