|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:23 PM Original message |
We need just ONE person to bring down Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merwin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. Get each person to file a claim individually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. Class action suits for wrongful death and negligence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyranny_R_US (988 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Hey! Thats not nice to say about the first lady.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Not Civil.... Criminal!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. One thing at a time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
25. No, I want to see a pile-up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
3. Wouldn't Such A Suit Have To Include Blanco & Nagin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. They might. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wcross (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. There was a top to bottom failure of government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wcross (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I guess time will tell. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcctatas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:43 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. I'm only a student, but I believe you can choose who you want to include |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 10:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
44. I Guess "Have To" Is The Wrong Term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-05 05:58 AM Response to Reply #18 |
49. A plaintiff can choose his/her/their/its choice of defendant(s). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. If I were doing the suing, I would only sue Republicans, just for spite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 10:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
36. It wasn't Blanco or Nagin who REFUSED to allow water & food in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wcross (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
7. Is there a law that says the government must protect people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Yup. It is clearly the Feds responsibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wcross (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:40 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. I haven't had the opportunity to read it- have you a link? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:42 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. There was a nice thread about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:52 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. a very detailed and easy to follow explanation of Bush's responsibilities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wcross (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-05 07:45 AM Response to Reply #28 |
55. Thanks Generic other! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
14. No matter the result - the sausage making would be ugly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:43 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Allowing people to die is uglier. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 10:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
40. I meant the very public legal process of dragging W thru mud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jim3775 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
16. Fitzgerald is working on it. Give him time. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:44 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. He's been working on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jim3775 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:57 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Yeah, but we're what... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
21. Forget about it. Sovereign immunity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:49 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:51 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Jones didn't sue Clinton for any action he took or didn't take as pres. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 10:06 PM Response to Reply #26 |
38. Having looked up the Clinton v. Jones decision... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. Doesn't that apply to the gov't, NOT the individual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Sovereign immunity is not a blanket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 10:03 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. Can't get the individual any better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 10:21 PM Response to Reply #35 |
45. So, according to this, a police officer who watches a murder happening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-05 07:47 AM Response to Reply #45 |
56. Immune from private lawsuits. That's right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinfoilinfor2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
24. I'm sure there are attorneys on DU so I will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RPM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
27. it took three to bring down kennedy... would one really be enough? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mein Bush (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 11:04 PM Response to Reply #27 |
47. Actually it was three or four teams! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riverwalker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
31. yes yes yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seeking Serenity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
34. No good. President is immune from suit for official acts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 10:07 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seeking Serenity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 10:10 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Actually, thank my nominally Republican DH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 11:16 PM Response to Reply #34 |
48. Official "acts", perhaps...but what about official "INACTION"??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silverhair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
37. Nope. The POTUS can not be sued for actions taken as POTUS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 10:08 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Thanks. I have been corrected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kbm8795 (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 10:08 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. But..what about INACTION as POTUS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Silverhair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-07-05 10:45 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Legally - no difference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladylibertee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-05 06:01 AM Response to Original message |
50. Hmmmm.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Birthmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-05 06:24 AM Response to Reply #50 |
51. But it's a no go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJCRANE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-05 06:30 AM Response to Original message |
52. There needs to be a NO equivalent of Cindy Sheehan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-05 06:41 AM Response to Original message |
53. The Federal Government was sued over Waco... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-08-05 06:47 AM Response to Original message |
54. These poor people deserve to sue for megabucks and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC