Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Source to Stephanopoulos-President Bush Directly Involved In Leak Scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 09:55 AM
Original message
Source to Stephanopoulos-President Bush Directly Involved In Leak Scandal
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 10:04 AM by TacticalPeek



Source to Stephanopoulos: President Bush Directly Involved In Leak Scandal

Near the end of a round table discussion on ABC’s This Week, George Stephanopoulos dropped this bomb:

Definitely a political problem but I wonder, George Will, do you think it’s a manageable one for the White House especially if we don’t know whether Fitzgerald is going to write a report or have indictments but if he is able to show as a source close to this told me this week, that President Bush and Vice President Cheney were actually involved in some of these discussions.

more
http://thinkprogress.org/2005/10/02/bush-directly-involved



Bwaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. O.M.G.
Just tell me it is so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hope this is true
Stephenapolous is usually pretty cautious so it might be true. Nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
107. Especially with who controls the media
He has to becareful or he could be Dan Rathered. I'm sure he wouldn't say this unless it was really huge. I hope it's true! We could see Bush and Cheney off to jail after all!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
175. If this is true, then it would make sense just how close-to-the-vest Fitz
has played this. I mean, look at the track record. No leaks. NONE. They've kept all of this so tightly under wraps that nobody knows much of anything. If they really are working on a bombshell of this size, it would make sense that you wouldn't hear a peep out of anybody. They wouldn't want to tip their hands lest anyone under suspicion suddenly start fraternizing with the office shredder or some such thing...

Because you KNOW the bushies and their penchant for revenge and keeping score and holding grudges and exacting payback. Fitz knows he'd have the GOP hounds on him and everyone around him if anybody got wind of this.

MOST intriguing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #175
188. Fitz
If what you say is true, then Fitz might want to tell someone on the left, just in case he has an 'accident.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. We knew they are but
whether the miracle of proving it comes out..ah, that's the question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
75. Thus is the reason for the mediablaster:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
219. It Sure Is the Question
We've all been awaiting. Got fingers crossed behind back on this one. Hopeful, but dismay has become a part of life w/*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh. My. Goodness.
You don't build a house of cards in hurricane season.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
93. Sure you do. Hire haliburton to build and overcharge for it.
and then, give them a no-bid contract after the storm because of their experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #93
181. Oh yeah. I forgot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #181
217. I try to forget that, too. Hurts too much.
I have a guy who does my 401K. He asked if I wanted in on haliburton. I told him if he even dared to suggest it, i would be closing my account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here is the full text on Think Progress:
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 10:01 AM by Pirate Smile

Source to Stephanopoulos: President Bush Directly Involved In Leak Scandal

Near the end of a round table discussion on ABC's This Week, George Stephanopoulos dropped this bomb:

Definitely a political problem but I wonder, George Will, do you think it's a manageable one for the White House especially if we don't know whether Fitzgerald is going to write a report or have indictments but if he is able to show as a source close to this told me this week, that President Bush and Vice President Cheney were actually involved in some of these discussions.

This would explain why Bush spent more than an hour answering questions from special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald. It would also fundamentally change the dynamics of the scandal. President Bush could no longer claim he was merely a bystander who wants to "get to the bottom of it." As Stephanopoulos notes, if Bush played a direct role it could make this scandal completely unmanageable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. Hi PS ! That paragraph is the most poorly written I've ever seen...
Definitely a political problem but I wonder, George Will, do you think it's a manageable one for the White House especially if we don't know whether Fitzgerald is going to write a report or have indictments but if he is able to show as a source close to this told me this week, that President Bush and Vice President Cheney were actually involved in some of these discussions.


How did you guys decipher it so quickly? It mixed subjects and tenses and questions with statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. That was posted one minute after George S. said the words.
No time for editing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #25
45. You can tell he said it and didn't read it from a card or TelePrompter.
People frequently phrase things badly while just talking. That is what it looks like to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #45
101. "People frequently phrase things badly while just talking." Yes
This was obviously not written and prepared and read. When I read transcripts of extemporaneous talking from talking heads, I'm often amazed that anyone could understand what they were talking about. Written transcripts don't give the kind of visual and auditory cues that speech gives to show when they're changing streams of consciousness in the middle of the sentence.

Just as an aside, Al Franken absolutely drives me nuts when he changes thoughts three times before the end of a sentence and never finishes any of the thoughts, so he's been going on for about 200 words and I have no idea what he intended to say about any of the four or five subjects in, well, it's not a sentence, maybe a burst of phrases and clauses all of which appeared to be heading toward becoming a sentence but never did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
109. Wow
This also explains why Bush didn't do anything about Karl Rove. If he did do anything about Rove I'm sure Rove would've told he was involved too. I've always felt that if one of them fell they all would because they're all involved and it always goes back to the same person. Remember on that flight with Colin Powell to Africa wasn't Bush on that flight? Or was he on a different plane? My feeling hopefully was right and that Fitzgerald was going after Bush. He could've had the general idea it was him back in 2003 but needed more time to prove it. I don't think he would've kept going on unless he knew someone else was also involved. He could've gotten Karl Rove back in 2003 couldn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
156. Unless these repuke criminals have any evidence ELIMINATED!
whether they be animal or mineral.

I would not put it past these evil bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #156
184. That's what I worry about this too
Does Fitzgerald have everything to prove to the judges or is this a warning to Bush and Cheney so they can get rid of anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. The final countdown
Anybody know that song? That's immediately what started making laps around my head when I heard this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. The song that keeps going through my head
"When the wall coming tumbling down" by John Cougar Melloncamp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
79. Roy Orbison....America doesn't want you anymore...It's Over, It's Over,
It's OOOOver!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
44. Yes, I hear the synthesizers now!
The prelude is definitely cued up.

I remember that song.

How about new words to "Tomorrow" from "Annie"?

The indictments'll come tomorrow
bet your laundered dollar that tomorrow
they'll be some...
just thinking about the shackles
clears away the cobwebs and the sorrow
'till there's none!

When I'm stuck with a day that's fascist and gray
I just think of orange jumpsuits and I say....ohhhhh...

The indictments'll come out tomorrow
so you gotta hang until tomorrow
come what maaaaay
Tomorrow! Tomorrow! I love Fitzy tomorrow!
you're only a day away!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #44
163. great parody!
:applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #44
231. TwoSparkles, I LOVE your lyrics! Laughing out loud at something
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 01:54 PM by Radio_Lady
that isn't very funny.

Regards to "Annie" the musical -- and your superb ability to write this parody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. and how did Will
pontificate in response?

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Yes... please tell us Will's response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
81. Will said federal prosecutor does not need to write a report
We will know by end of October if there are indictments. In other words, he avoided the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dooner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #81
129. I heard that differently
I heard Will say "procecutors don't write reports" as in, the prosecutor is in this to try to indict, not to write reports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Can you say "unidicted co-conspirators"?
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 10:09 AM by Dudley_DUright
Sure, I knew you could. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. That's remarkable...
Stephanopolis must be fairly certain of what he is saying.

I can't imagine that he would put his reputation on the line--and say something that will later be debunked.

The question is, as Stephanopolis said, "if he is able to show...that President Bush and Vice President Cheney were actually involved in some of these discussion."

How could someone possibly "show" that Bush participated in the conversation? Everyone will protect them. They aren't going to admit it themselves. It will take someone willing to roll over on them.

So many questions. I really hope we find the answers soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Oval office tapes?
Way too much deja vu. "There's a signpost up ahead..."

Didn't someone say something about * standing in a certain corner of the room, behind a plant or something? Help my poor, old brain, but it seems to me someone said something about being sure the conversation was being taped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. Ok, maybe I just fell off of the turnip truck...
...but all conversations in the WH are taped?

I knew they were taped during the Nixon Administration (obviously). HOwever, I didn't realize the taping still went on.

Is this a mandatory thing?

I can't imagine that these thugs would allow their crimes to be recorded.

Did Fitz request WH tapes?

I haven't heard anything about bush standing behind a plant. We've always known that he has the brain of a potted ficus--but I never knew him to hide behind one. Learn something new every day!

I want this all to come out. I just hope I'm not disappointed.

Can you imagine the spin machine on steroids that will be released after Fitz talks? Rush Limbaugh will probably blow a gasket, playing offense on this one. Anything that brings that blowhard closer to having a coronary collapse--is just fine by me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #23
39. As far as I know, no
I had a hazy memory of someone saying something about something :evilgrin:, but that's probably just me. I only meant that this whole thing reminds me of Watergate/Vietnam/Nixon, it's bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #39
136. What about video tape - security cameras and the like?
Surely, every freaking room in the WH must have surveilence cameras. Could that be used in a court of law? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #136
146. No, they do not!
Do you think there are VIDEOTAPES of Monica?!

The S.S. knows by, essentially, GPS where the POTUS is, but NO CAMERAS!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
159. National security.
Remember all those cheney tapes and meeting reports, which were subpoened many times over - as well as other bushco criminal evidence.

They just ignored them all and still have them (if they haven't been destroyed long ago).

It will be interesting to see if they give them up for this one.

I won't hold my breath as long as the repukes control everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
31. Tapes? No.
I would say some internal dissenters who oppose the Crime Family have other resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
111. Do they still tape the oval office??
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 11:13 AM by FreedomAngel82
Maybe this is why Bush was at his Texas place a lot in his first term?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #111
115. You're correct
I have always surmised that all the nefarious activities in which these bastards engage are all concocted at the pig farm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #111
167. I think you mean spends almost HALF THE YEAR every year in Texas?!
NO doubt in my mind that Texas is where the REAL plans are made. And if there are tapes at the WH, I'm sure they will fight tooth and nail to not turn them over. Could this be why Roberts was so very quickly installed? Because Fitz would have to take the tape issue to the Supreme Court? My how convenient for the BFEE! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #167
185. Could be
I'm not sure if they still tape the Oval Office though but I always thought it strange how he met so many foreign leaders at his place instead of at the White House (the Saudi prince and Sharon). Maybe this is why on Roberts but I don't know myself. Remember that Bush answers to corporations too since they helped give him money to get to where he is. Dirty tricks isn't always enough. :shrug: So maybe Roberts was a thank you to them and to help protect himself and his father. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #111
221. You Betcha!
And some. Remember reading a report recently (out here somewhere) that he's spent more time at the ranch, away from the Oval Office then any Prez ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
192. Nope. AIR FORCE ONE TAPES!
Remember the subpoena for Air Force One phone records?

Every telephone conversation on Air Force One is taped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #192
207. Thanks for that Walt....you just refreshed my memory...
You are definitely on to something!

He did ask for the AF1 tapes.

Wow. Let's just hope there's something there.

This is just one scandal, among many crimes and evil deeds these bastard thugs have committed.

May this be the one that brings them down.

Thanks for reminding us that Fitz asked for the AF1 tapes. I think that is a very monumental point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
205. I think that was a John Dean anecdote about Nixon.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:37 AM
Original message
Let's hope the "source" has been questioned by Fitz.
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 10:45 AM by Toots
If news show hosts have this knowledge then rest assured so does the investigation or soon will. Wouldn't that be a humdinger if the whole damn lot of them charged with conspiracy to commit a felony. Better than a "misdemeanor" and quite possibly a "High Crime"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
73. Fitzgerald did get access to Air Force 1 phone records.
And all phone conversations on the plane are recorded, IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #73
145. All phone companies keep records of calls.
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 12:43 PM by WinkyDink
But were the Oval Office wired, there would have been no need to depose Bill Clinton; just play him the tapes to explain.

IOW, about tapes and surveillance cameras on the President: NO. NO. And NO.

He isn't spied on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #145
160. Not the Oval Office- Air Force 1.
I've read that all calls on Air Force 1 are recorded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #145
170. Ah, but perhaps * should be spied on! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
106. Steph must have extremely high confidence in his source...
... to drop a nuclear bomb like that on national television.

Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
134. Bush could have screwed himself in his "interview"
He was interviewed pretty early on as I remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #134
186. And wasn't he by himself too?
I think he was. With the 9/11 comission he didn't do it unless he was not under oath and with Cheney. Was he under any oath with this interview with Fitzgerald?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #186
190. The way I remember it was he had counsel present.
And it was done in the WH. Who knows for sure though. The story came out I think a couple of months after Bush was interviewed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. OMFG
It's a time warp back to the early 70's.

Please, Lord, give us a Democratic House of Representative in 2006. Give John Conyers subpena power. Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. No, please, Lord, give us
an entire admin that resigns in disgrace! O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #16
112. And off to the Hague!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. OMG- Please, please let this be true.............n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colbushwhacker_2000 Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. Now this is a 'bombshell"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. If ths true, how soon until impeachment hearings begin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colbushwhacker_2000 Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. We need to win back
.......then Congress in 06, then we will be able to pursue the impeachment of these evil bastards, that is if we don't have massive resignations prior to the midterm elections !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #24
122. When this starts to fall apart, it will do so in a big hurry,
all at once, like a dam failing. Get the popcorn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #17
114. Wouldn't they jail him before impeaching?
Since that is a crime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetm2475 Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
237. And The Revolution Begins...???!!!
Hey with the timing of any possible findings and/or indictments to be brought by Fitz (Oct 28), wouldn't it be great if just a week later (on Nov. 2), thousands of us take to the streets and call for impeachment? I'm sure you all know about this already, I'm kind of new to DU, but in case you haven't already, you should check out this site:

http://www.worldcantwait.org/

If congress doesn't want to do their jobs, maybe we can help persuade them. Maybe I'm just a dreamer but what are words without action?


:kick: :grr: :kick: :grr: :kick: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsUnited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
18. Please oh please oh please let this be true!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Z_I_Peevey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
19. Please, please let it be so.
Everybody wearing their seat belt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
20. Coach Hastert, you better start practicing your Oath of Office
you need some work on your enunciation, mumbling won't do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
209. I can hardly wait...
...for the Hastert administration to move into the White House!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
21. Of course they were involved. Did anyone really every think that they
weren't?????????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. but I don't recall any evidence before this
someone told Steph, that's the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #30
71. You are right, first we have heard of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
22. CIA Leak List
The 21 Administration Officials Involved in Exposing Plame
<http://www.thinkprogress.org/leak-scandal>

Thanks for the link to ThinkProgress - this is the first time I've visited and I've bookmarked it.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #22
213. Thanks for the list of those involved. That ThinkProgress site is
FAB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #22
226. no boLton on there?
tsk tsk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
27. Libby and Rove and Bolton or anyone else did not act on their own.
They are go-fers and arrangers. They don't make policy - they carry it out.

It's only logical that Cheney is involved. In most cases, it would be doubtful that Bush was involved because he is only the pretend President. However, his forte is revenge. And this was IN PART an act of revenge, but it was more an Act of eliminating those who knew about Cheney's involvement in nuclear and wmd business transactions through Pakistan.

All the other circumstantial facts are there:

They wanted that war.
They had to create a cause.
They had already had a failed forgery.
They were the ones to profit- in dollars and 'political capital'.
Cheney had to stop the findings of the CIA on his dealings.
They did not get the lie they wanted.
They ignored truth.
They coerced and arranged an entire administration lie for the SOTU, the United Nations, and supposedly, Congress and the Senate. And us and the Iraqi people.

I say it is a Cheney cover-up and a Bush revenge act. Libby, Rove, and Bolton are the 'arrangers'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #27
92. Bush knows exactly what's going on...don't play their "He's too dumb"
or "He's too holy" card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #92
179. I say he is a pretend President because I don't believe they tell him
everything. I don't think he is capable of knowing enough to create a war plan and a national and world strategy on his own. He can say what he wants, but I believe it comes from a very emotional juvenile level that moves into the criminal adult level when it E A S I L Y translates into terms that he gets - profit, legacy, loyalty, and revenge. I believe that when it gets into anything complicated, he can only get it if given a very simplified executive summary that is enhanced orally by Card, Rice, Rove, Gonzales and most especially Cheney. When it gets complicated, I believe, as hs been said, that he transfers authority to his team with pretend words such as - I trust you to do it and do it right (for the cabal).

His name was not on the 1998 letter to Pres Clinton in which Cheney, Wolfkowitz, Rumsfeld, Krystol, and many others asked Pres Clinton to go to war against Iraq. All those signers and more are the 'operators' for a larger cabal. We don't even know all the names of those who are calling the shots. Those we hear about are only the doers - the ones assigned to carry out the big guys plan. I don't believe this is a normal Republican Party. Maybe there never was.

Bush is the actor-pretend President solely used for the purpose of relating to a certain segment of their voting base.

All proof is out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #179
187. I think the opposite
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 05:27 PM by FreedomAngel82
I think all of his whole image is an act to protect him and him not get caught so someday his family can leave off where Bush left off. I just don't buy any of the act. The stupidity he does and the poor speech etc. Everything with Bush is an act, but I highly believe he is involved. He was talking about invading Iraq in 1999. You can read about that at http://www.informationclearinghouse.info I think he and his father do work together and are closer then what they want us to believe to protect his father. Just because his name wasn't on the letter doesn't mean anything. He could still be very involved without being apart of that. They wouldn't want to leave any trail of Bush being involved so he wouldn't go to prison and he could still keep his White House job and carry out the plans. I think everything they're doing comes from his father and they answer to him and he answers to Carlyle. Why before 9/11 would he have this whole stupid image and then the weeks following 9/11 had this pretty decent speech and aura about him and now he's back to being stupid? It's all just an act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #187
202. Yes to the act. But I think the act is to make him look like he's doing
the job. The agenda does not start with Carlyle. It is higher up. Think a consortium at the highest level of banking, investment, decades old moneyed people who are capable of funding the salaries and expenses of the foundations whose salaried retirees are the ones who come up with the plan. Some say it includes Royalty and the Vatican. It crosses borders just as the spy machines of the U.S. U.K., Canada, and Australia cross borders (they have the UK spying on us instead of us to avoid legal problems. We spy on their people.

The plan for us is to bring us down in privacy, opportunity, income, and freedom to the levels of third world countries so that their new serfs and slaves of the world are equalized, completely controlled, and at their mercy - so that immigration and worker requests and complaints are contained.

They have a plan that appears to mix the 'best' of communism, facism, nazism, dictatorship, technology, and science to 'take care of us'.

Did you hear the statement Bush made that Africans could be the world policemen. I remember it being somewhat in the context of sending in Africans to maintain calm in countries like Iraq. The way I read it is that Africans are dispensible. My guess is that he spouted off because of his limited ability to know better or to remember to be discreet.

Yes, I believe Cheney and Bush are down on the pole and that Bush has a unique position while Cheney and others are the ones who meet with the agenda makers and work out the details of their planned metamorphosis for us. At the same time he and the others position themselves for income. The agenda callers already had the wealth. Cheney and the others are making theirs out of moving between government and business and making sure that everything is done to make them more money (their reward.)

Bush is only the actor (I prefer marionette) and not an agenda maker. How could he go from having everything done for him to doing it for everyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogfacedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #187
241. Nope. Bush is a puppet President who's in over his head.
This isn't to say he's completely benign. He's a part of that culture through and through. He is, though, the frontman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #27
116. Exactly
Remember that Bush was talking about going into Iraq in 1999 when he was campaigning for president. Check it out: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1221.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #116
180. See my reply immediately above - 179. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
28. And their was dancing in the street
:bounce:

:beer:

:wow:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
astonamous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. Damn...it's Sunday and the liquer stores are all closed. I might
have to drive to Nevada today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #32
62. Atrios has two bottles of champaign chilling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
29. Kick, nominate, and mediablast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
33. As if...
...this sort of "outing" could be done without Bush and/or Cheney's knowledge. Let's hope this is true and clearly spelled out in the indictments...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Cheney.
Bet he's a barrel of fun to be with right about now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #37
64. bet you're right
Do they keep mice and small animals around whose heads he can bite off when the mood strikes him?

For that matter, I'll wager W is in a freaking petulant fit right now, probably pretty boozed up. Betcha that stupid sonofabitch is wanting to start pushing red buttons because he's having a tantrum over what he doesn't completely understand is the collapse of his entire corrupt administration.

Hey, Dick, W, Tom, Bill? Suffer. Then go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #37
124. OHHH HELL THEY HAVE BEEN HAVING A POW WOW
ON THE SPIN THEY WILL USE...look delay was in action with the spin pronto..they know who will be indicted or they are pretty darn sure...they have the spin down to a science...we just need to have ours ready in return...and the dems in congress better damn well be ready as well...( i wish i had more confidence in that!)

look this morning rubin said pnac was a conspiracy to a call about pnac...they will play this to the base and fuck the rest of us as always..so we better be ready..i am currently compling all this info..we need to all do that...and start sending it out to all the repugs we know now..to beat them at the spin game!
start educating others who know nothing of this now...just send it to anyone and everyone on your email list so they have some clue..most are not like us who are informed...most people live with their heads in a cloud..so let em all have it now..so they are prepared for this info!! and for the indictments..i am sending to all dem clubs i belong to so they are all aware..and don't think they are...i was end of last month at a new dem club and only a couple of the 200 there knew anything about pnac!
so this stuff is over most americans heads!!

get it out there now..to everyone you know!!
we need our own talking points to send out now!! talking points of the truth!!

fly:grouphug: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
34. Source = Rove red herring
This stinks like a Rovian ploy to get people all in a tizzy and then when it's later proved to be false, the messenger gets the blame, taking the attention away from who's really guilty here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Yep, this has the earmarks of clasic Rove scheme.
It was my first thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #34
41. Maybe, though I don't see the benefit of falsely naming the Preznit
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 10:23 AM by Mr_Spock
It's always been considered bad to even have one's name mentioned in a conspiracy because people will assume he's guilty even if he's not indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #41
50. The benefit is making it look like a partisan witch hunt.
You can hear it now, "They hate this president so much, they even falsely acused Mr. Bush of being a co-conspirator in the leak probe. That just proves this is about tearing down President Bush."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #50
56. Perhaps, but nobody is accusing the Preznit - who was the source?
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 10:34 AM by Mr_Spock
...and why would it be bad to report on what a source told you? Stephanopoulis is one of the most careful (perhaps excessively) Sunday show hosts that I've ever seen. He hardly seems like a likely dupe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #56
72. Even so, I would encourage caution....
I don't exactly trust Stephanopoulis 100 percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #72
78. Caution? I always assume the "rumors" will end up being false
I just enjoy the fact the he has fallen so much in people's eyes that even stating such a rumor is possible. This is a sign that Bush has lost almost all respect in this country. It doesn't matter if it's true - that's my point. I don't understand why Rove would even want people to have such a low regard for his Boy King? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #78
105. I would agree with that. What really makes me mistrust this rumor....
...is that Bush just isn't bright enough to try that kind of political retaliation that is the Plame leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #78
118. I don't know myself
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 11:27 AM by FreedomAngel82
He works in the opposite direction. He makes someone's strength their weakness (their opponients). Plus, why would he risk his career for something like this? He could be Dan Rathered or worse. His career would be over. So I don't think this is a Karl Rove ploy. Here is a good quote from Think Progress about this with Bush: STARR DEPUTY SAID BUSH INTERVIEW SUGGESTED HIGH-LEVEL INVOLVEMENT IN LEAK: The New York Daily News reported, “The Bush interview ‘indicates there’s obviously a belief that the leak was at a high level,’ said Sol Wisenberg, a former Starr deputy who questioned Clinton. ‘The President usually doesn’t meet and knock around ideas with midlevel staffers.’” (http://www.thinkprogress.org/leak-scandal#bush )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #72
80. I agree, I'm holding out with cautious optimism
I'm not going to jump the gun on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #80
85. I totally agree that we should not believe the actual rumor
It's the fact that a respected Sunday show host (Republican at work says that Steph... has "seen the light") would even say such a thing. This really is a big deal to me just based on the source. I expect he will weasel out of any indictment (he can't be indicted anyway, can he?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #85
86. It is logical to assume the worst from this culture of corruption
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #86
88. Well, hearing this news doesn't make me feel the least bit manipulated
If this is the best "spin" Rove can put on this story (remember that almost nobody outside of DU and FR even talk about this story), then I'll burn in this hell any day of the week.

Rove should resign if this is the best spin he can put on this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #50
117. They'd do that anyways
Look at with Tom DeLay. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #34
52. I thought of that too!!!
Yes, it does seem Rovian.

Maybe Cheney is involved and they're attempting to quell the shock of Cheney's crimes.

If they put the rumor out there, that Bush is involved--and he's not and it's Cheney--it will seem like less of a scandal.

On the other hand---Fitz has kept VERY tight lipped about all of this. WE've heard a great deal lately about Cheney. Maybe all of this rumbling about Cheney (and now Bush) is an effort to make the scandal seem not so greasy--if it's just Bolton or Libby.

I wouldn't put it past them!!!

Also, they like to leak false information to cloud the issues. If we're all saying Cheney and Bush today--they can later prove these items false and then declare that the entire investigation is flawed and full of rumors and false innuendo.

BASTARDS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #52
65. I am sorry that this government has made people so paranoid
Now I'm not supposed to enjoy the possibility that Cheney and or Bush may have been involved in the leak because Karl Rove may be trying to manipulate the story (pure speculation I might add)? Oh, well, it seemed like an awesome revelation ten minutes ago - now I'm pessimistic paranoid and depressed again based on this possibility :D

:D:D:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #34
95. scheme
I'm not so sure George S. would fall for such a scheme, after what happened to Dan Rather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #95
120. Exactly
Remember that Rather said there was fear in the news room. So I don't think he would risk it either. One can hope. I wonder why they told about this though since Fitzgerald has had this case very tight-lipped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #120
128. George S.
Plus that, it became apparent after the Dan Rather fiasco that it was network executives that decided to go with the story. George S. mentioned that he has a source in an almost gossipy way, as if his decision to drop the bombshell was facilitated by knowledge from a trusted source, rather than management fiat. I wonder if his source is the Big Dog himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #128
189. Would he know though??
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #128
211. What an angle enid602, the Big Dog himself!
Now that would be a source we'd all like it to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #34
162. Also part of the Rove EXPECTATIONS GAME
if it then turns out not to be true, the impact of the truth is lessened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baconfoot Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
168. Everything that sounds good for us sounds like a classic Rove Scheme
They can't ALL be classic Rove schemes can they?

I have been waiting two years for this!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #168
182. I can't believe that some people think that Rove is responsible.
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 04:59 PM by higher class
He could not do something like this on his own. The blame lies higher up on the pole.

Think about this.

Cheney is the person who had the most to gain by ending Plame's work.
But it was Bush on that aircraft with the super secret personnel file on Plame.
It was quite beneficial that Cheney wasn't there because we may never have proof that Cheney gave orders to Libby at the same time that Bush gave orders to Rove.

The only part of this that might make its way into a legal case is the stuff that happened on AF1 on that trip to Africa.... i.e., Bush.

We're looking at President Cheney with or without a cane because the Cheney motivation for bringing down Plame and her cover company is probably not in the venue of a Fitzgerald investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #182
193. Wasn't Cheney going to the FBI a lot though?
Has anyone who was at the FBI at that point in time been questioned about what Cheney was doing there? I still think if Bolton or any of them get caught they have a good chance at spilling the beans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #193
203. He was going to the CIA and trying to fix the causes for war (from what.
I read.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
35. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
38. even if it is true, which I believe it is, what makes you think it will go
anywhere?

I have no confidence in the media to pursue this, and are you telling me the democrats are finally going to get some courage?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #38
51. Media blast now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #38
70. It's not up to the media. It's up to the grand jury. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #70
83. Up to a point
let's assume the grand jury indictes at least rove. If that happens I have no doubt that bush will immediately pardon rove before it goes to trial. I don't believe the grand jury can indict * or cheney since that is what impeachment is for, and the only way that would happen is if the democrats grew a spine, the repukes saw the light, and the media decided to do their jo

I hope I am wrong


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #83
149. The GJ can indict anybody.
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 12:49 PM by WinkyDink
Said indictment would then lead, presumably and in a just world, to the commencement of impeachment proceedings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
40. I'm putting the finishing touches on my film "Rove's War"
right now, expect to ship in a few days, and I've spent many months researching for this, it weighs in as a 2 DVD set at 150 minutes of definitive info on the entire Plame case, A complete Chronology, forged documents, the meeting in Dec of 2001 with Leeder, and Italian SISME (CIA) leaders, forgers, etc - Suskind's info that Bush was pushing for war way way back in 1999, Bolton and Rummy's ROGUE Intel, all mixed down with the Downing Street Minutes, Ex CIA Hearings, etc, etc..

THis is RED MEAT for political junkies and it's all there, plus some hilarious additions of graphics, cartoons, Jon Stewart grilling folks, etc to keep it fun at the same time - anyone that's seen my flash work, imagine my best flash amplified about 100 times and you'll see what I've got coming out of the DVD burner in a few days.

Some here donated a long time ago (and I apologise for being REALLY sick for a good month) but this is for you, and it's rolling out to the mailroom very soon - even wrote and performed a satirical song (which I think I'm going to release at the same time on the web, maybe send it to Al Franken, my pal Mike Malloy would probably play it, maybe Randi too) called "Secret Agent Plame" based on the old classic "Secret Agent Man" for the credits..

Once I've shipped to everyone I promised this film to, I'm going to hit up Skinner and see if I can use it to fund raise here..

I can't stop watching it and I should be bored as hell with it after editing and researching for months on end, going through hundreds of hours of film - it's my best..

Just getting the word out, that it'll be available at Takebackthemedia.com after I make my customers happy Look for it should I get the nod from Skinner (who will of course receive a Comp Copy for keeping us all sane :) )

Get out your popcorn and fasten your seatbelts, it's going to be a bumpy ride - these guys are like tapeworms, they'll insist on practically killing the HOST to get rid of them..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. I'll definitely buy
numerous copies .... the holidays are coming up, and I'm going to be gift-wrapping your work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. Thanks!
I don't think I've even cashed the check from your donations H2O, I was so sick I wasn't sure if I was going to go under the knife, and if I had to get opened up and recover for months I was going to just send everyone their money back..

I think you'll enjoy the attention to detail.. even at 150 minutes there are still some loose threads that you can't add, or it would be a 4 hour film! But this one is packed..

And no tin foil stuff here, I did the real investigative reporter thang :)

Appreciate your support friend.

sym
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #40
63. I was wondering what happen to that DVD I ordered long time ago.
Now, I know. You are doing a great job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #63
96. I am sooo sorry rainscents
I was having freaking gall bladder problems, constantly sick, couldn't eat, made two emergency trips to the doctor and hospital (no health insurance of course) and they were talking about opening me up..

Even while on the verge of screaming I was still doing three or four hours of editing, etc in the middle of the night, dragging myself to the screen - now I'm better and have been working for a few weeks all night long.

Just need to add a sountrack, output it to DVDs and then mass produce and ship, so it will be VERY soon.. besides I really wanted to make the definitive work on this, and I think I have :)

Thanks so much for your patience and understanding, I'm not the kind of guy to rip folks off, rather died trying..

appreciate it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #40
178. when you market it.. let me know. . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #40
218.  PM me with information on this...
I request this so that I have a record that I can get to. I'm at work and unable to save such information.

This definitely sounds very interesting!


Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
43. Is George S. asking to be deposed?
Interesting turn of events.

Were I Fitz, I would subpoena Steph immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cygy2k Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
46. Remember
I think you must remember that Bush & Cheney were involved simply by knowing about Plame/Wilson. That doesn't mean that they directly ordered Rover and/or Libby to squel about her. My point is that we can't get worked up over all these little hints that are made to raise viewership and ratings. I can word that line so many ways but the truth of it might never change.

Us democrats have had most of our problems because we jump the gun and want everything to be true and it back-fires on us. Just wait until we get the report and we'll see to what level this goes. I would be very surprised if Bush is even mentioned in the report, unfortunately. I would love nothing more than for him to go up the river.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #46
53. Report.
There may not be any "report."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #46
58. thanks--well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #46
194. And also with them
They didn't do anything to stop it. If they knew what was going on they had the obligation to stop it but they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
48. ya right-
my source told me the tooth fairy was whispering in georges ear...or was that condi? dam there are just to many "sources" to keep track of
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
49. Can anyone verify this? Who watched this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. I should be able to shortly.
The show is at the half way point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #54
59. Let us know when you have, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #54
66. also, what did the old crusty republican say in response...
please since I missed it on the east coast?!

thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #49
69. I watched it - that's exactly what he said
Threw it in just as they were closing the segment, so no follow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #69
89. We have confirmation. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #49
84. yep.
Thats what George S. said alright.

Then they discussed how this would come out, in a report by Fitzgerald perhaps? And George Will pointed out that we should know something when the grand jury term ends on the 28th of this month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #84
94. I bet we get clues before than, like this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #49
113. I just watched it on Tivo
And it was exactly as the OP describes. pretty interesting no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dooner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #49
132. I watched the show and heard the same thing n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
55. bazaroworld; talking plame during campaign; we knew bush was
in the chat and we wanted kerry and other dems to say it out loud. yet bush would dismiss plame part and say he was lookin to find who did this

during the campaign. bush told us he was lookin for the people as he sat there during plame meeting listening to how they were going to get 'em. we all knew he knew. we all knew he sat on plane with powell, cheney, fleshcer?, hughes, matlin and others and they planned this out. their mentality is stupid 13 yr old stupid boy shit. lots of hee hee going on

so

what we have to angle story is bush knowingly lied to the public, and another elected on lie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
57. I just media blasted DC, NY, and Georgia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #57
61. Mediablast all 50 states, here, now, it is up to us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #61
77. Come on, other states...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #77
91. I am serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #91
97. Seriousness defined
Main Entry: se·ri·ous
Pronunciation: 'sir-E-&s
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English seryows, from Middle French or Late Latin; Middle French serieux, from Late Latin seriosus, alteration of Latin serius weighty, serious; probably akin to Old English swr heavy, sad
1 : thoughtful or subdued in appearance or manner : SOBER
2 a : requiring much thought or work <serious study> b : of or relating to a matter of importance <a serious play>
3 a : not joking or trifling : being in earnest b archaic : PIOUS c : deeply interested : DEVOTED <a serious musician>
4 a : not easily answered or solved <serious objections> b : having important or dangerous possible consequences <a serious injury>
5 : excessive or impressive in quantity, extent, or degree : CONSIDERABLE <making serious money> <serious drinking>

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=serious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #97
110. Ok, if 17 of us send to 3 states, we will have blanketed the press
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #110
164. Ok, time to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #164
199. DUue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob H. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
60. Did Fitzgerald ever question Stephanopoulos?
I hope that whoever his source was, s/he wasn't the only one who knew about Bush and Cheney's involvement. I also wonder whether Stephanopoulos would pull a Miller and go to jail rather than reveal the name of whoever it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #60
67. My guess is Fitz knows more than stepocockaless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
68. Remember when McClellan said,
"If anyone in this administration was involved in it, they would no longer be in this administration"?

I'm sorry, Mr. Bush- but you can no longer be a part of the Bush Administration. LMFAO.

God, I hope this is true. They will be publicly roasted and then impeached and publicly roasted again if it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #68
74. I would literally dance in my Repub county street! Justice be done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
76. Two points Miller made at her press conference
I knew that the media would *ONLY* pick up on her first point.

1) she needed the personal release from source (scooter libby)
2) she needed fitzgerald to agree to only question her about her conversations with (scooter libby) and no other WH sources.

Nobody is picking up on the more important point 2) which is, by omission revealing who she is still protecting.

Bolton? Bush? Cheney? Rove? who knows? Fitzgerald and Miller I guess, and probalby Bush and Cheney, as well as everyone else on the cabinet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #76
82. And me and you soon I hope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #76
104. I think Cheney. My intuition says she is tied to Cheney.
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 11:00 AM by Stephanie


She printed whatever the neo-cons told her. Her alleged source for most of the disinfo was Chalabi. Chalabi is a neo-con out of the Univ. of Chicago, tied to Wolfie and Perle. That whole neo-con PNAC crew was in cahoots - for various motivations - to remake the ME. Who was at the top of the heap? Cheney. I think Miller is closely connected to Dick Cheney, not just Libby.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #104
108. I think your intuition is right
...and having watched the meet the press show and searched around the major sunday editorials, don't you think its a bit predictable that noone in the media has picked up on her second point? the part about securing fitzgerald's agreement to narrow testimony.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #104
147. Judy Was/Is Cheney's Mistress
Been saying it since June. I'd make book on it. Then I'd lay down $5000 on the Miller/Cheney exacta.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #147
183. What if she is Lynn's mistress? Could be where she gets her
material for her books? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #76
223. Right, TWO reasons
Reason TWO was the real reason, The other was just thrown in to get her some sympathy in the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
87. Hey, this post doesn't have 100 votes yet
I say we give this one at least 100 :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #87
90. Yes, we need to get our organizers in here and toast this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #87
196. Only 51 Greatest votes?
C'mon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
98. I want to be post # 100!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
99. I am I am post # 100! wee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
100. wait, here we go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #100
102. Thank you, Thank you very much, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
103. Wow!
What a bomb! I hope this is true! I wouldn't be surprised. Especially if Bush is involved. This would show he's been involved in everything since the beginning (I knew he had been from what we've been told).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
119. For us west coasters
I want to watch this show. But before I do somebody tell me is Pukie Roberts on it? I can't watch if she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
121. ding ding ding...
thats the hammer of justice banging these cronies upside the head, ive been waiting for this for a long time...lets hope the truth sets us free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
123. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
125. VIDEO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #125
126. Thanks for the link.
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #125
127. oh boy
thanks for the clip. :D missing out on all the fun here in the UK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
130. Trying to raise expectations so the report or indictments of just a few
don't look so bad? Don't know. Let's wait for the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
131. The outing of Valarie Plame was planned on AF1
during Bush's trip to Africa in 2003. Only a handful of key staff went. It was from here that the calls went out to Rove and Libby to get Wilson and out his wife. Bush was not only in the loop, he started the loop. Bush will probably be cited has an unindicted co-conspirator.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #131
139. Didn't Fitz get the phone logs & faxes from AF 1?
HMMMMMMMM?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
133. I want to know who sold out POTUS & VPOTUS.
That would have to be extremely high in the cabal and with evidence beyond just hearing! They also will have to cop to a lesser charge, just like Iran Contra, Watergate, Franklin...

Oh I like today, I really do...:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #133
135. Someone who is probably scared shitless as to where Bushco has
taken and is taking our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #135
142. They have to be scared personally to sell out the BFEE.
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 12:34 PM by Pithy Cherub
They signed on for the political corrupt agenda with no loss of sleep. they have to fear losing freedom from jail, loss of reputation and loss of standing in the power realm. That's the only thing that makes these republican cockroaches move.

Susan MacDougal stood her ground and nary a republican has the foundation of Truth that she had.;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #142
165. I agree on all accounts. BTW.. Susan MacDougal is a personal hero
of mine. What Ken Starr tried to do to her was beyond unconscionable.


There have been and do believe there are, many Democrats that have been corrupt, yet I cannot think of one who has ever been truly evil like the sociopath and his minions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #142
234. BFEE?
I can figure out most of the acronyms and abbreviations, and have seen just about every "nickname" applied to *, but this one is new to me...all I can think of is "Bush Forces of Evil" but it's short an E....

Is that perhaps "Eeeeeeevill", a la Bela Lugosi?

Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #234
235. Bush Family Evil Empire
Welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Scarecrow Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #133
230. Maybe someone on the agency side...
The NSA or CIA? I don't know the psych profiles of these people but I would have to guess they are whip-smart, have long memories, stick together like Krazy Glue, and have been absolutely f-ing furious at this outing. Especially at the field-level, I imagine that these guys and women are super un-partisan, knowing that their lives always depend on a delicate web of secrecy from a wide variety of people.

Political retaliation probably doesn't bother them as much when it doesn't threaten the country's security. But this was a big middle finger to all agents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
137. okay, this is probably a dumb question
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 12:14 PM by senseandsensibility
but after georgie issued this tortured shocker in which he appears to me to be trying to downplay the situation, what was the reaction? Didn't any of the journalists, as they insist on calling themselves, question him about it? :sarcasm: I'm sure they went into spasms trying to get to the bottom of it. I agree that this seems to be a major newsflash, but as always with the lapdogs, it will not be reported or commented on if it adversely affects chimperor. So, as many wise DUers have stated before, we have to wait and see what Fitz says. Let's hope we hear something soon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
138. Question for the posters in this thread: If the Bush and Cheney are....
...indicted by Fitz's Grand Jury, do they have to step aside just like Delay was forced to step aside?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #138
140. Short legal answer is no. However; the political parallel
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 12:27 PM by Pithy Cherub
is Watergate by virtue of an accumulation of evidence that would put 2006 wingnut rule in jeopardy would certainly make it a highly viable "choice". Secondly, the republicans would have to commit hari kari or pubbie fratricide by telling them they had to go for the "good of the country." Additionally democrats (the few non-wimpy ones) would need to put together a strong concise narrative on all of the corruption that should be communicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
141. I just hope it's true
If this comes out into the mainstream, one thing Bush & Cheney may succeed in doing is making sure Americans never trust their own government again for generations to come.

Now, if several people in the administration are indicted over this, and Bush/Cheney are unindicted co-conspirators... what happens? My guess is they try to throw so much BS out there that nobody knows what to believe. But, do enough Repubs cross the line & vote to start impeachment proceedings?

Hopefully, we can pick up a few seats in the House & Senate next year because of it, too.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #141
144. I'll believe indictments of Bush and Cheney
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 12:41 PM by nvliberal
when I see it.

Hoping Bush and Cheney will be removed over something as relatively trivial as Plamegate is wishful thinking taken to the nth degree.

As I've said in another post, if the fallout from Katrina, a far worse scandal than some Nixon-style revenge story, doesn't cause the top two in our government to resign let alone be impeached, THIS sure as hell isn't going to do it.

The Republicans in Congress are thoroughly corrupt, and because they control the institution, there's no chance in hell Bush and Cheney will be removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #144
150. there's a lot more involved with the Plame Outing than revenge
H20 Man, Robert Paulsen & Me. and others can fill you in a lot more than me... but, it is not just revenge. Revenge is minor compared to the other things involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #144
151. I don't think you CAN indict a sitting prez. They could be unindicted
conspirators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #151
154. I think that is undetermined.
That last guy on the graveyard shift of Clinton's Independent Counsels was making like he might could indict, before the Big Dog finally wised up and took a deal.

IIRC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cats Against Frist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #144
177. Right, because TREASON is trivial.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #144
220. What the hell are you smoking?
The Plame affair is anything but trivial! More importantly, it ties directly into the elective war in Iraq. If that's trivial, you're out of your bloody damn mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
astonamous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
143. The response of the panel to what Stephanopoulos said
was a little disappointing. Did George slip it in there just to see what reaction he would get and when no one responded he just let it go? I mean, if I would have been on the panel, I would have jumped up and asked him to repeat himself or clarify his statement. Something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #143
153. I think the non-reaction of the panel is because
they were NOT suprised. You and I are, because this is the first time we have heard of it. The panel's attitude was so ho-hum that it made me think this has probably been out in the media world for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
148. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
152. Let's hope Fitzgerald has the same source
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 01:14 PM by Jack Rabbit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #152
157. if he doesn't
then Steph should expect to be hearing from Fitzgerald very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
155. Hooo boy - pass the popcorn!
And I hope those involved in exposing this "STAY AWAY FROM SMALL AIRPLANES"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
158. The Dems need the House.
Treason>Stained Blue Dress=Impeachment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #158
173. Dems need to move on OUTLAWING secret code in voting machines
...Voting machines that are OWNED by 4 republican companies... and companies that keep electing a republican house and senate (not to mention, president).

We CANNOT get a Democratic majority in both houses as long as we keep using the republican's voting machines.

It WILL. NOT. HAPPEN.

It's not who casts the votes. It's who COUNTS the votes that matters in an election.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #173
215. We need Dems to campaign on the voting machine issues
However, this is all an aside to the story of this thread about Plame-gate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
161. Did this come from the mouth of Stephanopolous, ON AIR?
Please say this is so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #161
166. This is so.
I saw it & tivo'd it even. It may be on some video blog site already...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #161
171. See post #125.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
169. That doesn't shock me at all.
I'm just surprised that someone leaked it. :wow:

Heads are gonna roll. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
172. I want to be post # 200!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
174. If this is true, then it is all over for the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #174
191. I wish I could be that optimistic.
The Repuke Controlled Congress won't impeach him, even if Bush is shown to have been complicit in TREASON.

They just won't do it, imho.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #191
197. Politically they will be finished.
They will be down the very looniest of the loony support after something like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
176. Interesting. That might explain the sudden
falling off of the wagon and the general haggard look of the Chimp in Chief. That makes Bush, Cheney, Delay and Frist possibly going for the ride. Who does that leave us with as POTUS? Condi? The next few months are going to be really interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #176
195. I thought it went Haskert (sp) and then BYRD!!!

Condi wasn't in the mix!!

I think Byrd would be the coolest ~ he would drive the Rethugs crazy cause he knows the Constitution! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #195
222. Byrd is no where that close to the presidency in line...
The first Democrat in line is the Secretary of Transportion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #222
224. I saw it in a thread here at DU


I was shocked!
As I recall, no one corrected it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #224
228. If I had seen that thread, I would have corrected it.
The line of succession is as follows:

• The Vice President Richard Cheney
• Speaker of the House John Dennis Hastert
• President pro tempore of the Senate(1) Ted Stevens
• Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
• Secretary of the Treasury John Snow
• Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld
• Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
• Secretary of the Interior Gale A. Norton
• Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns
• Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez(2)
• Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao(3)
• Secretary of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt
• Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Alphonso Jackson
• Secretary of Transportation Norman Yoshio Mineta
• Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman
• Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings
• Secretary of Veterans Affairs Jim Nicholson
• Secretary of Homeland Security(4) Michael Chertoff

(1) The president pro tempore presides over the Senate when the vice president is absent. By tradition the position is held by the senior member of the majority party.
(2) Carlos Gutierrez was born in Cuba and is ineligible.
(3) Elaine Chao was born in Taiwan and is ineligible.
(4) In late July 2005, the Senate passed a bill moving the Homeland Security secretary to number 8 on the list. The bill is awaiting House approval.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0101032.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #228
229. God save our country


Maybe we will have a woman president after all (condi.)

If they keep going down the line, it could happen.

OMG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #229
232. Eeeekkk.... Condi!
That liar! Please God no!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
198. 200th?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
200. 200 posts! On Fire! Let Justice be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #200
201. Well-played, usregimechange!
:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #200
214. Pathetic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
204. I always thought that the Chimp was involved
Whoever decided to get a Wilson through his wife was nasty, vicious and none too bright.

Sound like anyone we know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
206. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
208. This better be the real deal, George!
:) :toast: :smoke: :dunce: :headbang: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
210. I find myself almost giddy at the prospect of more and more indictments.
I can barely contain myself. I told my husband tonight we would lead a conga line through our neighborhood when and if these indictments come down. Party on Wayne..calling out to all the world are you ready for a brand new beat.....CONGA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
212. as vindictive as they are in general makes plenty sense to me...
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
216. some of us never needed stephanopoulus or his source to know that the bush
boy and cheney were involved in the outing of PLAME... we know it, knew it, from day one... you just have to look at the bushes standard way of operating.

covert activities.
smear the truth.
target their opponents.
and then ... obscure and
deny! deny! deny!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
225. I'm not buying Bush involvement but I am buying Cheney's involvement
Here's why.

Personally, I think that Bush has absolutely no involvement in the day to day operations other than being the face of the Bush Regime. I've always suspected that the reason Bush takes so much vacation is because he has nothing to do all day so the people running the administration would rather have Bush on vacation then meddling around the White house. Bush's purpose with this goverment is simple - give a few speeches a year (memorized), answer a few press conferences (scripted and pre-selected questions) do a few photo-ops (with pre-selected friendly people) and stay the hell out of the day-to-day operations.

But Cheney IS one of the people running the goverment but since he scares people with just that damn snarl it's best to keep him hidden someplace safe where he can make the day-to-day decisions. So without a doubt Cheney knew and was involved with the decision. If Bush knew anything it was probably just an afterthought to mention something like "We've dealt with Joe Wilson coming out against you"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joey Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
227. This could be bigger than Warergate n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
233. and he'll go to jail to protect that source!
his hair, however, will squeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
236. and the Corporate Media follow-up to this is where? Soladad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gronk Groks Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
238. Please Divinity, make it so...
...to busy to get to this before now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
239. Reinforcing hope: B*sh hired criminal attorney months ago re Plame nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonkra Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
240. Yeahsure...
and if you believe that, you probably even believe that Junior's asshole dad and that drooling dumbass Reagan were at meetings discussing Iran/Contra arms to the Ayatollah in return for American hostages. C'mon... I'm sure Dub and his Dick weren't "in the loop", because that would be downright traitorous and probably even treasonable for anybody who thought nobody was above the law and was just trying to restore honor and dignity to the White House so nobody would ever even think about trying to exercise their libido their ever again. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC