|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
maxrandb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:40 PM Original message |
Stupid Supreme Court Justice Question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. Answer - stuck till death or retirement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Actually, Supreme Court Justices can be impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I didn't know that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Misconduct or Conduct Unbecoming... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Spot on. If going fishing with the VP BEFORE the ruling on the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DelawareValleyDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. various reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Shoot, overlooked "impeach" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. Naw. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:54 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I hear you loud and clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 01:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
26. See, I was so hoping someone would post about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Montauk6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. Til death do us part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. If that is the case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
7. Chief Justice has only 1 vote, same as any other justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:46 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. What does all that mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:49 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. What is "all that"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:48 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. I believe that the CJ can also assign who writes the opinion (or.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. yes, but anyone can write a concurring or dissenting opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. I agree most of the times....but having read "The Brethren".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I do not think we are disagreeing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 01:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I agree that we are not disagreeing :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 01:04 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. LOL, well, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 01:06 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Dang, I wish I was a lawyer.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:53 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Well, if Scalia had recused himself as he should have in the 2000 election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:56 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. if Scalia recused it would have been a 4-4 vote with Fla court upheld |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 01:24 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. Perhaps in the cases of appeals..., but isn't there some tiebreaking power |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxrandb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 01:08 PM Response to Reply #7 |
25. Doesn't the Chief Justice set the agenda? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 01:17 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. No, Chief Justice does not decide what cases they hear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxrandb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 01:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. OK and Thanks for the answers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 01:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
28. He would also preside over an impeachment trial in the Senate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-13-05 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
13. I guess one question I would have that is related to this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:28 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC