Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More Miers Badness: she helped develop Patriot Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 04:09 PM
Original message
More Miers Badness: she helped develop Patriot Act
Miers has backed wide executive role
Was on team that developed Patriot Act


By Charlie Savage, Globe Staff | October 5, 2005

WASHINGTON -- As President Bush's counsel, Harriet E. Miers continued the expansive interpretation of presidential powers favored by her predecessor, Alberto Gonzales, who backed Bush's authority to hold terrorist suspects without trial, as well as the White House's right to withhold more administration documents from public disclosure than in the past.

Miers has also been outspoken in her support of reauthorizing the Patriot Act, which gave the executive branch new powers of surveillance over US citizens.

Now, Miers is Bush's choice to join the Supreme Court, to replace Sandra Day O'Connor.

That selection determines how much power a president can wield under the Constitution. Her nomination, announced Monday, followed the confirmation of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who supported broad war powers for the president in a case he heard during his brief tenure as an appellate judge.

The two appointments, both of lawyers with extensive White House experience, have raised alarm among critics of the Bush administration's broad reading of executive branch authority.

''The fact that the president is now seeding the Supreme Court with people who have been handmaidens in his efforts to increase the power of the executive without any check or oversight whatsoever is very disturbing," said Bill Goodman, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, which sued Bush on behalf of prisoners at the US facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Supporters of Miers, too, have invoked her work on Bush's terrorism policies to assuage fears among some conservatives that she may be too moderate.

''In her work respecting the War on Terror and the threats posed to our country by misuse of foreign and international law, Ms. Miers has applied the Constitution as the Framers wrote it," wrote Leonard Leo of the conservative Federalist Society.

A New York University law professor, David Golove, said executive power is emerging as a defining issue for the Supreme Court in the post-Sept. 11, 2001, era. In case after case, the Bush administration has argued that it has the authority to take measures it deems necessary to stop terrorists, while others have insisted on maintaining checks and balances.

<snip>

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/10/05/miers_has_backed_wide_executive_role?mode=PF

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Proponents of the Patriot Act must hate our Constitution IMHO and are out
to dismantle it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. VIDEO from April
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. First she sits on her a** after receipt of the 8/6/01 PDB about Osama
Then she participates in the construction of the *gag me* Patriot Act.

What we have here is a rabid wolf in sheep's clothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. When exactly were they working on the Patriot Act?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. oh about 6 months before 9/11. They just needed an excuse.
and boy, when Harry got through briefing the president in August, they had it all set up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. ooh and our boy harry is gonna support
give it all away harry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC