Josh Miller draws attention to yet another Judith Miller 'inconsistency.' To wit:
Letter shows Cheney aide was prodded in leak probeSat Oct 8, 2005 12:53 PM ET
By Adam Entous
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A top aide to Vice President Dick Cheney got a push from a prosecutor before telling New York Times reporter Judith Miller that he wanted her to testify in a probe into the outing of a CIA operative whose diplomat husband was an Iraq-war critic.
The prosecutor's encouragement, in a letter obtained by Reuters, has prompted some lawyers in the case to question whether Cheney's aide was acting completely voluntarily when he gave Miller the confidentiality waiver she had insisted on.
<clip>
Link:
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyID=2005-10-08T165159Z_01_EIC771654_RTRUKOC_0_US-BUSH-LEAK.xml&archived=False As Josh Marshall notes:One can't really blame Fitzgerald. It's the prosecutors job after all to squeeze these guys and get all the information he can using the looming threat of indictment to secure as much assistance as possible.
So Fitzgerald you can understand. And Libby too.
After all, by all accounts he's looking at a felony indictment coming down the pike. So you try to be as helpful as you can to the guy who has your fate in his hands.
But what about Miller? Her claim that she didn't crack now seems, well ... like a crock. This 'voluntary' doesn't seem any different from the first 'voluntary'.
And 'voluntary' has, of course, a withered meaning when it's the prosecutor calling for volunteers. It seems a lot more like she just got tired of sitting in jail.
Or, some other jeopardy not yet spelled out made her give up the game.Link:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_10_02.php#006717And, then she starts finding things around the house .... Hey Judy, get a clue -- just guess how many folk are listening to and watching every frigging thing you've been doing for quite some time now .....
Peace.