Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBV Alert! CNN Headline News reports 400,000 missing votes on recall in LA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:33 PM
Original message
BBV Alert! CNN Headline News reports 400,000 missing votes on recall in LA
Hadn't heard anything about this. Didn't see anything on their website? They said the votes that weren't recorded were on the recall. And that it happened mainly in LA.

Anyone else know more? Another one of those suspicious anomalies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm...
That ought to change the complexion of things, just a tad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. ha ha
I have neutralized you comment with the dreaded :tinfoilhat: !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. MORE PROBLEMS!!
By J. DOUGLAS ALLEN-TAYLOR (10-10-03)

How smoothly last Tuesday’s recall election went in the city of Berkeley depends upon which end of the process you observed. Poll workers reported a nearly flawless experience by voters using the Diebold touch-screen voting machines throughout the city. But there were glitches in the vote compiling process.

http://www.berkeleydaily.org/text/article.cfm?issue=10-10-03&storyID=17546

This is why having observers at the polls would become useless with these machines... The cheating might be going on AFTER the votes have been cast... -C
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. This is excellent!
It should have a post of it's own! Fascinating reading, poll workers plugging in the modems in the wrong holes???? Quote from the article:

Ginnold said she had no information as to why the Berkeley machines malfunctioned, but said that in other upload centers in the county, some of the uploads failed when workers plugged the modem into the wrong slot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Feel free to post as new thread!!
Spazito, go ahead... -creativelcro
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Thank you! Just posted, thanks for the find!
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. wrong slots ?
"Ginnold said she had no information as to why the Berkeley machines malfunctioned, but said that in other upload centers in the county, some of the uploads failed when workers plugged the modem into the wrong slot."

Perhaps they were try to plug a phone plug into an Ethernet socket ? Often they are on the same wall plate... No idea... -creativelcro
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ParanoidPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. No, the machines are built with two PCM/CIA slots.....
.....for plug in peripherals. If the modem isn't plugged into the proper slot, the machine won't see it, or so they say. Most computers and even handheld devices have some form of 'plug and play' capability. The OS should recognize and authenticate a device and then set it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. I would say democracy will become useless with these machines
I dare say it will. and it never hurts to keep saying this...'cause it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. 400,000 that they know about...
I seem to remember hearing about high voter turn out and millions of absentee ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. what ws the difference in the yes/no votes?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. 851,138
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. thanks..
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. and, pray tell, how many votes did the recall win by in LA county?
Edited on Fri Oct-10-03 05:47 PM by arcane1
Shall Gray Davis be recalled?

Yes 877,955
No 911,811

for a difference of 33,856

verrry interestiingggg.... though I had thought that the recall won there

and of course it was in the more conservative areas of SoCal that the petitions got most of the signatures...

hmmm.... not sure what the deal is... though the recall won the state by twice that number of missing votes

would've been interesting, to say the least
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Each incident...
...casts doubt on the whole mess. And the media calling the race for Arnie 30 seconds after polls closed? COME ON...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
28. And the media calling the race for Arnie 30 seconds after polls closed?
That's what really got me about this too.. sort of treats the actual poll with complete contempt.

The race wasn't that onesided that the exit polls might not have been wrong....

At the time I thought. These guys are testing the public to see how dumb they really are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I don't think they waited that long
It was feeling like he already won mid-day according to the local tv news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
46. According to my timing
CNN projected the recall of Davis has succeeded at 8:00:02 PM PDT and that Ahnold would be the next governor at 8:00:05 PM PDT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. More importantly
How many more votes did Schwarzenegger get than Bustamante?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. 1.3 million plus some
It's not even close which is why the exit polls called it for arnie.

Arnold Schwarzenegger . Rep 3,850,804 48.7 %
Cruz M Bustamante .. . Dem 2,504,481 31.7 %
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. I sure would like to know where the "missing votes" went?
Another "oh-oh" by the e-vote machines? How do you track down 400,000 lost votes WITHOUT a paper trail???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. LA turnout was lower then expected, I thought.
Also, it was one of the few counties that shifted from majority yes to majority no as the precincts came in. And it didn't finish until late.

I suspect that there are lots of votes missing from Alameda (Oakland, Berkeley). Turnout there was very low historically and relative to neighboring counties. Alameda was a Diebold county, and also had an unusually high number of votes for the unknowns running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I have neither seen or heard anything on either the absentee or..
provisional ballots, has anyone here? It just seems odd to me that nothing seems to being said about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Did they give any more info?
like what they plan to do about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. here ya go


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/10/09/state2033EDT0164.DTL

Note that one study is by this guy Brady who was the Berkeley professor that ACLU referred to as the credibility behind their efforts to stop the Recall (due to the use of punch cards.) I would like to know who this guy is in bed with, and what his motivations are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yep!
And thousand of Florida voters purposely meant not to vote for their Presidential pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. This part is so pathetically obvious!
Executives at voting equipment companies strongly refuted the conclusion. They said the difference could have been due to a complicated ballot with more than 135 candidates and two proposals.

They said the same thing in Florida, now in California too. At some point, as they keep blowing it, someone will point out this obvious scapegoating!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Duh, some elections have complicated ballots. Their
products should handle ALL elections.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Ask Jones
Thanks for the hard work.

Why don't you ask Doug Jones about Brady? I think he wanted him to be part of a voting study. I never got an answer back as to why. Wasn't that previous study the one that ended up being funded by Sequoia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twilight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. kick!
<eom>

:nuke: :grr: :nuke: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noordam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. Remember these are problems with punch card votes
the Repugs have already taken care of the Touchscreen voting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. This is true, that is why there needs to be....
VOTER VERIFIED PAPER BALLOTS, for sure! The only reason there are no problems reported with the touchscreen is that there is no paper trail to show, sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. Thats what they keep TELLING us. And our media is trustworthy?
American media. Where truth is fiction and fiction is truth.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. On the local news on election day.
they showed Arnold S. voting in a spacious precinct in Pacific Palisades in a proper voting booth. Then they should the poorer neighborhoods in South Central. There the voters didn't have booths in many of the precincts. They tried to vote as best they could at makeshift tables or any space available. One DU'er said she had to wait two hours to vote. Has anyone there looked into this? It seems like a lot of voters especially in poorer, Democratically dominated neighborhoods could have been disenfranchised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
32. 9% did not vote on recall
In 2000, my county, Cook IL, had one of the worst failure rates of the punch cards, it might have been the worst, I think it was 7%.

This is what the ACLU's suit was about, this failure affects minorities much worse. It's what HAVA is about.

Thank god the 2000 election wasn't close in IL, it would have been another Florida. Thank god CA this time wasn't close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. How do you know it wasn't even close Cocoa?
Seems to me that there was alot of funny business going on with the Diebold machines in Alameda and Tulare counties. Low estimates of at least 500,000 provisional ballots. 400,000 missing ballots from LA county. I think we have us another stolen election. How is it the media was calling this race in the morning at 10:00. Something stinks, are you here with the air freshener?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Cocoa ... I've got to agree with you on those 2000 undercounts.
They were scandalous. What do you think of the machines Cook County used in 2002?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
36. Sorta off-topic, but What happens if a candidate refuses to concede?
to concede when expected, or at least until everything is hunky-dory?
Is everything in limbo until the candidate concedes? What are the legalities/timetable involved? Could refusing to concede be a possible strategy to make sure the truly elected obtains the office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I certainly hope someone questions this smelly election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-10-03 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. When Davis was conceding I was yelling "Wait just a few days!"
And sure enough 3 days later.... :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
40. The mercury News has a link
Studies cite 'missing votes' from punch card ballots
By Rachel Konrad
ASSOCIATED PRESS

SAN FRANCISCO - Two independent studies of California's recall election found "missing votes" in counties throughout the state, casting doubt on antiquated punch card systems.

Nearly 9 percent of people who cast ballots on punch card voting machines in Los Angeles County did not vote on whether to recall Gov. Gray Davis, said researchers at Harvard University and UC Berkeley. Researchers said one in 11 voters in the state's most populous county either abstained from the recall question or disqualified their selection by voting both "yes" and "no."
...
Harvard University research fellow Dr. Rebecca Mercuri, who conducted the other study, characterized the votes as "missing." She concluded that many of the 383,000 ballots that didn't answer the recall question had their selections erased by malfunctioning machines...

http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/6980504.htm

same story on the NBC affliate
http://www.nbc4.tv/politics/2545844/detail.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
41. bumping this baby.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
42. Quick! Someone call in Katherine Harris!
Here she comes (on her broom) to save the day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
43. Here's an interesting article from the Berkeley Daily Planet on the vote..
count.

some snippets from it:

How smoothly last Tuesday’s recall election went in the city of Berkeley depends upon which end of the process you observed. Poll workers reported a nearly flawless experience by voters using the Diebold touch-screen voting machines throughout the city. But there were glitches in the vote compiling process.
And while Alameda County preliminary vote totals were available early Wednesday morning, precinct or even city results weren’t—even as late as Thursday afternoon.

snip

But Ginnold said that she was at a loss to know why compiled city results (such as the number of votes for each candidate and for or against each issue in Berkeley) were not available two days after the election. She said that such results are normally available to the public on the night of the election.

snip

Ginnold said she had no information as to why the Berkeley machines malfunctioned, but said that in other upload centers in the county, some of the uploads failed when workers plugged the modem into the wrong slot.

http://www.berkeleydaily.org/text/article.cfm?issue=10-10-03&storyID=17546
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
44. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-11-03 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
45. Kick
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC