Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jesse Ventura on CNBC just said something that made me think

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:23 PM
Original message
Jesse Ventura on CNBC just said something that made me think
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 09:26 PM by ikhor
He said if Hillary gets elected in 2008, then the US would have been ruled by only two families in the last 24 years.

Donny asked him who he would support in 2008, and Ventura said himself, if he runs.


interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. very very good point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. different heads...
...same hydra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Amazing that Ventura makes anyone think
BTW, Roosevelts led the country for 20 years, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Don't forget the Adamses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Polethebear Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I like jess
but he's off on his numbers and timing.

24 years

1984-2008

What about Reagan????


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. The count is 1988 through 2012.
If Hillary's elected in 2008 she would go to 2012 -- 24 consecutive years of Bushes and Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Polethebear Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh........
ok:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. He's on the money
1988 to 2012 if Hillary wins. That's 24 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. How's he off? Do the math...
Geo. H.W. Bush was president from 1989 - 1993 (4 yrs) <4 yrs>
W.J. Clinton was president from 1993 - 2001 (8 yrs) <12 yrs>
Geo. W. Bush is president from 2001 - 2009 (8 yrs) <20 yrs>
Hillary R. Clinton IF president 2009 - 2013 (4 yrs) <24 yrs>

He's right. You're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Polethebear Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I thought he was talking about 2008-Jan 2009
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. Nopers. Easy enough to misunderstand. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. You really need to add Reagan years in there
I'd go with at least 32. Bush hijacked the Republican party and got himself on the bill with Reagan. Reagan didn't want him but Bush held all the purse strings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Originally I was factoring those in as well...
However, I noticed that when I took those off I got the 24 years that Ventura was talking about. I wholeheartedly agree that the 32 years should be included as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. Was Reagan really running things?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. oh right.....add 4 more years to compensate for reagan's 2nd term
Daddy Bush was definitely calling some shots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Just read your post.
It was Bush's show since 1980 IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Eight years... Big deal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Oh, yeah!
Morticia was my favorite.

Seriously, wasn't here concern about family dynasties back then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Not consecutively.
But if Hillary is elected in 2008, it would be:

Bush - 4 years
Clinton - 8 years
Bush - 8 years
Clinton - 4 years

That would be 24 consecutive years of Bush and Clinton.

It's time for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. What makes you think Hill won't get 8?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. It is time for a change
No matter how much I love the Clintons, I don't want them in the White House again. We're a country that should not have ruling families.

So....let's go Barbara Boxer! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. After listening to Bush for 5 years,
Jesse Ventura sounds like Winston Churchill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. And Albert Einstein, and Shakespeare all rolled up into one....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. 1932 to 1945
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newportdadde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. I loved the segment with Ventura
We got some Bush bashing, some straight no BS talk about Iraq, O'Liely = chickenhawk it was refreshing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. If he runs, Hillary wins
he will take more votes from the republican than from her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Hill will not get the Dem nom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hillary isn't a Clinton
She's a Rodham. I'm still not voting for her though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
23. they asked what he thought of the Two Party System....
he said its just one more choice than communist russia got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Thanks for mentioning that
I feel like the atonement for the baby boomers will be to end the two-party domination. It is as important subject as any and I am pleased the question was asked. I am glad you told us about it. It was an excellent reply by "Do I Stand Alone" Ventura.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
28. There is no "Clinton Family" in the same sense as the "Bush Family".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
30. I saw him interviewed a few days ago.........
.......and he said he was moving out of the country. When they asked him why, he said that this country is restricting freedoms too much and there are other countries that allow more freedom (I agree with him about that).

He didn't say where he was planning to move but my guess is probably Canada.

So if he does move, that would pretty much guarantee that he's not running for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. He said he likes water and warm weather...
so it isnt Canada. I bet Australia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. OH MY FUCKING GOD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC