General Ralph E. "Ed" Eberhart
Retired, Jan 1, 2005
From his bio:"General Eberhart entered the Air Force in 1968 as a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy. His staff experience includes serving as Executive Officer to the Air Force Chief of Staff at Headquarters U.S. Air Force; Deputy Chief of Staff for Inspection, Safety and Security, Headquarters Tactical Air Command; Director for Programs and Evaluation, Headquarters U.S. Air Force; Director of Force Structure, Resources and Assessment, the Joint Staff; and Deputy Chief of Staff for Plans and Operations, Headquarters U.S. Air Force. The general has also served as Vice Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force, Commander, Air Combat Command, Commander, Air Force Space Command, and as Commander in Chief, U.S. Space Command.
My bold. See more here:
http://www.af.mil/bios/bio.asp?bioID=5317Interesting about that U.S. Space Command.
Here is an excerpt from the speech given by theologian David Griffin, author of "
The 9/11 Commission Report; Omissions and Distortions," at the University of Wisconsin (broadcast via C-SPAN) in April of this year (my italics):
Fully Facing the Truth about the American Empire To be sure, as Chomsky, Falk, and Chalmers Johnson illustrate, strong portrayals of American imperialism as far from benign can be drawn without any suggestion that the Bush administration arranged 9/11. These portrayals can be drawn from publicly available documents.
One such document is the ÒNational Security Strategy of the United States of America,Ó published by the Bush administration in September of 2002. David North says, not unfairly, that this document Òasserts as the guiding policy of the United States the right to use military force . . . against any country it believes to be, or it believes may at some point become, a threat to American interests.Ó ÒNo other country in modern history,Ó adds North, Òhas asserted such a sweeping claim to . . . world domination.Ó40
Another such document, called ÒVision for 2020,Ó was published in February of 1997
by the US Space Command. The mission statement at the head of this document reads: ÒU.S. Space Command--dominating the space dimension of military operations to protect US interests and investment.Ó41 There is no mention of democracy and human rights. In the body of the document, in fact, we find this amazingly candid statement: ÒThe globalization of the world economy . . . will continue with a widening between ÔhavesÕ and Ôhave-nots.ÕÓ The point of this statement is that as the domination of the world economy by the United States and its allies increases, the worldÕs poor will get still poorer, making the Òhave-notsÓ hate America all the more. We will need, therefore, the power to keep them in line.
The United States can do this---and this is the documentÕs main message--through ÒFull Spectrum Dominance,Ó which will involve merging Òspace superiority with land, sea, and air superiority.Ó Dominance in space will include, the document frankly says, the power Ò
to deny others the use of space.Ó
By speaking only of the Space CommandÕs effort to develop a Òmissile defense system,Ó the Pentagon and the White House like to suggest that its purpose is purely defensive. But the goal includes weaponizing space so as to give US forces, in the words of a more recent document, a Òprompt global strike capability, whether nuclear or non-nuclear, (that) will allow the US to rapidly and accurately strike distant . . . targets.Ó42 The fact that the U.S. Space CommandÕs program is an aggressive one is announced in the logo of one of its divisions: ÒIn Your Face from Outer space.Ó43
Simply from these and other documents, taken in conjunction with the actions of the Bush administration and the US military, we can see through the claim that the US project of creating the first truly global empire is a benevolent or at least benign enterprise. However,
we can fully grasp the extent to which this project is propelled by fanaticism based on a deeply perverted value system only when we realize that the terrorist attacks of 9/11 were orchestrated by our own leaders--and that they did this to provide the justification, the fear, and the funding for the so-called war on terror, which would be used as a pretext for enlarging the empire.
I will illustrate this point with one of the most brazen examples of the use of 9/11 to get funding. Shortly before the current Bush administration took office, a document entitled Rebuilding AmericaÕs Defenses was published by an organization called the Project for the New American Century,44 founding members of which included Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, and Donald Rumsfeld. This document focused primarily on getting more tax money allocated for the technological transformation of the US military,
with the centerpiece of this technological transformation being the US Space CommandÕs project to weaponize and thereby control space. Because this transformation of the US military will be very expensive, the document said, it will probably proceed very slowly--unless America suffers Òsome catastrophic and catalyzing event--like a new Pearl Harbor."45 It is interesting that on the night of 9/11, President Bush reportedly wrote in his diary, ÒThe Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today.Ó46
In any case, earlier that evening, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld was on message. We might assume that he would have been disoriented by the fact that the Pentagon had just, on his watch, suffered an unprecedented attack. Instead, he was ready to use the attacks to obtain more money for the US Space Command.
In front of television cameras, Rumsfeld berated Senator Carl Levin, then chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, saying:
Senator Levin, you and other Democrats in Congress have voiced fear that you simply donÕt have enough money for the large increase in defense that the Pentagon is seeking, especially for missile defense. . . . Does this sort of thing convince you that an emergency exists in this country to increase defense spending . . . ?47
This strategy worked. Congress immediately appropriated an additional $40 billion for the Pentagon. Since then, furthermore, the president has gotten every additional appropriation he has sought for the so-called war on terror.
I suggest the entire Griffin transcript is worth reading. It can be found here:
http://www.911citizenswatch.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=535or:
http://tinyurl.com/9sx3pA DVD of this talk is available for a small donation from the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth:
http://www.mujca.com/