Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taliban Close In On Afghan Capital Of Kabul -- is this true?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 01:54 AM
Original message
Taliban Close In On Afghan Capital Of Kabul -- is this true?
http://www.jihadunspun.net/newsarchive/article_internal.php?article=77902&list=/newsarchive/index.php&offset=25&

Are there other reports corroborating this? Wouldn't the reemergence of the Taliban put the Bushits in a pickle barrel?

Taliban Close In On Afghan Capital Of Kabul
Sep 26, 2003
By Zafir Jamaal, JUS

Taliban Mujahideen have closed in on the suburbs of Kabul, the Afghan
capital, after taking the strategic town of Sarobi in an operation that
even Afghan officials consider ?amazing?. Taliban Mujahideen are now
amassing for a classic offensive from the south and east to take Kabul.


As Taliban Mujahideen closed in on Kabul, Taliban leaders urged
government forces to lay down their arms and surrender, saying that
President Burhanuddin Rabbani was 'preparing to flee'. Commander of the
Faithful Mullah Omar offered the government forces amnesty and told
them to stay at their posts to keep order.

The Taliban have proven once again their ability to make quick and easy
military as it did when it came to power in 1994. They have two thirds
of the country wrapped up are pushing north to try to surround Kabul
and take the government's air base at Bagram, 30 miles north of Kabul.
On Wednesday, Kabul police seized 47 rockets, each loaded with 91 small
bombs that were aimed at Kabul, fused and ready to be fired. ...

<snip>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes it would check on Asia Times
that is where many of these stories have first come out,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. The voting class only believes the bush regime, so it doesn't matter

what the actual realities are in either Iraq or Afghanistan.

The press in the region has been reporting advances by the Taliban for months now, but the American affluent classes believe only what the US corporate media and to an extent some UK press tells them.

More local, smaller papers in the region of Afghanistan and Pakistan do not have the same considerations regarding large corporate advertisers or maintaining cordial relationships with bush regime operatives, they tend to have fewer resources, and rely on reports from local reporters who are familiar with the area and are able to obtain access to activities independently of the bush regime or its affiliates.

As is the case with many issues involving the US, the US sees one picture, most of the world sees another, but what most of the world sees or thinks is not a matter of concern either to the bush regime or the voting elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. sounds implausible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. If it's any consolation, the Crusaders are killing lots of Afghans

The regime understands that although Afghanistan may not be forefront in the consciousness of most, the quiet satisfaction that Americans are slaughtering Muslims on more than one front is its greatest political asset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Under the circumstances
Edited on Fri Oct-03-03 02:56 AM by Scairp
This is no surprise. The many times that my husband and I have argued over the administration's rush to invade Iraq, I answered the question he put to me about what we should have done instead of invading when we did. My fervent believe is that we should have finished what we started in Afghanistan and then, if need be, deal with Iraq. Saddam, as we now know and as the Bush people knew all along, was more or less neutralized and there was no urgent need to go in there. Afghanistan on the other hand, still had terrorists running loose, not the least of which is bin Laden himself, and there was a huge risk of a Taliban resurgence. If it does happen, I fear we no longer have the troops available to go in there and put them down for the second time in two years. If the administration had any sense whatsoever, they would to the UN and made nice and get them to help us out in Iraq so that we are not overwhelmed with the war on terror. I can tell you one thing for certain, IF the Taliban makes a comeback that will be the end of the Bushies. I think we could get Bill Clinton reelected if such a think happened the country would so turn on Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HPLeft Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Exactly
This one will come back to haunt us. Only the Bush Administration would have chosen to divert its assets in an Iraqi adventure before stabilizing Afghanistan (or, for that matter, solving our problem with North Korea). Their arrogance is truly astounding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Color me skeptical
I never heard of Jihadunspun.

Also, in searching, the only fighting I see is in the hills on the Pakistani border where it looks like the Pakistani Army is trying to at least begin to assert itself in the tribal regions. I don't doubt that there are Taliban all over the country, and there always will be, but the idea of a mass attack into Kabul just doesn't look like it's close to happening. The Taliban can't mass any troops without getting scorched by our firepower.

Also, Rabbani is mentioned as the president planning to flee. He was the nominal head of the Northern Alliance who fled Kabul when the Taliban first took over in the mid-90's. He wanted to run for president after the Taliban were kicked out and I don't know if he has any post today. I searched and only got articles from 91 or earlier.

My guess is this is copied from a story from way back in 96 and cobbled together from that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. JihadUnspun has been around for a couple of yrs, now, lady in Canada

named Bev runs it.

They had a big fight with Azzam a while back over paying for some video. Azzam had the video, JUS wanted access, Azzam wanted $, JUS got mad, hilarity ensued.

The Jihad sites say it's a CIA front, the Crusader sites say it's a terrorist mouthpiece.

Almost all of their content are stories from other papers, some from the US, some from other places.

Sometimes they have translations of articles from papers that are not available online and/or in English.

Very occasionally they have an exclusive report from a local reporter in the region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. During operation OIL the had first reports
on US setbacks that were confirmed days later in the US corpowhore media.

That being said I would be surprised if this were true. I can't imagine the Taliban being able to withstand US air power long enough to sustain the kind of large operation required to take and hold any ground much less a populated area.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is this site credible
As I've never heard of it I would look elsewhere for confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkey see Monkey Do Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes & No
although there was a recent charge I read in a US newspaper that it was a CIA sponsored site in the vain of the cold-war "Congress for Cultural Freedom" propaganda outlets (& even the current "fake Mullah's" that Ron Kessler alleges the CIA has created)

Jihad-Unspun generally repeats stories from other sources -- a combination of al-Jazeera, Islam-online, the newswires & others although it does also write its own occassional article. So the "credible" stuff is from credible sources, the less credible is from questionable sources (duh!!)

As somebody has already said, "Asia Times" is by far the best concerning news from Afghanistan & Pakistan (who today test fired a nucular-capable ballistic missile?!?!?!).

**

As to this story, there has been several wire reports over the past 2 weeks of increased attacks around Kabul, as well several Western deaths (including a US soldier a few days back). And to harp on, I can't get over this extraordinary statement by Putin in his dual press conference with Bush on Saturday:

" I have never said this in public, I'm going to do it today. When counterterrorist operation began in Afghanistan, we were approached by people, through several channels, we were approached by people who intended to fight against Americans in Afghanistan. And if by that time President Bush and I had not formed appropriate relationship, as we have, so no one knows what turn would the developments in Afghanistan had taken."

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/09/20030927-2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-03-03 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Look for correlation, not necessarily confirmation
If the story is true, we'd expect

* recent reports of intense fighting in Sarobi
* some sort of open communication of distress by Rabbani or Karzai to the UN or USA

So far, I haven't seen that. I did see Karzai on C-Span last week discussing how things weren't going so well in Kabul. I'm looking through http://www.aopnews.com/ to see if they have anything, it ought to be in there, they do cover Taliban activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC