and say our troops had to die for a tin horn dictator who was never a menace to us. Innocent Iraqis were also slaughtered without a second thought by this administration. Evil is where you see it.
3. Is the world better off without all the butchered Iraqi women and children
too? Is the world better off without our 1700+ war dead?
I get called a "Saddam lover" if I point out that the US invasion probably killed off more Iraqis than Saddam would have had we left him in power. Not only that, the war has destroyed the infrastructure of cities, left depleted uranium all over the place. This war will still be killing Iraqis hundreds of years from now--if there are any Iraqis left.
It's about lying to the American people. We were never given accurate facts by the president to make that judgement. Even his risk analysis was was off.
The people of Basra (insert another Iraqi city here) will welcom us as liberators? THere's no fucking way in hell Bush and Rummy Dumby were telling the truth on that one. They had to know it was a lie when they said it.
I give this talking point the same amount of time I give the "Fly paper theory".
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.