Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Novak, "knows who it is—and it's not someone at the White House."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 07:33 AM
Original message
Novak, "knows who it is—and it's not someone at the White House."
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1118313,00.html

Another character in the drama remains unnamed: the original source for columnist Robert Novak, who wrote the first piece naming Plame. Fitzgerald, says a lawyer who's involved in the case, "knows who it is—and it's not someone at the White House."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. bolton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Now wouldn't that be fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Bolton certainly had access to the information.
You would expect Bolton working in the State Dept. on nonproliferation to be very familiar with the CIA intelligence unit working on the same topic.

He also has the personality to do such a thing.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Have A Dream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. I seem to recall that Bolton visited Miller while she was in jail.
Given this, what you're saying makes sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. LOL!
Re: Fitz:

"If he played his cards any closer to the vest, they'd be in his underwear," says a lawyer who is a friend of the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Judith Miller
that was why Judy never did get around to writing a story about. She was too busy doing Libby's dirty work, telling all her other reporter friends, so that they could write about it instead and she got to keep her nose clean.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. I concur.
But Fitz still needs to find out how Judy got the info - hence the Libby and Rove investigation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Novak's credibility is rather...low...shall we say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. I agree
I would not believe anything out of any of em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. crazy John Bolton
is my guess and has been for a while :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hrm.

The article isn't by Robert Novak, but by Viveca.

The person who is stated to know "who it is—and it's not someone at the White House" isn't Novak, it's Fitzgerald. This according to some involved lawyer, which would mean a WH shill since noone in Fitz's camp is talking.

FWIW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. Interesting article!
It's interesting to consider who the reporters' source is? Which lawyer involved in the case is talking to reporters?

I am going to guess that it is Rove's lawyer(s). One reason why is the "clue" about Novak's sources not being from the White House. Of course, Novak was clear -- crystal clear, to borrow a phrase that seems to belong in discussions of this case -- that it was "two senior Administration officials."

As John Dean points out in "Worse THan Watergate" (page 170), "Usually, the term senior official refers to a vice president, cabinet officer, or top White House aide."

If this clue is accurate, it seems possible that we are looking at John Bolton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. I think Cheney's offices are officially outside the Whitehouse
I think Cheney's offices (plural) are officially outside the Whitehouse, though he probably has a room in the WH itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. I hate it when people do the "You have three guesses" thing.
Just tell us, Bob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. Doug Fieith and the gange at OSP
they hate the CIA generall?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
13. It bugs me when they say "someONE"..what, no conspiracy?
I was under the impression that 2 people had leaked to 6 reporters.

The PTB will want to keep it confined to one half of the White House or the other, won't they? Either Rove OR Libby but not both?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. At least three,
though likely six in all, leaked this to various reporters. Some were, of course, trying to reinforce the initial leak to specific reporters. That is by definition a conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. yep, this is how Rove has ALWAYS operated - hit them from every direction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. Where is Richard Perle?
Just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
19. Of course it's not Bob. Has to be those damned minions again
thinking and acting on their own. Just like at Abu Ghraib. Taking one for the team Bob?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
20. It's Bolton
Edited on Sun Oct-16-05 09:31 AM by symbolman
except you can't believe a word NoFACTS says - he's changed his story more times than Bush Co has changed the reasons for going into Iraq since they INVADED them.

Bolton was running a Renegade Intelligence Unit right in the middle of the State Dept. Theilman (Powell's puppy, doesn't seem to be a bad guy, but you can never tell), was instructed by Powell to attend EVERY morning meeting with Bolton and his crew.. well, Bolton's crew contained one Fietz who met Theilman at the door one morning and told him to stay the hell out of the meetings.. he wasn't "invited" anymore, they wanted to keep it in the "Family" (at this point in my film I show the mugshots of ALL the PNAC'rs as being the "FAMILY")..

Bolton was demanding RAW Intel Data, something that had never been done in his position as the State Dept intel squad ALWAYS filtered raw data before it left the area to go elsewhere in the building, so as to not give the wrong info to unfriendlies in their midst..

Bolton got his way too, a pack of bullies - Powell should have kicked Bolton's ass OUT before he took him down - Bolton was writing SAVAGE speeches, especially one on Bio Warfare possibilities in Cuba (some lost their jobs over that one) so that he could give speeches to Heritage Foundation goons and such, but he was SHUT DOWN on a lot of speeches, basically because they were just LOONEY.

Of course Powell didn't kick Bolton's ass out and paid the price when he went before the UN, reportedly his own aid said Powell THREW the speech and intel into the air and said, "I'm not going in there and saying this, THIS IS BULLSHIT!" - but under the tender guidance of Tenet he caved, Tenet sat right behind him (probably with a sharpened toothbrush he kept rubbing on the floor just in case Powell came to his senses and Tenet would have had to pierce Powell's caratoid artery like a hockey player taking out a goalie.. if you watch the footage you'll also see Negroponte (CRIMINAL, Always has been, ALWAYS WILL BE) sitting behind Powell too in the UN..

If you are old enough to remember, Powell was the nice boy who controlled the cover up of Mai lai (spelling) back in Nam, so he's no Angel folks.. no credit to his race either, a lying sack of shit.

Now Fietz (who I couldn't find a photo of) was Bolton's Mole in the CIA - he was working both sides of the Intel scene, kept his CIA Portfolio while at it.

Total bully, there are some interesting testimonies in PDF form online if you google the guy, being interviewed as to the why and where of how he pulled crap on his fellow State dept Intel folks to get them FIRED.. slimy, but very stupid.. good reading..

I personally think that Fietz was leaking to Miller, to cover for Bolton who was the one feeding her the info for the NY Times.

Been thinking of writing a book about all this since I spent a year researching, and at 150 minutes my film doesn't cover everything you could with a good solid BOOK -- BUT, at this point there are probably 10 Pulitzer Prize winners, guys like Sidney Blumenthal who will get huge advances with agents, etc..

I'd at LEAST like to offer something other than Miller's PACK OF LIES she will write for over a million, so I could trash her publicly and tell people NOT to support a lying bitch who's never told the truth in her life..

She's apologising now to try to reinvent herself and gain a modicum of credibility (tho the NY Times will have no option but to send her away - and she/they will come up with some silly reasoning for her to leave, time with family, to write a book to get at the TRUTH of the matter, etc, etc..) - I propose that we get about 100 blogs together and write a petition and get as many people as we can to sign it saying that we WILL BOYCOTT the Publisher of Her BOOK and WHY..

Hell, why can't a site called TAKEBACKTHEMEDIA TELL THE TRUTH, eh?

If I get enough coming in from somewhere I'll kick her ass in a book :) take me about 6 months, maybe less, since I spent a year researching already..

What do you think?

How about "F*CK Miller, she's a GODDAM LIAR, Buy TBTM's Book INSTEAD!" for a Marketing Slogan?

Maybe her colon will sneak upward, sliding oh so stealthily during a dark and stormy night - until it wraps around her neck and strangles her, it being the last vestige of Honesty left in her body...

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
21. Poppy !!!!!
Once a Skull & Boner, always a Skull & Boner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbonkowski Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
22. Ari's not "in the White House" anymore
Maybe this guy is parsing words, or repeating Novak's parsed words. Maybe it's someone who has resigned already. Oooh! Maybe it's Karen Hughes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Right..
"It isn't anyone in the White House.."

Oh yeah, that's right - Bush went to CAMP DAVID for the Weekend, and Rove when home with a headache you wouldn't believe.. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
24. But the White House knows who it is and that's one of the points.
They know and they are allowing it...TREASON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
25. Not someone "at" the White House.
Does this lawyer mean not "at" the White House now? Is this person ever "at" the White House? Was this person "at" the White House in the past? Will this person be "at" the White House in the future?

I guess it depends on what the meaning of "at" is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
26. Well, if Robert Novak says so, it MUST be true!
I wonder how much they're paying him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
targetpractice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Viveca Novak is the author.
Not Robert Novak. I don't know who she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
27. BOLTON! See Thread Here----->>>>>>>>>>
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5074048


It`s just a hunch, but remember those documents the Democrats demanded from the Bushies during Bolton`s Senate Rejection..er..um Confirmation Hearings:

The White House arrogantly REFUSED to hand them over! Must be something REALLY DAMNING in them don`t you think!!!!!

Perhaps something like this...

Made unusual number of requests for transcripts of secret conversations involving high-level U.S. officials:

As Under Secretary of State, BOLTON REQUESTED AND RECEIVED THE IDENTITIES OF 10 DIFFERENT US OFFICIALS WHOSE CONVERSATIONS HE READ IN TOP-SECRET NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY INTERCEPTS.
While it is not unheard of for U.S. officials to make these kinds of requests, ten “is unusually high for one person,” according to an intelligence official. Bolton did not acknowledge a request "for the names of the U.S. officials whose identities he sought, leaving some to believe that he was spying on his superiors and colleagues to advance his own agenda.

HMMMMM...

BUT WAIT THERE`S MORE:

Allegedly promoted faulty intelligence on Iraqi nuclear program: According to Congressman Henry Waxman, Bolton was the key proponent of the now-discredited claim that Iraq was seeking to acquire uranium from Niger to build nuclear weapons. In a letter to Representative Christopher Shays, Waxman writes that Bolton saw to it that the claim was included in President Bush’s 2002 State of the Union Address and then covered his tracks by using State Department secrecy rules.

SAY IT AIN`T SO!!!! SO WHEN WILSON CAME BACK FROM NIGER, AND EXPOSED BOLTON`S AND THE BUSH ADMIN`S LIES, AND EMBARASSED THE SHIT OUT OF HIM...BOLTON, BEING THE ARROGANT PRICK THAT HE IS, DECIDED HE WAS GONNA SHOW THAT WILSON GUY THAT YOU DO. NOT. FUCK. WITH JOHN BOLTON.

There`s your motive.

He`s also the only one of these criminals..no these TRAITORS who has NOT been interviewed or given testimony in front of the Grand Jury, which usually means you are one of the targets...if not THE target.

Yup. It`s Bolton. I`ll bet a $50.00 donation to DU that Bolton is the original leaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. did anyone take you up on your bet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Nope...want to match my donation? >>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
29. Bob Novak is the only person I actually trust less than Ahmed Chalabi.
Sorry, Bob. But your word is sort of meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. So who
wrote the memo that was passed around on AF 1????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. I think Bolton is the best guess
But I want to throw in another name. There are so many rats to choose from! I say George Tenet. Isn't he about to do a 'tell-all'? Isn't he, shall we say, at odds with the WH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. Maybe its George Bush Sr!!! or the Ghost of Christmas past!!!
or Bolton that would make sense!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC