Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When will we see the Saturday Night Massacre?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:13 PM
Original message
When will we see the Saturday Night Massacre?
It looks as if someone is going to bite the big one in Plamegate -- likely Rove and probably Libby.

The Republican Hate Machine has tried to stop this by piling lies on top of more lies, but it hasn't slowed the wheels of justice.

It looks like the only way to halt indictments is going to be a Watergate-style Saturday Night Massacre like the one Nixon pulled on Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox.

Does anyone think that Bush wouldn't at least consider firing Fitzgerald?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. An option...
Found dead of "suicide"... documents missing, blah blah blah...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please, Please, Please, Please.....
I hope he does something stupid like that.
The more outrageous their actions or inactions...the better for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. They'd have to concoct a real whopper of a lie
to fire Fitzgerald. They'd find someone who would swear he heard Fitzgerald in a restaurant talking about how he was out to get Rove or some such shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arbustosux Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Lawyers For Truth!!
they have to be forming that group as we speak!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I think so too
If they do fire him it would show a bad sign to the public. Especially since he was appointed by Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope Fitzgerald stays off of small planes
and hires good bodyguards because given the history of the BFEE, he's more likely to be offed via a suspicious accident or "suicide" than he is to be fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. He has dealt with the mafia before
and survived. I remember reading another post that had some information on Fitzgerald and he had to stop getting mail at his house because he was being threatned with bombs. He's also dealt with the GOP before in Illinois so I think he'll be able to handle these folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hee Hee
Saturday night massacre always makes me think of Arlo Guthrie and Alices Restaraunt. But getting rid of Fitzgerald is a scary thought, and I don't think even the bushies are bold enough to do something so blatantly self-serving...of corse I didn't think chimpy would fly back to sign the Schiavo bill either.:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unrepuke Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bush is not the architect - whatever happens
will be by Rove's plan.

IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think they will do that. It didn't work with NIxon.
If it had worked, I'd say, sure they'll try it, but it didn't.

I've met several US Attorney's during business investigations. I found each of them to be nasty, arrogant, very serious, and out for blood! I doubt, even if Shrub fired Fitz, he'd be in any better position that he is now, and probably worse!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. word was he couldn't be fired
Though I forgot the justification, it had something to do with the GAO or similar.

Anyway, I really hope beyond all hope they don't succeed in assassinating Fitzgerald. I really hope he's got bodyguards and is doing something to keep them from bombing him like John O'Neill. I'm truly afraid that there is no hope left for democracy if they assassinate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Did you see this thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. There's no question that if...
... Bush wanted him fired, Gonzales would do it for him.

However, they're the most publicity-conscious administration in history (which is how Rove ended up in the mess he's in, trying to launch a counter-attack to bad publicity). I think they all know what an incredibly bad move that would be.

My guess is that they're now trying to get Gonzales to insert complicating or mitigating items into the investigation, to tie up the grand jury and Fitzgerald until the grand jury expires, because that's a win for them they can publicize, i.e., "the grand jury spent eighteen months examining the evidence without issuing any indictments." I think they're hard at work on something like that.

Their best option right now is to use the DoJ to help them run out the clock.

Of course, when you start hearing leaks like, "indictments are imminent," all bets are off--at that point, they may get desperate.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWolper Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. We won't see it
I think that Bush is looking at his legacy now. It was a disaster for Nixon and Bush knows this. If anything, he will fire Rove, Libby and others and "restore" America's faith in honest government and (of course) George W. Bush. What comes of Fitzgerald's Grand Jury then is old news, unless of course, Bush himself were implicated. I could be all wrong, but at any rate, it will be interesting. As an old man I urge the younger members here to remember that history is not a 'was' it is an 'is'. We are living it right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Bush cannot fire Rove
Rove knows too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
13. It would put the Republicans running in 2006 in an interesting position
And the Democrats running against them would have a great issue to run on if their opponents DIDN'T condemn the removal of Fitzgerald. But depending on what Bush's moles on Fitzgerald's legal team are telling him, he may have no choice, especially if this leads right to Cheney's door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
17. Honestly, I think they missed their chance.
I'm surprised they didn't pull something like that soon after getting that ass-kisser Gonzalez into the Attourney General's seat. They could've pulled the plug on the investigation and the corporate media would've been able to look the other way.

Too late now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algomas Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
18. I think negotiations are under way right now...
as to the opulence of Karl's golden parachute. And of course there will a back chanel available to him to continue the working of Bu$h's strings.

Too bad for Smirk! His due date has arrived and he will go down. If I were him, I would stay away from all aircraft, Sneer may order Plan B on his sorry ass.
After all, he has been expendable all along. Talking like a hick and looking good in a cowboy hat is his sole purpose. I don't think that persona will cut in anymore and if it looks like disaster for them, they are capable of anything, such as a phony regicide to trigger martial law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
19. Can't fire Fitzgerald....he has special legal powers that place him....
...outside Herr Busch's chain-of-command. In fact, his powers are almost identical to the powers of the now-defunct "Independent Counsel".

Special Counsel and Permanent Indefinite Appropriation, B-302582, September 30, 2004
<http://www.gao.gov/decisions/appro/302582.htm>

QUOTE:

"For the reasons discussed below, we do not object to the use of the permanent indefinite appropriation to fund Special Counsel Fitzgerald's expenses. Unlike the expired independent counsel law, the permanent indefinite appropriation does not require that a Special Counsel be appointed from outside the government. The Department, in appointing Special Counsel Fitzgerald under "other law", has afforded him independence by delegating all of the Attorney General's authority with respect to the investigation and instructing him to exercise that authority independent of the control of any officer of the Department. Finally, the Part 600 regulations are not substantive and may be waived by the Department."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC