Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Great analys of Bush* approval #'s by Josh Marshall

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
fizzana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 12:27 PM
Original message
Great analys of Bush* approval #'s by Josh Marshall
In fact, I'm pretty sure the last two presidents who won second terms (Reagan in 1983 and Clinton in 1995) were doing worse a year out. But the key here is that the president's numbers seem to be in something close to free-fall. His approval ratings have fallen roughly 20 percentage points in four months. And both Reagan and Clinton were on the rebound at the time.

<snip>

The problem is more fundamental. For quite some time this White House has functioned like a heavily leveraged business, an overextended investor that suddenly gets a margin call. To extend the business metaphor, the White House has been surviving not on profits but expectations of future profits or, in other words, credibility. The White House has been able to get the public to sit tight with a lot of objectively poor news (a poor economy, big deficits, bad news from abroad) on the basis of trust.

<snip>

As we've seen recently, a hollowed-out company can push along for some time so long as no one takes a good look at the books or calls in their loans. But when it happens the fall can be dramatic.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

I think he's dead on. One major event in Iraq or at home could see his numbers plummet to the levels where only the hard-core wingnuts are still on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I SO agreed with this
when I read it this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So did I
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
west michigan Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. A structural problem
A worthy read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoVet Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent analysis
He managed to articulate a sense of this that I've had but was unable to put into words: that this whole thing was being run on the "hope model", the PNAC'ers knowing that they had no evidence to back up their allegations but hoping that a rose-petal-shower welcome from the liberated Iraqis and discovery of stocks of WMD's would validate their case, "See, we told you". That was the anticipated future return, and it has failed to materialize now that it's time to pay the piper. Marshall's metaphor can be taken one step further: when it's time to pay up and you don't have the do-re-mi, you're bankrupt, the same as PNAC's policy of global domination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Love the identification of the "Hope Model"
Edited on Thu Sep-25-03 12:58 PM by RobertSeattle
As we would say in the Army, "Hope is not a Plan".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoVet Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Or this:
Fail to plan and you plan to fail. This whole operation should be called the "Mother of all Ratfucks".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Mometum" is everything in campaigns. Bush's is going down fast n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I've said for many months..
...that when the American public was presented with a candidate who would make them feel safer than the Commander in Chief, Bush's numbers would be in freefall.

Wes Clark, the authentic grownup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Junior Was Marketed Using A HARD SELL
The American consumers have simply become sick of his brand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC