Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the greens candidate impressed me most

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dudeness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:30 PM
Original message
the greens candidate impressed me most
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 11:30 PM by dudeness
having just watched the "debate"..I came out feeling that the "greens" certainly have a future in your political system..I see that as a positive in a democratic society..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Girlfriday Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. smart and polite
That what Camejo is.

I liked him but will stick with Bustamante
who I thought also handled the fray well.

If we get automatic run off voting the Green
party could really move up but until that day
Democratic is the only vote that counts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen from OH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Wha??? Okay, so I only flipped between the debate
and the World Poker Championship (which was FABULOUS,if anyone wants to know) but from the bits I saw he was interruptive and annoying as hell.

eileen from (And I never thought I'd say this) Ohio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It was 90 minutes long...
I guess it was the part you missed.

Interupt factor:

AS: 9
TM: 2
PC: 3
AH: 8
CB: 2

He was in the lower range for "interruptive and annoying"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. He was pretty annoying - agree with you n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haymaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Again, were you conscious?
What debate were you watching?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haymaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Puufuckinlease...
Which debate did you watch? That is, when you stopped watching that bullshit poker?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minkyboodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. ??
Edited on Thu Sep-25-03 01:19 AM by minkyboodle
I watched most of the debate and it seemed that Camejo, McClintock and Bustamante were the only ones that even mildy followed and respected the rules of the debate. Arianna (bless her for it thogh) and Ahnuld were the biggest interruptors.
Scott
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_NorCal_D_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
27. I noticed that
Camejo was lucky.

He wasn't attacked once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Didn't see the debate but it would be a much bettter world if we elected
a few, or make that many, greens. I also wish we had a multiple party system. It would solve so many of the money issues that drive most campaigns. I know, I dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I thought he came across as the only truly real guy
And Arianna was in "attack Arnold" mode and couldn't get her claws retracted or the paw out of her mouth. Cruz was snooty and sanctimonious. Arnold was as coherent and attractive as a belligerent drunk. McClintock looked like a simmering, barely functioning Timothy McVeigh.

Camejo came across as reasonable, comforting and safe. A kind father type.

I think he did an excellent job of splitting the Democratic vote. And McClintockkk will attract the hard core and way right wing pubs to even it out.



Click Here To See Fair & Balanced Buttons, Stickers & Magnets!>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. me, too. Why can't we have Camejo/Cronkite ticket?

Regime Change!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Camejo has done well
Who knows...he might surprise 'em all! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm voting for him
I was before the debate, I'm dead sure I will after this debate. The only problem is that he wants to do too much as governor, but I feel he would do a magnificient job of it. He really should run for Congress, he would do well there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. well YOU at least will deserve to have Arnold for Gov...... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. I guess you forget Davis caused all this mess
by being so freaking unpopular!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. Don't agree - he was very shrill at the beginning - had a few
really great moments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'm leaning toward Camejo,
Edited on Thu Sep-25-03 12:28 AM by GrandmaBear
and away from Bustamante. Camejo did appear genuine, and made sense. I move back and forth between "anyone but Ahnold," and "vote your conscience," and "vote for the one who can win." Camejo moved me tonight closer to voting my conscious conscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cloud Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yeah
Just go with the guy you like best. You don't have to necessarily vote no on recall yes on Bustamante like everyone says. There are a few good canidates out there.

I don't live in California but if I did I would vote no on recall yes on Camejo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. Multiple issues.
Too bad you're not in California. Voting NO ON RECALL is important message to those who are trying to buy this governorship.

Voting for your candidate of choice is important in case they succeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eablair3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. camejo won
without a doubt, imho

he was impressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. were we watching the same debate???
Arianna won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dudeness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. I can presume we did..jane
this is only my humble opinion..feel free to differ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. what debate were you watching?
Arianna was attacking AHH-nold all night. Hard to "win" a debate when all you're trying to do is attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haymaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
17. I have to say that he wasn't bad.
And everyone else was, save Buster, who tried as best he could to stay out of the fray, which proved impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dudeness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. I guess it was the universal health care and taxing
the rich that swung me..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
23. Most pundits gave the highest marks to Camejo and McClintock
Most commentators I've seen this evening have given the highest marks to McClintock and Camejo. I tend to concur. Bustamante didn't really hurt himself, but he could have done better. The same can be said of Arianna.

Arnold lost this evening and McClintock benefitted from it. It wouldn't surprise me if McClintock finished ahead of Schwarzenegger on election day.

To be honest, if the race were just between the two of them, I'd go for McClintock. I'd have to hold my nose while voting for someone so far to the right; nevertheless, I would trust him with the day-to-day matters of running the state far more than I would trust Schwarzenegger.

As for the recall question, it will be close. A few eeks ago, Davis looked doomed.

Nothing said tonight changed my mind. I'll vote No on the recall question and for Bustamante as the replacement. However, if all things were equal or if we simply had IRV, I'd vote for Camejo.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
26. I hate myself for saying it . . .
But if I were conducting job interviews with those candidates, the only one I would hire is McClintock.

I need a shower.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyskye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
28. I was quite surprised
Edited on Thu Sep-25-03 10:53 AM by Greyskye
I watched 99% of the debate last night - missed a few minutes as my wife was in class so I had to get the small's dinner ready. :)

My exposure to the candidates pre-debate was this:
Arnold (R)- I've watched his movies.
Senator McClintock (sp?) (R)- Never heard him speak, knew nothing of his personal platform.
Peter Camejo (Green) - Never heard him speak, slightly familiar with the Green platform.
Arianna (I) - Familiar with her writings since her conversion from the Dark Side, like what I've read.
Cruz (D) - Never heard him speak before, was my personal front-runner pre-debate.


My feelings post-debate are thus:
Arnold - Courtesy, in my opinion, is a definining feature of the character of a person. Someone who lacks all pretensions of courtesy has, IMHO, fatal character flaws which will show in other ways as well. Arnold's steam-rolling over any and all in his way showed me his true character - and there isn't any. :(

McClintock - Professional, articulate. If I didn't disagree with 85% of what comes out of his mouth, I'd have decent feelings about him.

Camejo - Articulate, passionate, and had solid ideas on just about every topic touched upon. He had the statistics to back up his views, and not a single member was able to disagree with anything that he said. No one attacked him, as I'm sure he was considered a non-contender by the rest of the candidates.

Arianna - Like Comejo, she was articulate and passionate. She was the only one who even came close to standing up to Arnold's motor-mouth, although that very thing probably lost her 'points' in this debate. And she had the best one-liner of the debate, when she was attempting to keep Arnold from interrupting and talking over her like he had been every other candidate: "I'll just keep talking and we'll see which person with the funny accent can keep going longer" (paraphrased, badly).

Cruz - Cruz, Cruz, Cruz. Seems like a genuinely nice guy, but this debate format was not good for him. I kept thinking back to the Bush-Gore debates, with the feeling that he was in the Gore role. Decent message, mostly well delivered, but his constant muttering of comments into the mic while other candidates talked wasn't as effective (sadly) as interrupting and taking over the conversation. Worst of all was when he fell into 'politician' mode. Speaking in glittering generalities was just not as effective as the specifics that some of the others had.


My opinion, at the end of it all, was that Peter Camejo had actually won the debate. Here is how I feel the rest of the candidates fell out:

2 - McClintock
3 - Arianna
4&5 - Cruz and Arnold


edits for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-03 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Thank you for your well thought out post,, but
I would disagree with you on why others did not attack Camejo. It may in part have been from not viewing him as a serious opponent. However, it also could have been that they just didn't have facts to use against him. He was well prepared and articulate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC