Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US media hails martial law general in New Orleans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 07:42 AM
Original message
US media hails martial law general in New Orleans
Well, since Bush as Churchill hasn't quite worked out, maybe Honore as Napoleon is the way to go. Anything to keep power in responsible, wealthy hands and away from the stinky masses.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/sep2005/hon-s13.shtml

The abject failure of American capitalist society in face of the human tragedy in New Orleans, and the disaster’s exposure of the stark social polarization in the US, have proven deeply unsettling for the ruling elite and the more comfortable sections of the upper middle class.

In search of reassurance, the media has latched onto an unlikely hero—the US Army general who is overseeing what amounts to martial law in New Orleans, directing thousands of heavily armed troops in this largely deserted American city littered with floating corpses.

The media is systematically promoting Lt. Gen. Russel Honore. He is portrayed as the antidote to the miserable incompetence and negligence exhibited by every level of government in the first four days following the hurricane, when the poor, the elderly, the sick and infant children were left literally to die in the streets without aid.

Honore was first hailed by New Orleans’ Democratic Mayor Ray Nagin as “one John Wayne dude,” a characterization that the television networks, followed by the print media, gleefully echoed. Now he is the subject of lengthy panegyrics in the press, extolled as the city’s savior. Among the sickest and most fawning of these tributes was a piece published Monday in the “Style” section of the Washington Post.

“There’s the swagger, and that ever-present stogie,” it reads. “There’s the height and heft of his physique. And that barking voice with its font of perhaps impolitic obscenities... not to mention his penchant for not suffering fools, as is the prerogative of a three-star general.”

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I believe Gen Honore is one of the good guys
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 07:50 AM by DoYouEverWonder
Bush had nothing to do with putting him and the National Guard in charge down there. Bush was trying to get Blanco to Federalize the response and if she had, New Orleans would look more like Fallujah and the Pentagon would still be running a military operation down there.

Honore and the LA National Guard took over the response. The General has the power to bring in forces from anywhere he pleases. As soon as he got to NO he told the troops already there, put down your guns and do something. From that point on the military operation was over and the Rescue/Relief effort was allowed to begin.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The article is more interested in the use the corporate media makes
of the military response to the disaster in NO. Instead of focusing on the looting of the government by the wealthy and the parallel efforts to make the government far less effective, it focuses on the military as the answer to chaos. Instead of acountability, we're encourged to seek simplistic, anti-democratic solutions.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/sep2005/hon-s13.shtml

The content of these articles is both ridiculous and ominous. It would seem that those who seek to shape public opinion in America are promoting the idea that the country’s immense problems—and its “hunger for a leader”—may be answered by the rise of a military man on horseback.

There is an objective basis and a profound political logic behind such conceptions. The “vulnerability to disasters” of which the AP speaks is the product of more than a quarter century of attacks on social programs in general, and civilian disaster relief capabilities in particular.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. IMHO this is by design.... the decline of America with a willing media
to hide the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Chris Matthews just brought up how everyone was happy
to see the military. "It's been a great performance." Only the criminals, he notes, might be unhappy. If only we could have the military everywhere all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC