Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reasons why cruise ships and naval vessels are not on scene yet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:02 AM
Original message
Reasons why cruise ships and naval vessels are not on scene yet
I spoke with a client who is in USCG. I asked her if she was being sent to NO. She said of course, she's in 'aids to navigation' division, all the channel markers were wiped out and they'd be shipping out soon.

D'uh, then it hit me like a ton of bricks I should know from experience. The waterways after the storm are not safe at all for navigation. The are full of hazzards, flotsom and jetsom (I love those words), entire sandbars disappear, and new ones are made, the channel markers, which are very important for big ships to mark the deeper water are not there.

She had alot to say about her friends that were piloting choppers, but why waste it in a thread that will sink like a rock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
justabob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for pointing that out nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Boy, you wonder how the world was explored 500 years ago with all those
dangerous sandbars and unknown thingies in the water. I guess you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. If you knew anything about marine navigation you wouldn't be so flip
Under the best of conditions, transit to NO was a bear. Without channel navigation aids, any ship would be in danger of running aground.

Once aground, it would be a major evolution getting the channel cleared again. It is much better to get the markers back in place prior to attempting a transit.

As for your remark, you might consider the difference between a 70 foot long ship displacing 300 tons and a modern ship, a small example of which would displace at least 10 times as much and be 400 foot long. It would draw considerably more water too.

Just an old sailor's opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bingo! That's what I've been saying for a few posts.
BTW, this is why the Norfolk, Mayport FL and other naval bases along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts order the vessels out to sea in the event of a hurricane threat. Damage in their areas affect commercial shipping as well.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. You know what? I'm sick of excuses. I really am.
I can appreciate what you're saying.

However, I'm not sure I care.

This hurricane wasn't a surprise. There have been hurricanes before. This is 2005, not 1941.

They should find a way. These commanders, chiefs, etc. make a lot of money. George Bush makes 400,000 of our dollars yearly. Figure something out and stop giving people excuses. Fuck that. Figure something out.

Geez, they don't even have to bring a ship right into a NO port. Just close enough for helicopters to go in and out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Its not an excuse . Its common sense
Edited on Sat Sep-03-05 08:28 AM by fishnfla
something which seems to be in short supply in all phases of the situation.

the hurricane was not a surprise, its true they should've known. They have NO WAY of knowing what it did to the waterways besides this: navigation is extremely dangerous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. When we navigate waters in foreign countries, like during the war
I would bet they don't have markers. These ships could be in deep waters and send smaller boats for very shallow waters to pick up and drop off people, couldn't they? It just doesn't seem right.

Maybe if we had intelligent and articulate leaders explaining every avenue of consideration during their press conferences instead of just standing there congratulating each other on what a fine job they are doing, we would all have a better understanding (not just the people who have experience in the waterways).

Just a few thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The waterways are charted and marked even by GPS world wide
but the storm messes up the bottom, the storm surge pushes water and in shallow water it pushes sand. Ship gets stuck, it needs a rescue mission

and now that I think about it, with the currents, the bottom is unstable for awhile after a storm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. That may be so....
and again, I do understand your point. I'm just frustrated that we keep hearing all of these reasons people weren't being helped, and you know, it doesn't matter.

Maybe they couldn't have gotten the ships there (and I still don't understand why they're even bothering with the ships if the situation is as you say) but they could have done *something*. Which they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aunt Anti-bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Although it does make sense,
it doesn't make me feel any better. You know, if my neighbor was in her house and it was burning down, it'd be dangerous for me to try to save her, but damn if I wouldn't run right in and do what needed to be done. Our USCG is trained for such things, I would imagine, and at a time like this when everything is so critical, you'd think they would have been dispatched immediately and have already been in there, navigating through the dangerous spots so they could get in where they need to be to save lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC