Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

STILL No News On The Torture Photos? WTF?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:56 PM
Original message
STILL No News On The Torture Photos? WTF?
Still nothing on the ACLU or in the media. I just do not get it. What the hell is going on here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rebel_with_a_cause Donating Member (933 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for keeping tabs
I'm very interested as well in getting the truth out to the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I Just Wish There Were Some Tabs To Keep.
Very odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebel_with_a_cause Donating Member (933 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. We know there are more damning photos out there
and we've known that for well over a year.

It's now time to hand 'em over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_J Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Still curious...

I asked about this a couple days ago and got no response. There was a rumor that an executive order will make it impossible to ever release the photos. Does anyone know if theres anything to this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I Saw Some Posts Arguing That These Would Not Be Covered.
The details of which I do not recall. But, it did sound like these would not qualify. I am no expert however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_J Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thanks

I found what may be the relevant section. The complete document is at :

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/10/20051014-1.html

(sorry, this newbee doesn't know how to paste a link properly)

Perhaps someone can translate and explain the following sections?



"Rule 1103A. Sealed exhibits and proceedings.

(a) In general. If the record of trial contains exhibits, proceedings, or other matter ordered sealed by the military judge, the trial counsel shall cause such materials to be sealed so as to prevent indiscriminate viewing or disclosure. Trial counsel shall ensure that such materials are properly marked, including an annotation that the material was sealed by order of the military judge, and inserted at the appropriate place in the original record of trial. Copies of the record shall contain appropriate annotations that matters were sealed by order of the military judge and have been inserted in the original record of trial. This Rule shall be implemented in a manner consistent with Executive Order 12958, as amended, concerning classified national security information.

(b) Examination of sealed exhibits and proceedings. Except as provided in the following subsections to this rule, sealed exhibits may not be examined.

(1) Examination of sealed matters. For the purpose of this rule, "examination" includes reading, viewing, photocopying, photographing, disclosing, or manipulating the documents in any way.

(2) Prior to authentication. Prior to authentication of the record by the military judge, sealed materials may not be examined in the absence of an order from the military judge based on good cause shown.

(3) Authentication through action. After authentication and prior to disposition of the record of trial pursuant to Rule for Courts-Martial 1111, sealed materials may not be examined in the absence of an order from the military judge upon a showing of good cause at a post-trial Article 39a session directed by the Convening Authority.

(4) Reviewing and appellate authorities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. The judge gave DOD 20 days to respond, and I suspect that's
20 working days. That would put the release, or at lease another appeal by next week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC