Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush, Iran And The Under-Reported Historical Record

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 02:36 PM
Original message
Bush, Iran And The Under-Reported Historical Record
Edited on Thu Jun-30-05 02:37 PM by cryingshame
Since Rove is having the Mediawhores focus on the ancient Iranian Hostage Crisis that swept NeoCons into power... just thought I'd dredge up some info on NeoCon thuggery regarding Iran.


October Surprise
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

October Surprise is the allegation (as well as the title of a book on the subject by Gary Sick) that representatives of the 1980 Ronald Reagan presidential campaign arranged the Iran-Contra deal well in advance of the 1980 election in which Ronald Reagan defeated Jimmy Carter.

The alleged conspiracy was to postpone the release of the hostages held by Iran until after the election, thus preventing an "October surprise" that would have aided Carter, the incumbent. The most public face of the story is that in October 1980, an agreement was reached, after long negotiations, to unfreeze Iran's monetary assets for the safe return of the hostages - but not until after Reagan's inauguration on January 20, 1981. In the event, the hostages were released minutes after Reagan was sworn in as President.


Details

Proponents of the theory, such as Barbara Honegger, a researcher and policy analyst with the 1980 Reagan/Bush campaign (interviewed in link), allege that William Casey and other representatives of the Reagan presidential campaign made a deal at two sets of meetings in July and August at the Ritz Hotel in Madrid with Iranians to delay the release of Americans held hostage in Iran until after the November 1980 presidential elections. The idea was that Reagan's opponent, the incumbent President Jimmy Carter, whose team had been negotiating, wouldn't gain a popularity boost (an 'October Surprise') before election day. The allegations included a date-specific allegation that William Casey met with an Iranian cleric in Madrid, Spain, and much of the tardy investigations have centered on whether, at the weekend in question he was actually at a Bohemian Grove retreat in California. Though William Casey was probably in London following the alleged meetings, critical pages of his daybook diary were unaccountably missing when the investigators came to look for them over a decade later.

Carter was at the time dealing with the Iran hostage crisis and the hostile regime of the Ayatollah Khomeini. Those who assert that a deal was made allege that certain Republicans with CIA connections, including George H. W. Bush, arranged to have the hostages held through October, until Reagan could defeat Carter in early November, and then be released. The hostages were in fact released on the very day of Reagan's inauguration, twenty minutes after his inaugural address. The timing of the release did not spark much press attention at the time.

Two months earlier, in a campaigning interview, Ronald Reagan had said that he had a "secret plan" involving the hostages. "My ideas require quiet diplomacy," he had responded when pressed, "where you don't have to say what it is you're thinking of doing."

A 1981 Congressional probe into the Reagan campaign's theft of White House briefing books on the eve of a presidential debate disclosed that Reagan campaign manager William Casey (later appointed as Director of Central Intelligence in the Reagan administration) was receiving highly classified reports on closely-held Carter administration intelligence on the Carter campaign and the Democratic president's efforts to liberate the hostages.


Chronology

Chronology:

* Sept. 22 (1980): Iraq invades Iran.
* Oct. 15-20: Meetings are held in Paris between emissaries of the Reagan-Bush campaign, with Mr. Casey as "key participant," and "high-level Iranian and Israeli representatives."
* Oct. 21: Iran, for reasons not explained, abruptly shifts its position in secret negotiations with the Carter administration and disclaims "further interest in receiving military equipment."
* Oct. 21-23: Israel secretly ships F-4 fighter-aircraft tires to Iran, in violation of the U.S. arms embargo, and Iran disperses the hostages to different locations.



Investigations

A PBS 'Frontline' documentary in 1990 brought a sound bite unavoidably to the surface in detail, as did a 15 April 1991 New York Times article by Gary Sick. In 1991, while playing golf with George Bush in Palm Springs, Ronald Reagan gave reporters a sound bite. In 1980, he had "tried some things the other way," that is, to free the hostages, he told them. When pressed he said that the details remained "classified." The remark was widely publicized and linked to Reagan's 1980 campaign remark undisclosed "secret plan" to free the hostages, with the unanswered question of how a Presidential candidate in 1980 had received "classified" information <1> (http://www.carpenoctem.tv/cons/october.html).

Separate House and Senate investigations were further delayed until 1992. William Casey, the alleged go-between, was dead by then, and it seemed impossible to account for all his moves during the summer of 1980, when he is said to have conferred with agents representing the Ayatollah Khomeini's government.

If the allegations are true, some believe that dealing with a hostile foreign government to achieve the defeat of a domestic administration would have been an act of treason.

According to Sick's theory, Oliver North was the administration's scapegoat, taking responsibility in order to conceal the "treason" of Reagan and Bush. A PBS documentary, "The Secret Government," hosted by Bill Moyers, detailed the "off the shelf, self-financing, independent covert operations" entity mentioned by North, and tracing it to its cold war beginnings won an Emmy for best documentary film.


See also

* George Bush family conspiracy theory
* Iran-Contra
* Iran hostage crisis

The issue of an October Surprise first came to light during an investigation by a House of Representatives Subcommittee into how the 1980 Reagan Campaign obtained debate briefing materials of then President Carter. During the investigation, the Subcommittee on Human Resources of the House Post Office and Civil Service Committee obtained access to Reagan Campaign documents and discovered numerous instances of documents and memorandum referencing a monitoring effort for any such October Surprise. The Subcommittee, Chaired by former US Rep. Donald Albosta (D-MI) issued a comprehensive report in 1984 describing each type of information that was detected and its possible source. There is a section in the report dedicated to the October Surprise issue.


References

* Abbie Hoffman and Johnathan Silvers, "An election held hostage," Playboy Magazine, October 1988
* Barbara Honegger, 1989. October Surprise. New York: Tudor. ISBN 0944276466.
* Robert Parry, 1993. Trick or Treason: The October Surprise Mystery. ISBN 187982308X.
* Robert Parry, 1996. The October Surprise X-Files: The Hidden Origins of the Reagan-Bush Era.
* Kevin Phillips, American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush.
* Gary Sick. 1991. October Surprise: America's Hostages in Iran and the Election of Ronald Reagan. New York: Random House. ISBN 0812919890.
* The "October Surprise" allegations and the circumstances surrounding the release of the American hostages held in Iran: Report of the Special Counsel ... eign Relations, United States Senate (S. prt). For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office; (1992)
* Joint report of the Task Force to Investigate Certain Allegations Concerning the Holding of American Hostages by Iran in 1980 ("October Surprise Task Force") (SuDoc Y 1.1/8:102-1102) by U.S. Congressional Budget Office
* Rules of the Task Force to Investigate Certain Allegations Concerning the Holding of American Hostages by Iran in 1980 ("October Surprise Task Force") by United States
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phoebe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. worth repeating yet again - according to Bloomberg News
Edited on Thu Jun-30-05 03:14 PM by phoebe
Marvin Bush is partnering with Chatterjee Group - wonder what his cut is??

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=a6lORFYlGbrg&refer=top_world_news

BASF, Shell to Sell Basell to Access, Chatterjee (Update3)
May 5 (Bloomberg) -- BASF AG and Royal Dutch/Shell Group agreed to sell their Basell NV plastics joint venture for 4.4 billion euros ($5.7 billion) to Access Industries Inc. of the U.S. and The Chatterjee Group, bowing to U.S. pressure not to hand the company to Iran.

Access and Chatterjee won the bidding for Hoofdorpp, Netherlands-based Basell, BASF, the world's largest chemical maker, and Shell, Europe's No. 2 oil company, said in a statement. The unit is the world's largest maker of polypropylene, used in bottle caps, grocery bags and packaging.

The U.S. State Department pressured BASF and Shell to ignore interest from Iran, which the U.S. lists as a state sponsor of terrorism. By exiting the five-year-old Basell, Shell and BASF will reduce their exposure to low-margin commodity plastics. Closely held Access and Indian entrepreneur Purnendu Chatterjee will get control of a company with annual sales of 6.7 billion euros, debt of 2.2 billion euros and 6,600 employees.

snip

``If the Indians offer the same money as the Iranians it gets you less grief with the U.S., then that's a politically expedient thing to do,'' said Richard Griffith, a London-based analyst at Williams de Broe.


Here's more - apparently Marvin AND Jeb are partners...

http://www.independent-media.tv/itemprint.cfm?fmedia_id...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's hear it for the HISTORICAL RECORD and its keepers.
Edited on Thu Jun-30-05 03:19 PM by blm
Thank you, cs.

Also of interest should be Colin Powell's recommendation that the COURTS DROP THE CASE of the hostages who sought compensation from Iran for their ordeal.

The Iran hostages were pissed that BushInc would interfere in their case and weigh in against them the way they did.

Why did BushInc not want the court case against Iran to continue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh, Nice Nugget. Didn't Remember That. Must Not Have Gotten Much Air Play
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Suppression of evidence is obstruction of justice.
And that's precisely what these bastards did in denying those men their civil suit. But, hey, these bastards have gotten away with so many crimes it makes my head swim.

If the Democrats take back Congress, they had better push these pricks permanently out of the political picture. My advice: "STOP BEING NICE TO THE ASSHOLES! Please."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC