Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN reporting: Davis NOT conceding yet. THAT WHORE WOLFIE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 11:24 PM
Original message
CNN reporting: Davis NOT conceding yet. THAT WHORE WOLFIE
sayinmg its all done.

But the numbers show the recall vote is narrowing


One million nay to recall and 1.23 FOR recall.

19% reporting


but a few minutes ago with 16% reporting the yes votes were more than 250,000 more. The percentages are closing.

It is NOT over. The media runs the exit polling. Jesse Jackson says there were dirty tricks.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. hey, only 55-45, Davis should just play it cool
I guess some morans did forget to check YES on the ballot :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. It would be great if Wolf and Tweety had to eat some crow...
Hopefully enough to choke on!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. As of 9:20
Edited on Tue Oct-07-03 11:32 PM by Paulie
http://vote2003.ss.ca.gov/Returns/status.htm

There are very large counties (like LA) that have barely started getting totals in (10% turnout so far).

There is more outstanding than the 10% spread on the recall question.

It's going to be a long night. Davis should just go to bed and see what the totals are in the morning.

Statewide showing a 14.6% turnout? It's going to be atleast 50%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BevHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hell yes there were dirty tricks. I hope they wait as long as possible
Edited on Tue Oct-07-03 11:40 PM by BevHarris
Dirty trick: "forgetful" voter registration for Dems and progressives, forcing them to vote on "provisional ballots" and then giving them envelopes too small for the ballot, so they have to fold it (ballot says "do not fold" -- because the optical scan may not be able to read it!) This also has the effect of delaying the counting of these votes, which may run as high as 90 percent against Arnold, making it appear that the margins are different than they really are.

I have a report (working on confirming it) from a VERY credible source, that modems may have been hooked up to machines while the election was live. Without looking at the paper ballots on the optical scans, who knows what was done.

I have memos from the programmer of the optical scan, that pass the word about uploading and overwriting vote counts with new ones.

The truth is, we have no idea what's happening in California, and the propensity to assume that just because some stats showed up on a TV camera the votes were cast that way is just naive.

How about we find out what happened first? Remember, on Nov 5, 2002, everyone said that the Georgia election went off without a hitch. Now look at the mess it turned out to be. Wait for the evidence, and while you're at it, go do a little investigating.

Bev Harris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. it isn't over
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. never say die!!!
Edited on Tue Oct-07-03 11:39 PM by burr
wait until the last absentee ballot is counted, and the last verdict is made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. 55-45 now and shrinking
i'm here until 3am. this isnt over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Alameda Cnty Hasn't Reported Yet
and 40% of SF precincts have reported

That's about another 200k No votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LalahLand Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Would they stop counting the votes if Davis concedes?
Just wondering. And if he concedes and he actually turns out to have more votes, is it too late to take back the office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BevHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Thug strategy #4305b: Force a premature concession
Edited on Wed Oct-08-03 12:01 AM by BevHarris
Like they tried to do with Gore. If Davis steps in front of everyone and concedes, it won't matter what the facts are. I hope he toughs it out -- here is a preview of what you will read in a later chapter of Black Box Voting: The real story behind calling the election for Bush (on Fox TV, by his cousin, based on a sudden and surprising 16,000 vote spread) and Gore's near-concession (he'd written his speech, called Bush to concede, and was on his way to concede publicly when a little birdie told him it was all bullshit) -- Ed Bradley, of 60 Minutes, was an unsung hero that night, when he rang the bells...Fire, Foes, Alert Alert...

And Gore pissed of the Bushistas royally by withdrawing his concession.

I fervently hope Gray Davis waits until the absentee and provisional ballots are fully counted and all examinations and audits of the machine tallies are done.

ON EDIT: Oh well. He conceded.

Bev
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Candidates should not concede until the day after the election, at

the earliest. Both parties ought to insist on an end to the media calling for concessions based on projections. (An end to projections would be OK, too. Some of us remember the excitement of listening to the vote tallies come in and trying to make our own projections. Patience is a virtue. I'll bet Wolf Blizer and his ilk open their gifts on December 23.)

The alternative, judging from the way things have been going, is that we'll see candidates conceding before a single vote is cast, based just on polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-07-03 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good for Davis
it's a big state, and TV has been known to be wrong in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's been shrinking all night
It isn't over until all the votes are counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
15. How many absentee ballots are there?
and how many are from dems who wanted to make sure their vote was not fudged by electronic voting machines?

I heard 2 million absentee ballots but I don't recall where, and it seems unrealistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC