Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dr. Walter Orenstein just reminded CNN lady that 36,000 people die...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 06:46 AM
Original message
Dr. Walter Orenstein just reminded CNN lady that 36,000 people die...
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 06:52 AM by NNN0LHI
...every year in America from human flu while she was cranking up the ultra-fear about 60 people dying from avian flu since 2003. She looked dazed and confused and asked the doctor again in disbelief about the "normal 36,000 deaths from the flu here every year"? She acted like that detail completely ruined her show. I don't expect to see Dr. Walter Orenstein back again soon.

Don

Edit: I will post the transcript when it becomes available. CNN is slow on the weekends with transcripts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Reality bites
hard.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's the only way to deal with
these lunatics who are promoting fear non-stop. Expose them up publicly with facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Shame on him for using logic....
People don't like numbers that make them look like fear-mongers... yes, bird flu could turn out to be a pandemic, but in the meantime...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. in other words-she did not do any homework.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Typical corporate media wingnut, then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. We sure could have another pandemic. I lived though two of them
1918-1919 (Spanish Flu pandemic)------ 500,000 dead in US

1928----------------------------------------- Alexander Fleming Discovers Penicillin

1957-1958 (Asian Flu pandemic)--------- 60,000 dead in US

1968-1969 (Hong Kong Flu pandemic)--- 40,000 dead in US

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Is there an effective vaccine for the bird flu?
Do we have the immune system to fight this off if we don't have a vaccination?

The reason why the bird flu is so scary is because a bird flu killed millions of people in 1918.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Bird flu didn't kill most those people in 1918 though
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 07:20 AM by NNN0LHI
Most of those people died from secondary infections such as bacterial pneumonia for which there was no treatment in 1918 as there is now. Very important detail.

Don

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6315717/site/newsweek/%20

<snip>The 1918 flu—variant H1N1—spread with terrifying speed; in six days at a single Army base, Barry writes, the hospital census went from 610 to more than 4,000. It killed with devastating swiftness: pedestrians literally collapsed in the street; people woke up healthy and were dead by nightfall. It attacked multiple organs in the body, but always the respiratory system first, laying waste to the defenses by which the body keeps pathogens out of the lungs. Most victims succumbed to a secondary infection of bacterial pneumonia, for which there was no treatment in 1918. But in other cases, the virus was fatal in itself. Multiplying explosively throughout the respiratory tract, it provoked an immune response so furious that it devastated the lung's delicate tissues. And it was those deaths that explained H1N1's unique terror. Influenza typically kills the very young and the old, whose immune systems are too weak to fight it off, but Spanish flu killed young men and women in the prime of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Good to know. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. I don't think there even IS bird flu yet..
It's been transmitted from bird to bird, and from bird to human (where it has a fairly high mortality rate).. But I don't think it's made the person - person leap yet.

Hence, nothing to build vaccinations against yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. It has.
They have three confirmed cases of human-to-human transmission so far with a few others that look like they might have been but aren't confirmed. That's what my hubby told me last night, and I know he's been following it in his medical journals and websites.

They're in the testing phase of the vaccine now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I recall hearing this too. One was from daughter to mother.
The caregivers are most at risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. They're testing one.
The problem with the vaccine is that we usually use fertilized chicken eggs to make the flu vaccine (and others), but the avian flu (H5N1) has killed all the eggs before they can get anything out of them. They've had to come up with an entirely different way to manufacture the vaccine, so that's slowed down the process.

They're testing what they've got in healthy adults right now. Next, they going to test it on "elderly" patients (whatever that actually means) and then children last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Thank you,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. Duck, it's some reality-based.... reality!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. And I dont personally know anyone who died from regular flu
This whole thing is being mass produced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. So? That's availibility bias.
My husband knows many, but he's an internist and so would be the one treating them in the hospital and in the office. Because he knows many and you know none, maybe the truth lies in the middle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
24.  Well said,
I think the problem is no one trust this administration any more. Thier lesson of the boy who cried wolf is you dont tell the same lie twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'm surprised he didn't mention the 500k people who die
every year from tobacco-related illnesses.

What's so odd is that normal, annual deaths in the tens of thousands (and hundreds of thousands) are accepted as commonplace. That does not instill the panic media wants to boost ratings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
14. How could she not know that?
Oh, wait, yeah . . . another idiot at the desk. :eyes:

I hate flu season every year. It's the worst time for my hubby with long office hours and longer rounds in the hospital. It's bad enough in a normal year, but last year, with almost no vaccine in our area, was awful. I'm hoping they get enough vaccine this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
18. mediawhore flu!
nothing seen anything like it! wow! zap! powie! umfph! millions clueless!
there are 300 thousand mediawhores in usa alone...each needs day in court and night on deathrow....CNNT needs it the worst! lol
:shrug:

a big laugh- the pigmedia were all excited about the 'strange' deaths in a canadian hospital, suggesting evil aliens (maybe, hopefully) had somehow infested the great white north, but unfortunately the disease was from labs of the american NSA and had a couple short runs in the states ie 'legionaires disease' thus killed the story dead! all those mediapigs are oinking furiously at each other....fuxnews and cnnt etc were sorta messed up by FUKKING scientific fact, the poor benighted monsters...the hate festers in their cold dead hearts and the ravenous pig squeals we hear are just the mediawhores missing a meal... imho
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthout Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
21. Ooops... 36,000 overblown
Just found this...

http://www.mercola.com/2004/oct/30/flu_deaths.htm

"Upon further investigation of the CDC Web site, the actual number of deaths caused by the flu came to 257, with pneumonia accounting for the remaining number of deaths."

Pneumonia, not the 'flu' or Influenza, was the cause of the nearly 36,000 people dying last year.

Dr. Orenstein should have had his facts right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Kind of gives you a hint as to how many people actually died from...
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 09:03 AM by NNN0LHI
...influenza in 1918 doesn't it? With more than 200,000 people in the United States hospitalized each year for respiratory and heart conditions illnesses associated with influenza virus infections and only 257 actually dying from the flu it appears there is not a whole lot to worry about. The 500,000 number of dead they give for the 1918 pandemic also includes those who died from complications such as bacterial pneumonia rather than the flu, just like they do now. Wonder how many people would have not died from flu complications in 1918 had antibiotics been available back then?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
23. CNN Breaking Snooze: Saliva Is Fatal...
...when ingested in small doses over a period of decades. So says Dr. George Carlin.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. The transcript is up
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0510/08/smn.01.html

<snip>DR. WALTER ORENSTEIN, EMORY UNIVERSITY: Well, we really don't know how serious it will be. There are several things that make us concerned -- the spread in Asia, the numbers of people who have been infected so far and the fact that the virus is mutating and becoming more virulent.

On the other hand, we've seen no evidence of human to human transmission, which is necessary for a severe pandemic. So I think a much more likely scenario this season will be our traditional influenza outbreaks, where 36,000 people die, on average, and over 200,000 are hospitalized. So I hope everybody listening in who needs influenza...

NGUYEN: That's a traditional outbreak?

ORENSTEIN: That is a traditional annual outbreak.

NGUYEN: Goodness.

ORENSTEIN: It's under appreciated. And my hope would be is for people who need the current vaccine, they get it, that there's two things. One, it protects them from this year's flu, most likely flu; and, two, it helps to build our manufacturing capacity to gear up for a pandemic strain should it happen. snip

NGUYEN: So what do Americans do? Do they just get a regular flu vaccine and hope for the best?

ORENSTEIN: I think at the moment there's two things. One is they ought to get a flu vaccine if it's recommended for them. That's particularly the high risk -- people at high risk of complications for influenza. Again, that will help protect them from the most likely strains. And, two, it helps to build manufacturing capacity.

The second is to keep tuned. There will be more information that comes out and more guidance and more directions as we learn more about what happens with the avian influenza virus.

NGUYEN: So get your vaccine, your regular flu vaccine, that is.

ORENSTEIN: That's correct.

NGUYEN: And then stay on top of the daily reports about this.

ORENSTEIN: Exactly. I think that, again, the most likely influenza will be what we've seen before and what we tend to ignore, but is a serious illness.

NGUYEN: Absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Thanks, Would Like The Closure Of Hospitals & Clinics To Become An Issue
here as well.

It's a National Security issue. Having enough hospitals and clinics open around the country to deal with any disease outbreak early on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I agree. I know we had a hell of a nursing shortage not too long ago also
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 07:40 PM by NNN0LHI
I am not sure if that has improved or not? I hope it gets resolved.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC