Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: Family files lawsuit over RU-486 pill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:30 AM
Original message
AP: Family files lawsuit over RU-486 pill
Article Last Updated: 10/07/2005 08:47 PM

Family files lawsuit over RU-486 pill
Associated Press
LA Daily News

SANTA ANA - The family of an Orange County woman who died last year after taking the so-called abortion pill has sued the drug's U.S. marketer, alleging the company did not sufficiently warn women of potential risks.

Hoa Thuy Tran, 21, a student from Fountain Valley, died in 2003 after taking RU-486 and a follow-up drug to end a pregnancy. She is one of four U.S. women - all from California - who are reported to have died of infection after taking the pill.

RU-486, approved by federal regulators in 2000, is manufactured by New York-based Danco Laboratories and sold under the brand name Mifeprex. A company spokeswoman did not return a phone call Friday.

(snip)

http://www2.dailynews.com/news/ci_3097514
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
friesianrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder what's going on with this...
They were all from CA? And I wonder if perhaps they weren't using it incorrectly or something? This is so sad.

I know if (God forbid) I ever wanted/needed an abortion, I would much prefer the surgical route. It is fairly non-invasive and I'd rather have a physician right there if (again, God forbid) something went wrong.

Such a sad story - my heart goes out to her family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It would help if more were known about the pathology
Why should there be an infection? Was the drug contaminated?

Yes, very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. My educated kneejerk reaction is that . . . this is a plant . . .
My educated kneejerk reaction is that . . . this is a plant . . . an attempt to toss out RU-486 by anti-abortionists. And, religion-into-law nuts tried and tried and tried for years and years (more than 15 years or so) to not have the FDA allow RU-486 in the U.S.A. for all kinds of invented "reasons" and now this? (FYI, you cannot get more conservative, politically, than Orange County, California.)


.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
koopie57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. another pin idea
if you want religion to make policies for our government, then don't be surprised when the government wants to make policies for our relgion. errr...well, something like that anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I suppose that the woman killed herself just to make the drug look bad?
Good god, people. I understand a certain amount of caution, but the paranoia level around DU frequently spikes off the charts. Some things really aren't a conspiracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Instead of assuming stuff -- that that you accuse others of doing --
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 03:12 PM by TaleWgnDg
why not read what's posted? As well as read the hyperlinked url before jumping to any erroneous conclusions. Hmmmm? That is, instead of reading b/t the lines as if tea leaves! Again, it's a lawsuit that's been filed. And I'll bet that behind the lawsuit is anti-abortion proponents. Are you aware of the legal history of RU-486? I am. As an attorney I am very familiar with this area of law and medicine.

Who's trying to "fudge" deaths regarding "woman (who) killed herself just to make the drug look bad." :tinfoilhat: Not I, for tis only you who raised that illogic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting article on RU-486
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friesianrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks for posting this...
It is interesting that there are 3 medical conditions that would prohibit women from taking RU-486 (or at least women with these ailments shouldn't take the drug): Heavy smoking, heart problems or high blood pressure. The first I can definitely see some women lying about, and the other two could easily be conditions many women simply *don't* know about. Especially if you're talking younger women.

- RU-486: 1 death in 200,000 abortions

- Childbirth: 1 death in 14,300 pregnancies

That's a pretty damning set of statistics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErisFiveFingers Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. About those stats...
They don't seem to split mother/child/both death, or put another way, how many of those Childbirth deaths are newly born humans, or mothers... and their URL to the source link is broken.

Of course, the "human at conception" folks will argue that there are 200,001 deaths for every 200,000 abortions, so I'd like to have my numbers right, at least... anybody seen clearer stats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Read an article about the deaths. The pill was used as a suppository.
I have no idea where I saw the article. If anyone is interested in that subject, I suggest an internet search for it. There was talk that the pill was actually inserted as suppository instead of being taken in the traditional fashion. Some medical providers suggested administering it that way, but the infection was the result of a toxic shock syndrome type of effect. The problem really is not the pill, but how some people are advising them to take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Amazing. And this is true for any misuse of drug, of course (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. All four women that died apparently took the pill as a vaginal suppository
NPR had a discussion on this a couple months back when these women died. Drug researchers found that you can take a lower dosage as a suppository and still have the effectiveness of the oral method. In Europe, women are told to take the pills orally, despite the higher dosage.

Question: is this a way US drug companies tried to save money, by hoping to find a way to use less drug per patient yet still charge the same amount for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC