Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Am I being snowed by Roberts?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 10:58 AM
Original message
Am I being snowed by Roberts?
I gotta tell you, I think I'm seeing a Souter here. Especially Grassley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm feeling the same way.
I really like what he's saying, to the extent that I'm inclined to support him. He seems to be a philosopher, in that he's able to step outside of personal morality and work in that vacuum with the rules that have been set.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I think he's able to step outside personal morality
because he has none. My radar says, "well-educated and presentable sociopath." I do not want to be at this man's mercy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Slick John
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 11:09 AM by notsodumbhillbilly
He's not presenting his views, he's giving answers that will meet the approval of the questioner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Exactly...
...he's been coached in how to respond. What are they going to do once he's confirmed and his rulings differ markedly from what's been presented? Jack shit is what they'll do.

NO Bush appointee is to be trusted, not a damned ONE. Bush is a shitty judge of character, and ESPECIALLY on a lifetime appointment, his appointees are NOT to be trusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've said it before, I'll probably say it again...
With as little experience on the bench as this guy has, I'll reserve judgement until I see some decisions on the bench -- after all, it's obvious now that we'll have plenty of time to watch the guy. He WILL be confirmed, and we will have the Roberts court for the next 20 or 30 YEARS.
That is a long freaking time -- several eons, in political time -- and no one can really say how he'll act or what he'll do, or even how he'll evolve, once he's on the SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. I'd feel a lot more comfortable
If the Bush administration would release his entire record for review by the committee and by the full Senate. It's pretty clear that there's no "national security" or "attorney/client" privileges to be invoked; Roberts' client when he was a U.S. Attorney was US!

No full disclosure, no vote. Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Roberts scares the shit out of me
and I do think he is a slick guy and we have no idea where his conscience really lies - our greatest barometer is the man who appointed him.

That being said, I don't know how useful some of the records when he was a US attorney are to finding his personal views. He was paid to produce the opinion of the United States government, not of John Roberts.

Damn, I wish I could watch the hearings. At work until midnight tonight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aintitfunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. He seems to be saying the right things
I am holding out hope, based on his near certain confirmation, that what he says he means. While I have no doubt he will fall on the conservative side, he speaks as though he has every intention to be fair to settle law and to honor the constitution. Time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. If you think he is anything but a hack you are!
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 11:04 AM by acmejack
Federalist society, corporatist, ethically conflicted (the stocks he holds), I fear he will be totally disastrous for us.

on edit: He has practiced for weeks, so he should be saying all the right things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. He's a beguiling Serpent with his words...But, look at his (((eyes)))
:eyes: He's got some verbal packaging...but they all lie. And the Senate has confirmed these liars over and over and over. He's a Federalists...like Ted Olson of the Florida recount and Roberts was involved in the Florida Recount.

Everyone Bush appoints was involved in the FLA Recount. There will be more election fraud until these people are exposed and halted from serving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MostlyLurks Donating Member (738 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Short answer: yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, to the tune of a Toro 2 stage
Beware of this guy, be vey aware...he the right's version of Earl Warren.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. don't eat the apple
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southsideirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. Freeps are liking him so that's a bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. He gives me a bad vibe.
He's way too white to be real. He's a Stepford nominee. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. Watch out! Roberts is a lawyer.
He is an expert at framing his arguments to assuage the fears of his opponents.

The trouble with Roberts is his attitude on federalism and the use of the Commerce Clause by the legislature to set policy on issues like minority and women's rights in the U.S. His views on the limits of federal authority to determine local and state policy will require local governments to face down multinational on issues like workers' rights and the environment as separate entities. We will be helpless against those international corporate pressures in the race to the bottom on issues such as racial and gender equality, wage and hour laws, the right to organize, air quality standards, clean water laws, and on and on. Individual communities will be on their own, competing with each other to set low standards and keep jobs in and attract businesses to their areas. As the economy becomes more global and less local, Roberts' federalist viewpoint will make the U.S. helpless and vulnerable. There will either be a backlash against his Court or he will have to wise up and realize that the 18th Century theories he embraces are obsolete and will weaken our country.

One thing I will give him credit for. He is smart, so maybe he will learn and change. We really can't defeat him. So, we are stuck with him no matter how bad he is, and he could be worse. We could have someone who is not as intelligent as he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Kicker Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. He's a Trojan horse.
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 11:21 AM by The Kicker
As soon as he is confirmed, the ass of the horse will open and.... the rest is history.

edit:spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. Correct, neo-cons have been wisely planning this PR deception for years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Kicker Donating Member (253 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. No doubt in my mind.
Anyone who thinks those in power are capable of putting forth a reasonable, non ideologue as a candidate for any position, IMO, are delusional. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. Yes you are being snowed -- He's slick
That's no reflection on you. But Republicans aregood at saying nothing while sounding like they're saying something. It's only later when the realization of the duplicity and emptiness sets in.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walkon Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. Anyone in, or being considered for,
high level positions in the Neocon world should be considered a liar. A Liar without remorse. On a mission where lying is the least of sins to be committed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
19. We don't know. There isn't enough information to know.
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 11:26 AM by MissMarple
He appears to be intelligent, but brittle and tightly wound. And he is saying the correct judge speak.

Good judges will put the responsibility for doing the right thing back on the legislatures, the president, the governors, ultimately on the people.

In the past few decades the legislatures and Congress have abdicated their responsibilities and pushed things into the courts that really do not belong there. It has made a mess of things, in general. Legislation from the bench from any direction is bad for our democracy. We saw that all too well when the Supreme Court made George president.

edit, spell check didn't work. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
20. That * nominated him is enough to send off
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 11:27 AM by Skidmore
alarm bells for me. I don't trust anything that comes out of this lying administration. There is some quid pro quo somewhere in this. These people don't do anything out of the goodness of their hearts or the best of intentions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
22. The fact that he feels
the Executive Branch should have more power...at this time makes him dangerous...(expecially when you put that together with his help getting the recount stopped and ** in) Add to that Gonzales doing the same with his reading of Geneva Convention and other stuff, where he said that the President had absolute power...well, you see where it's going......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoQuarter Donating Member (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
23. He is the Manchurian Candidate.
Groomed for this for YEARS. I don't trust him or his answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
24. I'm just not getting a comfortable feeling from this...
...it could be simply that * nominated Roberts, but it could be something else, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
25. Am I being pissed upon by Roberts?
Why yes, you are.

Fortunately Roberts is a Republican ideologue, and this will be his undoing. His ideology is not connected to any reality.

The seat Roberts is about to take will quickly become too hot for his tender little ass. You can't deal with issues like global warming, environmental destruction, economic collapse, energy shortages, racial inequities, and political uprisings by controlling the discussion.

Prayers and words did not stop Katrina. Some very nasty storms are headed Roberts' way...

In spite of Roberts' youth, I have some optimism he will be a short-timer. He may resign, or he may simply crawl into the safety of his closet and put his court on autopilot.

I can't see Roberts holding back the clock for the next twenty or thirty years. The happy white man fantasy castle he seeks to protect is crumbling into the sea, and good riddance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
28. Family man. Wholesome. Nice guy. Clean cut. Smiles a lot.
And he's goddamned right-wing Trojan Horse. :grr:

His demeanor and appearance appear benign enough, and he gives best-of-class, smart schoolboy answers. But the documented history of where he stands on the political spectrum betrays that whole calculated image.

This guy is far-right wing, and he will reward his masters with **decades** of loyal service.

Good God, talk about "legislating from the bench!" :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC