Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Transcript of Olbermann's remarks about O'Reilly, Franken, and dissent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kayleybeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 03:43 PM
Original message
Transcript of Olbermann's remarks about O'Reilly, Franken, and dissent
If you missed this when it aired on Countdown with Keith Olbermann, you owe it to yourself to read the transcript. AWESOME commentary.

Excerpted from 'Countdown with Keith Olbermann' Sept. 29 transcript

Complete transcript at: http://www.msnbc.com/news/973847.asp?cp1=1

<snip>
OLBERMANN: Before we get to the top of tonight's COUNTDOWN, a story that kind of sets it up.

The lawsuit against Al Franken has popped back into the news tonight. Commentator Bill O'Reilly told "TIME" magazine that he now doesn't regret pushing Fox to sue Franken, which is interesting, because, right after the lawsuit failed, O'Reilly has denied pushing Fox to sue Franken and because the title of Franken's book is "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them."

O'Reilly went a little further, though, than merely doing a 180 on his responsibility for clogging America's courts with another frivolous suit. He said that Franken-quote-"is being run by some very powerful forces in this country and we need to confront it" and "President Andrew Jackson would have put a bullet between his eyes."

We'll skip for the moment the topic heading paranoia and the entire subject of just how Mr. O'Reilly knows what Andrew Jackson would have done and whether Andrew Jackson would have put a bullet through Mr. Franken's head or Mr. O'Reilly's.

Let's skip all that and talk instead about dissent. This has been a year in which dissent, especially taking an unpopular or minority political opinion, has been attacked by people like Mr. O'Reilly. In the last year, it has not been enough just to disagree with dissenters. Many of us have decided it is necessary to silence them, which is really kind of ironic, since it is political dissent that created this country and sustained it and improved it.

But ask the Dixie Chicks about how well, this year, we Americans kept our pledge to be tolerant of dissent, our delight in disagreeing with your opinion, but being willing to fight to the death to protect your right to express it. Or ask the Janeane Garofalos of this world, who are being told to shut up because their political opinions have no merit because they're merely on television, told to shut up by people who express their own political opinions merely to try to get ratings on television.

Or the Al Frankens, who wind up getting sued by the Bill O'Reilly's of this world. And when the suit gets literally laughed out of court, the Bill O'Reilly's of this world decide Al Franken is the tip of some conspiracy to get them and, in some other era, would have been shot through the head by the president. Earth to Bill. Come on home. Your porridge is getting cold.

I've done this long preamble to the No. 1 story as a way of letting recent history remind us of not-so-recent history; 2003 was not the first time dissent, the American virtue, the unique right of us Americans, suddenly became an ugly word. It happens every few decades, like when they passed the Alien and Sedition Acts around 1800s. Hell, in a way, the Civil War was about stifling dissent. The law said slavery was just fine. The people who changed that were dissenters.

And you have your Palmer raids in the '20s and your communist blacklist in the '40s and '50s, and there's the tip of tonight's No. 1 story.

All the witch-hunts against political contrarians in our history have ended the same way. The American political system was strong enough to prevail against mistaken ideologies. When the dissenters were wrong, the country got stronger. When the dissenters were right, the country got stronger. And everybody who ever tried to shut the dissenters up wound up hated and reviled, their accomplishments overshadowed by their lack of faith in freedom of speech, the people who arrested them, trashed them, sued them, testified against them.

There's the No. 1 story. We should be talking about the accomplishments of a 94-year-old moviemaker of "Streetcar Named Desire" and "A Tree Grows in Brooklyn." Instead, when we talk about the death of Elia Kazan, overshadowing his work was the time he unreluctantly and unremorsefully identified eight of his personal friends as communists during his testimony before the House Un-American Activities Committee.

<snip>
more: http://www.msnbc.com/news/973847.asp?cp1=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I saw that ...
Edited on Mon Oct-06-03 03:47 PM by Drifter
and nearly fall out the chair.

"Earth to Bill. Come on home. Your porridge is getting cold" - priceless

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Brilliant! Honest! True!
All praise to Mr. Olberman, the only good or even decent host on MSNBC, which has otherwise become a wingnut torture-chamber of Hell.

Will he get fired for this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayleybeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I wrote last week and thanked him
If anyone else wants to write here are the email addresses:

write Keith at
countdown@msnbc.com

write MSNBC at
viewerservices@msnbc.com

Show your support for this show! KO has been the lone voice for us at MSNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edzontar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I wrote to him.
I hope he survives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayleybeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thanks
I hope so too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-03 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Booyah!
Olbermann lays it out so plainly and so elequently that I really envy the shear brillance of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC