Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sanders: American Workers Stiffed.... Should be Dem Issue.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:27 AM
Original message
Sanders: American Workers Stiffed.... Should be Dem Issue.
Edited on Tue Sep-30-03 11:31 AM by Armstead
From website of Cong. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)
http://bernie.house.gov/documents/releases/20030826183955.asp


For Immediate Release, 8/26/2003
Low Wage Jobs Stiffing American Workers


One in four working Americans now make less then $18,100 a year, which is the current official poverty level in the United States for a family of four. That is over 30 million working Americans who are still living in poverty. The wage gap is widening, leading to greater and greater income inequality among American families. Between 1973 and 1997, the average annual incomes of the poorest 20% of families actually fell by 5% ($701), while the average income of the richest 20% of families grew by 41% ($39,077). The incomes of the richest 5% of families grew fastest of all, increasing by 64% ($91,336).

That is simply not acceptable. To read an Op-Ed that debunks the myths about why people are working longer hours for lower wages click here.

http://bernie.house.gov/documents/articles/20030826182931.asp
-------------------------

Excerpt

Published on 8/24/2003 in the Alameda Times-Star
Four myths, 30 million potential votes
by Beth Shulman

As the Presidential campaigns seek definition, one pivotal issue remains hidden from view. It is potentially huge, especially for Democrats, because it involves their natural constituents, and it addresses core issues of the economy, social justice and fairness. The issue is low-wage work. Fully 30 million Americans -- one in four U.S. workers -- earn $8.70 an hour or less, a rate that works out to $18,100 a year, which is the current official poverty level in the United States for a family of four. These low-wage jobs usually lack health care, child care, pensions and vacation benefits. Their working conditions are often grueling, dangerous, even humiliating.

At the same time, more and more middle-class jobs are taking on many of these same characteristics, losing the security and benefits once taken for granted. The shameful reality of low-wage work in America should be on every Democrat's cue card as a potential weapon to be used against the Republicans' rosy economic scenario. But so far it isn't. Why not? One reason may be four long-standing myths that have for years drowned out a rational discussion of what should be a national call to conscience:

EDIT

At the same time, the purchasing power of the federal minimum wage fell 30 percent during the 1980s. Despite minimal increases in the 1990s, according to the Economic Policy Institute, the value of the current minimum wage of $5.15 per hour is still 21 percent less than it was in 1979.

The richest country in the world should not tolerate such treatment of more than a fourth of its workers. The myths of upward mobility and inevitable market forces blind too many people to the grim reality of low-wage work. A presidential campaign is the right time to begin a conversation on how to change it.

Beth Shulman is a lawyer and author of "The Betrayal of Work: How Low-Wage Jobs Fail 30 Million Americans," to be published next month by the New Press.

MORE


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Should be Dem issue... and more Dems should be like Sanders!
Of course, we're both of the same mind on this, right Armstead? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Trouble is that even though Sanders votes with the
Dems he is an Independent and refers to himself as a socialist. Ooh there is that dirty word!

Beth Shulman's book The Betrayal of Work is excellent and if I had an unlimited amount of money (i.e. a trust fund) I would buy one for every Dem rep and Senator and ask them to report back to me after they had read it.

All left leaning people should read what it is really like to work as a CNA or other care giver. Not easy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You confirmed my premise, ikojo
Trouble is that even though Sanders votes with the Dems he is an Independent and refers to himself as a socialist.

And if, in many instances, the Democratic Party was actually fighting to win for themselves AND the working class, rather than seeking to curry favor, then there wouldn't be a NEED for Bernie Sanders to be an independent.

IOW, he embodies the common sense and fighting spirit that the Democratic Party SHOULD represent -- but they have fallen far from that mountain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Low wage workers are irrelevant to the interests of the voting classes

As American workers make the transition to surviving on a globally competitive wage, the voting class will decrease further.

There is no need for any candidate to spend resources on low wage or minority voters. This demographic has been effectively marginalized to the point of virtual disenfranchisement.

No electable candidate has anything to offer this segment of the population, and they are less susceptible to empty rhetoric than the affluent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You are right in theory
Edited on Tue Sep-30-03 11:44 AM by Armstead
Except the GOP has learned language to talk to the working class, and is stealing their loyalty, even thogh their policies are the opposite of what will benefit working people.

The Democrats need to learn a language that both addresses workers concerns and tells the truth. That would reverse that trend.

But I agree, too few seem interested in doing that. (Except for Kucinich, Sharpton and to an extent Dean and Gephardt and Mosley Braun. Edwards talks the talk, but he is still too oriented to the Corporate Centrist position IMO)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. "pivotal issue remains hidden from view"
that says a lot about a lot of things

How much does it take for a family of 4 earning $18,100 or less (whatever of that is 'net') to provide housing, food, clothing, etc., a year?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It is too hidden
>>>>How much does it take for a family of 4 earning $18,100 or less (whatever of that is 'net') to provide housing, food, clothing, etc., a year?<<<

probably about a year-and-a-half to two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Avg apartment costs almost 4 times the minimum wage

The free market price of a day's labor has fallen well below the free market price of a day's survival.

This is not a situation that is in the best interests either of politicians or the affluent.

The prognosis for a political resolution is poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. The Housing Wage site.
http://www.nlihc.org/oor_current/

All the ammo you could need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Affordable Housing
Anotehr issue that ought to be on the front burner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. Americans need to interpret what Shrub says
Just take a look at all the pretty logos/themlines and the opposite is always true.
"MORE JOBS" means less jobs
"CLEAR SKIES" means dirtier skies
"LEAVE NO CHILD BEHIND" means those who can afford a good education
"MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" means mission just begun
and it goes on and on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. It IS a Dem issue-- although some Dems need to be reminded of it!
Especially the DLC and other corporate apologists who seem to forget where our power base is at.

This is precisely the reason I stopped working for Democratic presidential candidates in 1992-- the party simply dismissed the concerns of working people in order to pander to the highest corporate bidder. Even the unions stopped doing this for a while, and worried about their 'old line' constituents in the smokestack industries, while service workers damn near BEGGED for unionizing help.

THE TRUE DEMOCRATS stand up for the working people of this country, and WILL NOT sell them down the river to appear "moderate" or to get bigger campaign contributions. These issues are our bread and butter, and we've consistently been able to use them against our Republican opponents.

It's a dirty shame that espousing such a position these days in the Democratic Party will get you branded as a "wacko" or "extremist" or "troublemaker". It just goes to show how far to the right the political discussion in this country has drifted. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. THE TRUE DEMOCRATS are actually the moderates
The once who ignore these issues and instead advocate policies that sell out average people to the rich and corps are the radicals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. What is Bernie doing wasting time on issues like these, when he could
be bashing Clark or Dean? I mean, this guy needs to get his priorities straight!!

(Heh heh heh...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Is he funnier looking than Kucinich?
They're both "far left whackos" so just want to know which is farther out man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I dunno, bro. They both look pretty weird to me!
I figger when they meet at that there commie-infested "Progressive Caucus," that Bernie enters the room wearin' his Birkenstocks, & he shoves a bowl of granola over to Dennis. Then Dennis says, like, Man, do ya know where I can score a lid? Then they get stoned & transact the nation's business. That's how I think it goes down.

Two stee-range little dudes, iz all I can say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. If Bernie came out for poor mistreated millionaires and corps
And voted to get rid of the Death Tax, he'd be okay in my book.

Or stop those damn poor people from ripping off the system through Bankruptcy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. I really like Bernie Sanders
I hear he just may endorse Kucinich. I wouldnt be suprised honestly, Bernie is a member of the progressive cancus as well. I like both of those guys, Kucinich and Sanders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. He and Dennis K are ideological brothers
They also both "get it" in terms of what is needed to make the Democrats and liberal politics relevant again.

Only problem with them is that there's not more of 'em in control of the "message."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. yep
Bernie :) is my favorite Vermont politican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Kucinich has really stood up for service workers, like janitors, some of
whom are not even citizens. He consistently favors the little guy over the fat cats. His latest: cancelling a million $ fund-raiser at the Hyatt in Orange county, CA because the "service workers" were having a labor dispute with them.

He is against privatization and out-sourcing of government jobs into low-wage contract-out-to-the-lowest-bidder jobs. AFSCME(the ones in the green shirts) stood up and cheered for him when he said everyone should have collective bargaining, at the Albuquerque Presidential debate!!

He believes that as soon as an election is held that votes in a union, it should be in place and the business should have to do collective bargaining with the union.(Currently the wait is about 2-3 years before the union vote counts.)

I couldn't imagine a man who agrees more with Sanders. This IS a Dem issue, but not for "some" candidates, who go merrily on their $2000 per person fund-raisers...:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yep. It's too bad they're seen as outsiders
They should be considered the mainstream of liberal Democratic politics, and their positions ought to be the official platform (and less of the "opportunity through growth" centrist pablum.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. An evening...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC