|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Melodybe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 02:52 PM Original message |
This thread is stupid and counter productive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyesroll (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
1. What? Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadisonProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 02:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. That's my understanding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melodybe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 02:57 PM Original message |
Until the dems call out ES&S and Diebold it is a pipe dream anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. Three words: Three Judge Panel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyesroll (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:14 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. What does this have to do with getting an impeachment through the House? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-05 07:19 AM Response to Reply #21 |
28. "Through the House", maybe nothing. "**To** the House", everything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'd like to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyesroll (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 02:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Tear gas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 02:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Yell and jump around like the guy from Rage Against The Machine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geomon666 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. How about vote no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Why cast a "symbolic" no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geomon666 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:43 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Well if that's the case why bother voting at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 09:12 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. It's math |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geomon666 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 10:03 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Well I've got some news for you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DefenseLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 10:23 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Thanks for the news, but you didn't really answer my question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geomon666 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-30-05 10:29 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Byrd has been attacking bush left and right for 5 years now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. Please refrain from rational thought on this issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fenris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
4. Shouldn't that be "Impeachment continues to be a pipe dream"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
6. The saddest part of impeachment is that even if it succeeded, that would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shrek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
7. It's a pipe dream with or without him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
9. Impeachment was never a viable option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. How exactly would impeachment have been easier if Roberts had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
11. Thanks Dems? When we are the minority party shit like this happens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seansky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
14. i just can't believe this. I think the 06 elections might force some reps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Melodybe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Forget this thread I'm angry and I don't know what I am talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. hiya honey... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
16. Impeachment is the pipe dream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zomby Woof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
20. Impeachment was ALWAYS a pipe dream |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:18 PM Response to Original message |
22. Learn Procedure please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
second edition (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-29-05 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
23. We never would have been able to defeat him and he is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:12 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC