This supposed "lost" notebook of Judy's is certainly a singular piece of evidence, is it not? Is it really legit? Has it been altered? Forged? Can the info it contains really be trusted? Etc. Any way Fitz would be able to tell?
Several years ago there was a scandal in the medical academic community involving allegedly falsified research data. As I recall, the courts ordered the ink analyzed to see if it the data had been added to at a later date, and were able to determine when something had been written.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.