Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why does Bush want to pay recovery workers less than prevailing wage?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:37 AM
Original message
Poll question: Why does Bush want to pay recovery workers less than prevailing wage?
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 09:49 AM by BlueJac
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. He just wants to pay less than prevailing wage, right?
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 09:42 AM by gollygee
which is still wrong.

I used to work at a construction company so I know what this is. Governmental projects have a prevailing wage for anyone who works on the project that is based on what union workers make so that union companies can compete with non-union companies when bidding the work. Otherwise, companies that pay non-union wages would get every governmental contract. Prevailing wage is much higer than minimum wage. It is a lot of money.

The issue is that Bush doesn't want union companies to be able to compete for these jobs, and that Bush doesn't want the people doing the work to make union-level salaries. Minimum wage isn't involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Haroldson Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. fool
He loves all Americans and wants to make sure more people can work, so the less the shrimp pays the more people work, right (NOOOOOTTTTTT!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Hi Haroldson!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Haroldson Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. fool
He loves all Americans and wants to make sure more people can work, so the less the shrimp pays the more people work, right (NOOOOOTTTTTT!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Because Bush is incapable of passing up any opportunity to enrich the
rich at the expense of the working class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. it is 'prevailing wages"--NOT 'minimal' wages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Because he's a cheap-ass bastard n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's a thinly disguiesd
Union-Bashing effort...

Davis-Bacon Wage determinations are usually based on regional wages paid by unions....this means they can hire people below that level and exclude unions shops from bidding on the jobs simply by making them uncompetetive.....companies employing people at minimum wage can bid lower by billing their labor at (say) 3-4 times minimum wage while union companies billing their labor just at cost are still going to be "high bidder" and out of the contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarojin Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. So they'll join the army instead n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southpaw Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Don't kid yourself that anyone from the area affected
Will be working on the project. Already five companies have been awarded contracts: Major contractors like Bechtel, CH2M, and Dewberry. These are all war profiteers currently involved in Iraq, and we know what a great job they've done there at restoring services. Only one of the companies is based anywhere near the Gulf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Now that you've edited the subject line
would you please also add this option:

Because he hates Unions.

Thanks :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. A ship of Mexican sailors was docking in Mississippi today
to help with the cleanup in Biloxi. The report I heard on one of the 'news' stations said 60 were expected to start today.

Probably as good a reason as any for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Come to think of it, if recent history repeats itself, as in Iraq,
there will be foreign workers coming in for those wages. Think of all of the workers that they brought into Iraq when so many Iraqis are unemployed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. Not Bush
Edited on Fri Sep-09-05 10:09 AM by marekjed
You don't seriously think Bush comes up with such shit, or knows a law on the books that lets him do what he did? This is a clear proof, if any more were needed, that Bush only does the bidding of his handlers. Cheney is the obvious guess, but could be anyone, could be someone we don't even know about or recognize the connection. But I'm certain * didn't come up with this all by his goofy self.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. So the contractors can make higher profits?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. .....and the contractors can make big big big donations to junior
and the party of pukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
17. To further damage the unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. Because that's the repub way of doing things.



If you get paid by the hour you're screwed right from the start.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatsFan2004 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. In our state, all government funded projects must pay workers
the prevailing wage (the union rate) whether the workers are unionized or not. That means that cities and towns pay higher wages for projects. There are obvious plus and minuses depending upon whether you are a worker or a home owner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. Need another choice: Another step in turning treasury over to his pals
And ponder this: Since Corporations have been getting all kinds of new, bigger tax breaks, and rich people get new, bigger tax breaks, the only serious payments going into the US Treasury are taxes paid by the working class. Now, lower the pay of those people = less $ going in to pay for the general upkeep of the nation. But the corporations get paid for their 'contract' work and get to stiff the workers, which also stiffs ALL OTHER TAXPAYERS who will have to keep making up the difference as payrolls go down further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-09-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. He hates allowing a good disaster go to waste
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC