Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans (Hastert) sneaky plan to kill bipartisan FCC rules rollback

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 01:57 AM
Original message
Republicans (Hastert) sneaky plan to kill bipartisan FCC rules rollback
Rollback may be nixed so Bush can avoid veto

If the White House and the big four nets get their way, congressional efforts to roll back the Federal Communications Commission's new media ownership rules will get lost in the end-of-the-year shuffle.

With President Bush's poll numbers slipping, Republicans leaders in the House and Senate are hoping they can jettison all efforts to repeal the FCC's looser rules allowing media companies to buy more stations -- and in doing so save the White House from having to make good on a veto threat.

The veto bill is now waiting for House action, but Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) is sitting on it with no plans to take it up and only about two months left in the session. If he refuses to bring up the bill, it will die on the vine. Meanwhile, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), chairman of the powerful Commerce committee, is trying to stall action on the FCC rollback by placing a hold on the spending bill containing the effort to restore the 35% cap.

With time running out in the legislative year, congressional sources say GOP leaders are planning to bundle all the remaining spending bills into a massive omnibus measure. If they do that, industry insiders believe House and Senate Republicans will strip the language restoring the 35% limit out of the bill in order to avoid any controversy and a politically damaging presidential veto.

http://www.variety.com/index.asp?layout=story&articleid=VR1117893382
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's still a veto. It's a veto without the actual veto.
Edited on Fri Oct-03-03 02:11 AM by w4rma
And it'll still be just as damaging if they do all this anti-democratic behind the scenes crap. In fact doing it this way taints the whole Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick for Alerting on Repuke Scoundrelism n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC