Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Indiana bill would limit reproduction procedures for gays, singles

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Smoke Screen Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:27 PM
Original message
Indiana bill would limit reproduction procedures for gays, singles
Indiana bill would limit reproduction procedures for gays, singles
Panel to make recommendation to Legislature on Oct. 20
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) | Oct 4, 4:18 PM

An interim legislative committee is considering a bill that would prohibit gays, lesbians and single people in Indiana from using medical science to assist them in having a child.

Sen. Patricia Miller (R-Indianapolis) said state law does not have regulations on assisted reproduction and should have similar requirements to adoption in Indiana.

"If were going to try to put Indiana on the map, I wouldn't go this route," said Betty Cockrum, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Indiana. "It feels pretty chilling. It is governmental intrusion into a very private part of our lives."

Miller acknowledged that the legislation would be "enormously controversial."

"Our statutes are nearly silent on all this. You can think of guidelines, but when you put it on paper it becomes different," she told The Journal Gazette of Fort Wayne for a story Tuesday.

Miller is chairwoman of the Health Finance Commission, a panel of lawmakers that will vote Oct. 20 on whether to recommend the legislation to the full General Assembly.

The bill defines assisted reproduction as causing pregnancy by means other than sexual intercourse, including intrauterine insemination, donation of an egg, donation of an embryo, in vitro fertilization and transfer of an embryo, and sperm injection.

It then requires "intended parents" to be married to each other and says an unmarried person may not be an intended parent.

A doctor cannot begin an assisted reproduction technology procedure that may result in a child being born until the intended parents have received a certificate of satisfactory completion of an assessment required under the bill. The assessment is similar to what is required for infant adoption and would be conducted by a licensed child placing agency in Indiana.

The required information includes the fertility history of the parents, education and employment information, personality descriptions, verification of marital status, child care plans and criminal history checks. Description of the family lifestyle of the intended parents also is required, including participation in faith-based or church activities.

The legislation appears to affect some married couples, although the rough draft is unclear at times. Miller said the draft will be clarified before a vote.

The bill does not apply to assisted reproduction in which the child is the genetic child of both of the intended parents, for example, the sperm is from the father and the egg is from the mother. But married couples that need one or the other would still have to go through an assessment process and establish parentage in a court.

Ken Falk, legal director for the Indiana Civil Liberties Union, said his office began hearing about the bill Friday, a day after the rough draft was discussed by the Health Finance Commission.

He said it sets up a clear discrimination that would be difficult to uphold in court, and considers the bill to be unique nationally.

"My question is 'What is the danger that we are legislating against?' Are we saying that only married persons should be able to be parents, which is certainly a slap in the face to many same-sex couples but also to many who do not have a partner but have undertaken being a parent," Falk said.

Miller said the state often reacted to problems and that she wanted to be proactive on this issue.

"We're not trying to stop people from having kids; we're just trying to find some guidelines," she said.

She acknowledged such a law would bar single people from using methods other than sexual intercourse but said "all the studies indicate the best environment for a child is to have a two-parent family — a mother and a father."

http://www.southernvoice.com/thelatest/thelatest.cfm?blog_id=2752
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Our country is getting more and more like Nazi Germany
everyday. How long before they start sterilizing those they don't think are genetically acceptable enough to reproduce? It's not a long leap from that proposed law to forced sterilization altogether like in Nazi Germany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dretceterini Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. all of a sudden
the slyrics "It's springtime for Hitler, and Germany", from the Mel Brooks film came rusing through my mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. That was scrapped - see:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smoke Screen Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. thanks for the info
Thanks for the info. I'm a rookie and didn't catch that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Liars, Damned Liars and Repiglicans
"She acknowledged such a law would bar single people from using methods other than sexual intercourse but said "all the studies indicate the best environment for a child is to have a two-parent family — a mother and a father."


Damned no good Repiglicans just make stuff up as they go along. ALL the studies? Every last one of them? Is there a study that says a child with two alcoholic/meth addict parents is in the "best envirnonment?\" and the kids better off than with one stable homosexual? I really, REALLY want to see THAT one! (Probably published just last week by Foccus on the Fambly)

Jeebuss!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. I understood this nutball had backed off the proposed legislation
This is a bad sign, nonetheless, that things like this can even be considered as remotely rational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psychmd Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's been dropped for now
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 01:40 PM by Psychmd
The sponsor of this bill happens to be my state senator in Indiana. Patricia Miller issued a statement last night that she was not pursuing this legislation at this time. I hope it was in response to a significant number of phone calls from people outraged that she would even consider such a hate inspired piece of legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. *Please edit your post - 3-4 paragraphs only*
From the DU rules:

"Do not post entire copyrighted articles. If you wish to reference an article, provide a brief excerpt and include a link to the original source. Generally, excerpts should not exceed three or four paragraphs."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC