Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harpers: We are living in a fascist state

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:37 AM
Original message
Harpers: We are living in a fascist state
Harpers isn't a paradoid kinda bunch..whatdo you all make of it?

Harper's Magazine: We Now Live in a Fascist State

Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:34:38 -0700

The article below appears in the current issue of Harpers and was written
by Lewis H. Lapham

www.harpers.org/LewisLapham.html

Knowing the source of this piece makes it all the more disturbing. It is not every day that the editor of a respected national magazine publishes an essay claiming that America is not on the road to becoming, but ALREADY IS, a fascist state.... or words to that affect.

To help prepare you for what follows, here are the final sentence from this piece....

On message By Lewis H. Lapham Harper's Magazine, October 2005, pps. 7-9 "But I venture the challenging statement that if American democracy ceases to move forward as a living force, seeking day and night by peaceful means to better the lot of our citizens, then Fascism and Communism, aided, unconsciously perhaps, by old-line Tory Republicanism, will grow in strength in our land." -Franklin D. Roosevelt, November 4, 1938

http://organicconsumers.org/Politics/harpers101205.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well bowl me over!
Harper's and not TRUTHOUT or The Nation or, or ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Dad is getting Harper's for Xmas! Already determined, but
Edited on Mon Oct-24-05 12:47 AM by babylonsister
thanks for the reinforcement!

Edit to add, RE: Fascism: Yes, we need to get rid of these PNAC people, this admin, and the current mindset!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Harper's is right, it's true. n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenroy Donating Member (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Lapham has always been a lefty
Personally, I find his essays unreadable. But he's known for being very liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why? Please explain. I have no opinion one way or the other. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenroy Donating Member (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Why I find him unreadable?
I just don't like his style. I'm fond of simple, declarative sentences. He writes sentences that require a road-map to navigate. It's an impressive skill, but I don't enjoy reading it.

I've read his magazine for years, and I always try to read his essay. Unfortunately, every time, I get no more than 6 paragraphs in and just give up because I'm not quite sure what he's trying to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Try reading it aloud.
It'll help. When you get lost, refer back to the opening quote.

I used to find them impenetrable but now I love them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Thanks for your explanation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheWhoMustBeObeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. But remember:
It's gonna be the best goddamned fascist state ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. Of the Corporation, By the Corporation, and FOR the Corporation
...shall not perish from this earth, unless we have something to say about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well...
I think it's a generally good argument, but he's missed a few key points:

"He'd encountered enough opposition to both the New Deal and to his belief in such a thing as a United Nations to judge the force of America's racist passions and the ferocity of its anti-intellectual prejudice. As he may have guessed, so it happened. The American democracy won the battles for Normandy and Iwo Jima, but the victories abroad didn't stem the retreat of democracy at home, after 1968 no longer moving "forward as a living force, seeking day and night to better the lot" of its own citizens, and now that sixty years have passed since the bomb fell on Hiroshima, it doesn't take much talent for reading a cashier's scale at Wal-Mart to know that it is fascism, not democracy, that won the heart and mind of America's "Greatest Generation," added to its weight and strength on America's shining seas and fruited plains."

-The flawed assumption he makes is that the middle class or bourgeoisie have still rapidly expanded over the last 60 odd years. Suburbinazation, desegregation and an increasingly populated college system have all moved literacy and well-being forward in broad swaths of the American public. However, he is right in the sense that the people who have been left behind are becoming more left behind as time passes. This is the reason we've been having such close elections and we don't have the Hitler-esque stuff going on in the streets across America or open genocide. The bourgeoisie have grown confortable and will object to a loss in comfort which is the natural result of a culture of corruption combined with failing governance. If anything, Democrats should be optimistic that we've almost reached 2006 and the sublime leader looks bad. Germany, Italy, Spain and Soviet Russia all did not have somewhat free and open elections after the sublime fascist leader had seized power. Thank God for the US Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. yep
Don't look in just one direction, either; it's systemic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. The Fascist Axioms:
He attempts to describe a way of thinking and a habit of mind, and on sifting through the assortment of fantastic and often contradictory notions -- Nazi paganism, Franco's National Catholicism, Mussolini's corporatism, etc. -- he finds a set of axioms on which all the fascisms agree. Among the most notable:

The truth is revealed once and only once.

Parliamentary democracy is by definition rotten because it doesn't represent the voice of the people, which is that of the sublime leader.

My only problem with this is that, in my case, true democracy would have my shipped off to a concentration camp even faster than representative democracy. I mean, really, let's vote on whether we want gays running loose in society.

Doctrine outpoints reason, and science is always suspect.

Intelligent design anyone?

Critical thought is the province of degenerate intellectuals, who betray the culture and subvert traditional values.

This is obvious in Freeperland.

The national identity is provided by the nation's enemies.

We are against terror. But what are we for? Truth? Beauty? Love?

Argument is tantamount to treason.

This is demonstrated by Bush most blatantly. Remember the interview by the Irish press?

Perpetually at war, the state must govern with the instruments of fear. Citizens do not act; they play the supporting role of "the people" in the grand opera that is the state.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. So do you believe we are in or headed toward Fascism?
Our government is certainly not a true democracy and shouldn't be as you mentioned. Not a representative form either. Our so called representatives are first and foremost answerable to their corporate sponsors. We are far from a free country. Our Senators are mostly elected for life. And the HOR is starting to get the same way. Almost all of our government leaders are wealthy. Hard to see them looking out for the middle class or poor. Unions are dieing, poverty is increasing. Looks like tyranny to me. The fact that the grass roots demo's are powerless to stop the big money Hillary machine is a good example that we, the middle class, no longer control anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. We've been telling folks that all the warning signs are right under,...
,...their noses. But, instead of a rational observation of the facts, people are stuck on the emotional reaction to the word, "fascism".

What else can we do? :shrug: We've adopted alternative descriptors like, "rampant corporatism" and "corporatocracy",...but, those simply are not strong enough to reveal how this country is evolving to a fascist state.

It's terribly distressing and frustrating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. Lapham has been around
Most disturbing to me is that many in his generation are coming to that conclusion. I have personal acquaintances who left Germany in the 30s, lived under Franco, Pinochet, the former Soviet Union and Mussolini. They are all now in their 70s and 80s and they are the most alarmed at what is happening in this country. The red flags for a one-party state are there, yet it seems only those who have lived through it before can see them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. What struck me about Lapham's
essay was how similar in some points it seemed to many of the comments made by George Soros as to why he felt the need to oppose Bush so strongly in the 2004 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Helga Scow Stern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
17. Watch the movie Downfall if you haven't.
The parallels are so striking. It explains a lot, like why normally intelligent, decent people will follow a nut job into hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Read Sinclair Lewis's book "It Can't Happen Here"....
...cause guess what....Oh, yes it can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
al bupp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. IMHO, this is one Lapham's best essays
and should be read by every DUer. He hits the nail squarely on the head w/ this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vince3 Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. In the penultimate paragraph...
..."two presidential elections stolen with little or no objection by a complacent populace." A terrific essay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. ..."two presidential elections stolen with little or no objection . . .
by a complacent populace."

Or an "opposition" party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC