Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

REUTERS: DECISIONS TO INDICT WITHIN DAYS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:20 PM
Original message
REUTERS: DECISIONS TO INDICT WITHIN DAYS
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyid=2005-10-06T010649Z_01_KWA603946_RTRUKOC_0_US-BUSH-LEAK.xml

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The federal prosecutor investigating who leaked the identity of a CIA operative is expected to signal within days whether he intends to bring indictments in the case, legal sources close to the investigation said on Wednesday.

As a first step, prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald was expected to notify officials by letter if they have become targets, said the lawyers, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

Fitzgerald could announce plea agreements, bring indictments, or conclude that no crime was committed. By the end of this month he is expected to wrap up his nearly two-year-old investigation into who leaked CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity.

The inquiry has ensnared President George W. Bush's top political adviser, Karl Rove, and Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby. The White House had long maintained that Rove and Libby had nothing to do with the leak but reporters have since named them as sources.

Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, declined to say whether his client had been contacted by Fitzgerald. In the past, Luskin has said that Rove was assured that he was not a target.

Libby's lawyer was not immediately available to comment.

"It's an ongoing investigation and we're fully cooperating," said Cheney spokeswoman Lea Anne McBride.

The outcome of the investigation could shake up an administration already reeling from criticism over its response to Hurricane Katrina and the indictment of House Republican leader Tom DeLay on a conspiracy charge related to campaign financing.

New York Times reporter Judith Miller testified to the grand jury on Friday about the conversations she had with Libby.

Plame's diplomat husband, Joseph Wilson, has accused the administration of leaking her name, damaging her ability to work undercover, to get back at him for criticizing Bush's Iraq policy.

Fitzgerald's agreement to limit the scope of Miller's testimony to her conversations with Libby -- a proposal he rejected a year earlier -- suggested that Libby had become "the focus of interest," said one of the lawyers involved in the case.

After initially promising to fire anyone found to have leaked information in the case, Bush in July offered a more qualified pledge: "If someone committed a crime they will no longer work in my administration."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wheeeee!
!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. And so it begins... Praise God!
Recommended to Greatest Page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
39. Amen! and pass the popcorn and Cristal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Not to worry, the rest of the Pubbs will force Shrub to fire anybody
who is indicted! He may not say that! I'd expect to hear something like, it's unfortunate that these great people have received indictments, and I'm releasing them from their responsibilities to me and the country so they can give full time effort to clearing their good names!

HA HA, wait and see!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I think we have a psychic on our hands folks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. You think I'm a psychic? Hardly!
Remember, it's the Pub rules that demand that anyone indicted must resign their position! DeLay tried to have that changed, but failed! Do you honestly believe the rest of the Pubs will let Shrub keep potential felons? Lots of those folks are up for reelection. They won't take that chance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Nope, he is going to say they are all phony indictments, not
legitimate, all lies, and they will not step down or step aside. NOT ONE. They will all continue in their jobs, and nobody will be able to do a damned thing about it. And the Repukes will not impeach. They will just laugh at Fitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I'll stop arguing this tonight. Let's just wait and see.
Reelection is THE MOST important thing to those in the House and Senate. If they see this as harming that chance....

Well, I'll wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. on pardoning..
Can shrub* pardon someone AFTER they have been indicted, but before they are tried & found guilty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. No, he cannot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Oh yes he can, just like Gerry Ford pardoned Nixon after Nixon
resigned and before he could be prosecuted for anything.

This is a good possibility. Indictments come out one day, and Bush stays up all night signing pardons which he announces the next day. He is power-hungry enough to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
35. Rover to the doghouse/others?this IS the turning point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Indictments coming during George's speech, perhaps? Thursday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
36. MY Bet is FRIDAY indictments--Weekend talkingheads on fire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. I may have to go buy some champagne.
Or would that be a jinx? I'll wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Will the Chimperor be named an unindicted coconspirator
like Nixon re: Watergate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:28 PM
Original message
I hope Bush's fall is more damaging though.
The cocksucker deserves nothing less than the worst possible outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
38. Bush will get the Watergate/Nixon deal -smile,wave and get on that plane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Please Adhere to DU Copyright Rules.
That is, a limit of FOUR paragraphs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. popcorn
champagne?

This could be good

:popcorn: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. shit meet fan...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Remember that section of the movie
All the President's Men, where they just did a sequence of newspaper headlines to finish the narrative?

I can't help feeling that I will look back at these recent headlines with a similar emotion in future days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. I can't wait! I feel like a six year old on christmas eve.
If it helps, I'll leave cookies out for Fitzgerald.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is gonna be fun
:popcorn: :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. Ohhhhh,....be still my heart.
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. I hate to be a nervous Nelly, but...
I'm concerned that Libby will be the only one indicted.

We all know that this reaches up to Junior.

However, it's a question of what proof Fitz has.

It concerns me that Fitz agreed to allow Miller to only testify about her conversations with Libby. I'm wondering if that means he decided that it was better to indict at least one--than to have nothing at all.

If my thinking is off, let me know. I'd like to be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. And who will take his job?
Edited on Wed Oct-05-05 10:52 PM by goclark
"If someone committed a crime they will no longer work in my administration." - the Chimp


Everyone in the Crime Family should be in chains.

My ultimate goal is to get tickets to the Netherlands for the trial of the Century.

If they can't be tried for War Crimes, I want to be wherever they are when they go to jail.

Do you think that they will have an ebay bid for front row seats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. JumboTron in Times Square-Ding Dong the Kings are Dead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AintIgreat Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. Kicked!! and lets Bring those Republikkkans down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. BIRD FLU! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. I bet there will be no indictments. Just thinking how corrupt this
administration and Republican party is. Fitz is probably scared to indict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Maybe that's why they haven't pull the old smear-a-roo on him . . .
yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. He Wasn't Afraid In Illinois
He went after the top drawer folks and he got them. A dozen convictions so far, and the ex-Governor on trial right now!

Fitz doesn't operate that way.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. Agreed.
But it's curious that the right hasn't tried to smear Fitzgerald. Isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. they tried to bomb him but....
but they got caught. I hope he doesn't ride in any planes soon. Something doesn't smell right though.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattomjoe Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. If he was really afraid I would think he would have walked away
long before now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. He wasn't afraid to indict John Gambino
He wasn't afraid to indict the Blind Sheikh.

He wasn't afraid to indict George Ryan.

He wasn't afraid to indict Daley cronies.

I don't think you have a clue who Patrick Fitzgerald is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
29. Talking heads say he has to indict someone
Just what I've been picking up over the number of days---talking heads saying that after all this stuff with Miller, etc. that Fitzgerald definitely has to be announcing indictments. It would be a mess for him if after all this he said "nothing here-move on". It seems like he really needed the Miller testimony to put the frosting on the cake. Keep fingers crossed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. more than just ONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
30. Shit ... just waiting and watching! Want those pics released on the same
day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
31. *Please edit your post - 4 paragraphs only*
From DU rules:

"Do not post entire copyrighted articles. If you wish to reference an article, provide a brief excerpt and include a link to the original source. Generally, excerpts should not exceed three or four paragraphs."

thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
42. HOLY SHIT
Edited on Thu Oct-06-05 03:42 PM by npincus
if indictments do not come down, I will be severely depressed and demoralized, similar to the feeling after the last presidential election results were announced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC