Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I will never support Hillary for the nomination in 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:03 PM
Original message
I will never support Hillary for the nomination in 2008
No way I ever will someone who does crap like this: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/14/hillary_clinton_gta/

Her and Lieberman need to shut up about this and let the conservatives whine about this crap, there are way more important things to be concerned about. The young demographic would be way more receptive to the Democrats if they left our movies, music and video games alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, I just posted on this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here is what bothers me about it
It seems like the appropriate outlet for the "little lady" to address values. Leave the big hardball issues to the boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakfs Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. More "wisdom" from Democratic leaders
Hillary and Leiberdisappointment (one of my senators, sad to say) are both trying to address the Democrats' failure to win red-state votes. THAT'S what this is about. They are going about the wrong way in my opinion. It all sounds like more political bs.

Hillary will try to do what Bubba did - appear as a progressive moderate, strong on defense, strong in the war on terra, strong in the culture wars.

THAT said, I would not be surprised to see Hillary (in some miraculous twist of fate) win the White House in '08 and return to her true colors - a flaming feminist liberal, which is fine with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Oh, look there is that myth again:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malingerer Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. I totally agree...
Our government needs to focus on important issues like poverty in our country, foreign wars, and other IMPORTANT issues. Rather than pointless feel good legislation 'for the children'. Hillary doesn't have the capability to lead a nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. This is hardly the only issue she's focusing on
She can chew gum and walk at the same time. A few days ago, she supported Kerry's call for Bush to fire Rove. Obviously, IF she ever runs for president, her agenda will deal with big issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Oh, she "supported Kerry's call", did she?
What a good girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is how she is gonna win...
It's the same thing as Bill criticizing Sister Soulja, or Tipper advocating labeling of records. Who cares if she criticizes these people? She isn't advocting censorship, just saying there is material on there that is not advertised, and wasn't contained in the warning. Probably would have gotten an AO instead of M rating had it been known. So she gets to criticize "pornographers," isn't advocating censorship, and burnishes her moderate credentials without really taking any action other than tongue lashing them. Seems like good politics to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. This and the record labeling is nothing like Sister Soulja
Sister Soulja made a very stupid and racist comment. By attacking it Bill was able to distance himself from the "looney left" without turning off very many people, if anyone.

On the other hand, this crap and the record labeling turns off everyone who likes these games and that music.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Didn't keep Bill and AL from getting elected did it?
How much did Tipper's record labeling campaign hurt her or Als standing...not at all.

This will get Hillary more votes than it loses her...

Course the whole thing is on the margin and will be forgotten in a week or two, but I suspect there will be more of these things. Appearing sympathetic to moderate views on these cultural issues without abandoning core principles, which will slowly change people's views of her as a liberal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. But Tipper wasn't the candidate
I really have to disagree this will gain more votes than lose them. The only people that really dig this crap are die hard fundie types who will never vote for any Democrat, much less Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Untrue...
Edited on Fri Jul-15-05 01:29 PM by SaveElmer
This is gonna appeal to all the middle class moderate soccer moms who have to work, and find it hard to regulate what their kids are exposed to. The fact is, the game did not contain a warning about the sexual content which should have been disclosed.

The fundies would want the whole thing banned...not Hillary's position at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. I agree :-)
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. But she went off half cocked without all the info.
To get to that 'content' you had to download a MOD for the game that enabled some hooks already in the game and gave them nude skins for characters. Also, why would anyone complain about sex in a game that has thousands of dead bodies around that died violently. I am not advocating anything about censoring the violence here, just saying that is not the priorities I would vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Still should have been disclosed, or removed from the code...
It was obviously accessible...

Also, she is concerned with the violence...her statement in part:

“I am announcing these measures today because I believe that the ability of our children to access pornographic and outrageously violent material on video games rated for adults is spiraling out of control.”


You are missing the larger point however, while it is very likely she is bothered by this content, the larger point is to position herself for the election.

Good politics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Such a lady-like concern for the violence
while the real world bodies stack up.

Yeah, she is really grappling with the big issues of the hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Did you vote for Kerry?
Just askin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Yes
Don't remind me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justinsb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. I agree
The dems need to look to people with something new to say, progressive Dems from the black caucus, and people like Kucinich, Dean and Obama. Provide an alternative and stop being 'republican lite' otherwise nothing will be accomplished by putting them in power even if they do win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. If she is really that concerned with our children...
tell her to advocate increased funding for public schools, and the hiring of more teachers to prevent over-crowded classrooms. My mother would appreciate the help, and so would her pupils.

Until then Hillary, Shut the F**k up about problems with video games, no one cares except for Dobson and his Family Values cronies, and guess what, they're not on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sometimes, politicians engage in "weathervaning"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evirus Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. the thing is
people made the GTA modification which enabled the sexual content, rockstar desided to cancel the minigame and simply disable it through code instead of removing the code compleatly from the game. but the real thing is THE GAME IS ALREADY RATED M WHICH HAS AN AGE RANGE OF ABOVE 17
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southsideirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. Never in a million years would I vote for that quasi-republicreep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. She lost me on drug warrior n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'm with you there.
Hillary would not get my support either. There are things I admire about her, but she is too 'bought' and political for our country's needs. No more DLC, No more Skull and Bones, No more Corporate puppets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. Proves she knows how to play the game...
This is how Republicans win...Bill Clinton is the only Democrat who has been able to beat them at their own game...Hillary is now utilizing the same strategy that got us our one and only Democratic President in the last 25 years.

She is not for censorship! She is playing the political game that has proven successfull for Republicans for 5 of the last 7 elections.

I'm bettin it will work!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. True, it has been proven successful for Republicans...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. There are more important issues to me than video games.
Not a make or break issue either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. That's the point...
Edited on Fri Jul-15-05 01:42 PM by SaveElmer
It's about positioning herself for the election. She wants to moderate her image. She isn't advocating any specific policy other than increasing fines on manufacturers that don't follow the ratings guidelines, just mainly tongue lashing the game makers for not disclosing this content.

It's this kind of political posturing that worked for Bill and that the Repukes are expert at. I for one am glad we have someone who can beat them at their own game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I agree. I can't fathom vowing to oppose someone over a trivial
issue like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Especially when all those big issues go unaddressed
or addressed according to the Republican worldview. After all, it HAS been so successful for the Republicans. Would you listen to yourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #29
64. They are not unaddressed...they just aren't to your liking..
Here is Hillary's position on the war...from a couple months ago...

Now this may not be your view...but to say this is the current Republican view is ridiculous!!!

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/21/iraq.hillary/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
28. Not for nomination or election.
I'm not all that churned up by the vidio games flap, but her vote for the war, her "embracing pro-lifers", her statement about the "failed insurgency", her calling for more troops, her support of the occupation, and all the other right wing crap she extols.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. She hasn't "embraced" pro-lifers...
She has not changed her position on choice, she simply is choosing to emphasize the areas where there may be commonality. There are very few who are pro-choice who believe abortions are a good thing. At the very least they are traumatic for the woman. It benefits everyone to prevent them if possible. There are plenty of anti-choice people who are more concerned about reducing abortions than in scoring political points (ala Randall Terry). Advocating contraception, counseling and other methods, without trampling on a womans rights to get an abortion if they need one is a place where both sides can work together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. She is spinning it
with a moral underpinning which actually serves to weaken womens'rights by casting it as "tragic" or other loaded language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. That's not spin...it's the truth
I have friends who have undergone the procedure and found it to be a wrenching experience. Of course everyone is different, and for some it may not be, but to say that having an abortion is a "good" thing is ridiculous. Sometimes it is a necessary thing.

To suggest she is trying to weaken women's rights is ridiculous on the face. SHe has been a lifelong advocate of a woman's right to choose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. as an escort at an abortion clinic
I can tell you, from vast experience, that most women are relieved.

Sorry to shatter your illusions, but it is not a tragedy for the women who undergo the medical procedure- only for those who would impose the judgement on the women's decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Of course they are relieved....
And I too have taken many for the procedure. They are relieved that they have the right to get it, and that they can end the pregnancy. But I have not run across one who would say it is a good experience they would wish to repeat.

I agree that the last thing a woman going for an abortion needs is to be judged by others. Hillary did not do that. Her concern is for women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Neither is going to the dentist.
I wouldn't frame it as "tragic". Now a woman forced to bear and then be condemned as the bringer of all the world's ills as the evil welfare mother--now that is tragic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. You are right...
No woman should be forced to carry a child to term that they do not want. That certainly is not Hillary's position. But, all women do not view abortion the same way. Most are relieved, some feel enormous guilt, but none view it as good (at least those that I know).

Are you saying that reducing the number of abortions through education and birth control is a bad thing?

And really, to compare an abortion, which after all is an invasive surgical procedure (all the more to make sure it is legal and available) to going to the dentist is a little ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. Are you a woman? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Nope...
Do I need to be to have an opinion on the topic?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. So, where's the "common ground"? And, what about the other issues?
I don't see all that many pro-preggers who advocate contraception, sex-education, or allowing abortion on demand.

She's playing politics on all these issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Not the ones in front of the camera...
But I would daresay that most anti-choice people are not against contraception efforts, in fact I know many. It is lamentable that the extremists get the TV time, but that is the way our modern media works.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. And, the other issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #47
58. No, many anti-abortion people are actually anti-sex before marriage.
They think all these women are just fooling around, partying, and they shouldn't be doing that. The pregnancy would be (in thier mind) gods wakeup call. The ability to get an abortion is an easy way out and allows them to continue partying. Some do also believe that the 1 day old fetus is a life (by the same token that god put it there as a wake up call). Contraception is also defeating the purpose to them. It allows the sex and partying to continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
31. I swore when she voted for the war (I'm a NYer) that I would Never vote
for her again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. That's Real Smart
then we can have total corporate Repub control? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Did you vote for Kerry?...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. What is this?
A test?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. I just find it interesting...
That those that rail against Hillary for her vote on the war, nevertheless managed to vote for Kerry who did the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. ABB, pal
Not like there was much choice. And he was a lousy candidate that ran a pitiful campaign against the worst, most criminal administration in these times. And he lost (or for those who insist, he won by a hair when it should've been a landslide).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. So are you saying you would vote for Hillary if she were nominated?
And I agree that he ran a lousy campaign, but it wasn't his war vote that cost him the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. No
Pretty much stretched to the limit by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Well I'm sure Ralph Nader will be running again!!!
Have at it...it is a Democracy after all!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
62. Yes, I did and that is only because he did publically regret voting
for authorization, whereas, Hillary still hasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Well that is a better reason to oppose her than this video game thing...
However the difference in hers and Kerry's positions now is not great. She won't say she regretted the vote, but neither she nor Kerry has advocated withdrawl, and both routinely lambast Bush for the conduct of the war.

Here are her comments on the situation...this is probably where mnost of the country is...and where she needs to be on this issue if she is going to run for Prez (which I hope she does)

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/21/iraq.hillary/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. No, there weren't too much of a difference. I had supported Dean in
the beginning and really wished when pulling the lever, that I was voting for him and not Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. Right you are. And, she still supports it.
So did one of my senators (Cantwell) and she can sing for my (and, my wife's) vote in '06.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. Hillary lost me when she refused to support Barbara Boxer
When it was time to call the question on the Ohio voting machines, Barbara stepped up to the plate, but Hillary backed away. Not very smart - now Boxer is practically treated as a folk hero by the grass-roots gang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
37. Agreed, there are other "moral values" issues
I think pollsters just don't get the difference between what people say and what they do. There is certainly a cultural problem with violence and alot of people find some of these video games disgusting, but that's not the same as supporting censorship. If they want a moral values issue, how about helping unwed fathers become involved parents or change the child molestation and sexual offender laws so they work better. Things that the vast majority of people actually care about. This is the biggest problem with the Dem leadership, their 'hot button issues' alienate more people than they bring in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
42. You'll refuse to support her because of THIS?!
Jeez Louise, I can think of about a dozen reasons not to support her, but THIS?!

This is just one of those DU posts that I should ignore. When will I learn...

:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Can't speak of OP, but I decided long before this.
Edited on Fri Jul-15-05 02:15 PM by dbonds
I would much rather have a Barbra Boxer, or someone I thought had the best interest of people and not business in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
49. As long as you support the Dem candidate for president,
it's all good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #49
59. That depends on the candidate. Doesn't it?
Seeing as how Hillary and Kerry seem to be about the only ones being mentioned...I'll be voting Green if either get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC