Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark and the Military Vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 08:02 PM
Original message
Clark and the Military Vote
It seems to me that Clark might well be able to grab a good bit of the military vote that is generally considered, rightly or wrongly, to belong to the Republicans. Whenever he answers questions about his support for both the military and veterans he wins the hearts of those groups and absolutly no one one either side doubts that he means it. I think even the youngest of our men and women in uniform are worldly enough to understand the imposter that Bush is a flightsuit compared to Clark in a business suit, but the General non the less.

Anyway its a though, just a part of the traditional Republican voting block that might be up for grabs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. True, but because of how badly Dumbo has screwed the military any Dem...
...will get a large block of that vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. yep I'd love to see how DK would get a
Edited on Sat Oct-11-03 01:31 AM by Clark Can WIN
huge military vote, or even Dean.

on edit both say things I like very much, but I disagree with the notion that all Dems could capture the military vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomUser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Good point
Not all the Dem candidates will be able to get the military vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah,
Edited on Fri Oct-10-03 08:26 PM by lovedems
considering the absolute mess Iraq and Afganistan are. Shrub and his neocons in the pentagon don't have a clue what they are doing and who is effected by that? The folks in the military and their families.

Then you have Kosovo(still laughed at by rethuglicans) and how many troops were killed? a big fat ZERO! Where is the nasty little booger Milosivich? At the Hague getting his justice. Geez, imagine that, we went to save a country from ethnic cleansing AND FOUND THE BIG BAD GUY. Those were the good ol' days.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomUser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. I agree
It's not enough to get them to hate bush -- they'll just stay home. You need to energize them and get them to rally around and believe in the Dem nominee.

If Bush keeps screwing up in Iraq, he may not get the military vote. But neither will the Dem nominee if they don't like him. Clark shines in this area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do you really think the repukes will count absentee military
votes this time? If you believe that, I've got a nice bridge to sell ya. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Still a lot of family members and veterans will be in a voting booth n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Good point! I wasn't trying to ..
argue with the subject of the thread. I was just adding my two cents about counting the military absentee ballets. I do agree that smirko can kiss the military vote goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxi Driver Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't think
that the military is a significant voting bloc. They vote Republican because Republicans give pay increases. The question is: Do they want to get paid more or to get out of Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The republicans give them pay increases?
I don't know where you're getting your news but republicans are continuing to cut veteran's benefits and military pay hasn't gone up one bit as far as I know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomUser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. The military voting block extends beyond the military
I don't think that the military is a significant voting bloc.

It includes military families and all those people who have had a family tradition of serving the country going back generations. There are large swathes of the south, where serving the country is a central cultural theme. Small towns, like the one where Jessica Lynch came from, have a devoted patriotism meme. The military is an escape valve for people needing money to further their education, and a way out of depressed local economies. They believe in serving the country, and almost everyone knows someone who has served, going back generations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. Not only that, the military voting bloc resides heavily in
Southern states, which we need desperately to win back after the last two elections. Just one more reason why Clark Can WIN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumptheshadow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. Clark and Kerry have a great shot at this vote
But especially Clark. Dean is much weaker here because of his deferment, yes, military families may vote for him but they won't be as energized as they would be for Clark or Kerry. Clark, however, must excel in his upcoming speeches because he hasn't had much of a media forum in the past two weeks.

Unfortunately, that means lots of good sound bites. The "Bush is a miserable failure" kind of sound bites that get picked up by the media and by other candidates.

I hope that Clark's speechwriting team is working on a couple targeted directly to the military audience. The raw material for these sound bites certainly is there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
14. The impact of the military vote
goes well beyond the bountries of the active duty people. There is a huge web of families, vets and the communities surrounding bases that are effected by the mindset. The perception that Dems don't support the troops has been sold and bought by these various groups. At the national level, Dems have consistently supporter vets, and many Dems have never seen a weapons system they didn't like.

The problem we face when chosing a candidate is two fold. For the those who never bought the war, we need someone who was on our side. For the recently converted, we need to offer a candidate that assures them that while they may have been fooled; they are not "fools."

Basically, this is a scale of proportions. Any Dem may get some of the vote, but Clark will win most, if not all, of this vote.

What is most important about trend, is that first, it is dangerous, really dangerous to have the military in the hands of one party. Clark also knows, who is moving up the system who would both provide him with allies in the any battles to get rid of pork, but would set a new tone in the Pentagon. Rummy has quietly been doing just the opposite for three years.

Second, it makes junior-rover spend money and time on what should be their base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fknobbit Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. Debunking Republican pay raises.
Edited on Sat Oct-11-03 10:45 AM by fknobbit
I spent 22 Yrs in the U.S.A.F and remember every screwing the repukes handed down... Ike said the Gi's did not need any money for anything but Cigarettes and beer. Rayguns first official act was to freeze military pay. the second was to arbitrarily kick some thousands of Veterans out of the V.A. system, past Federal judges were less right leaning and would not allow it. Graham Rudman prevented realistic cost of living increases. It goes on and on but the correction I would like to make is this:

Current Military pay raises were proposed to and passed by Congress 5 years in advance and it's up to the current administration to request the funding for the current years proposed raise.

in 1999 Clinton, well actually it was Sec Def Cohen, sought to bring military pay more in line with civilian sectors to improve retention. Clinton's 5 year plan consisting of large percentage raises proposed while Clinton was President to pass and sign it. Bush is now taking credit for Clinton's pay raise.

Kerry seems to be the only Candidate who is able to pronounce Veteran and for some reason it's as if Clark is taking the fifth on the Veterans issues. He missed a hell of a chance during the latest debate and deferred to Kerry and Sharpton.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC