Hopsicker, Madsen, Ruppert; defenders & detractors, come forward!

[reprehensor]

At times I find these writers very enlightening.

However, Hopsicker believes 19 hijackers really did the deed, even though a bunch of them are still alive. (Google it ya-self!)

Madsen can be very analytical, but after the '04 elections, he wrote articles about election fraud that would make Drudge blush. (Yes, Shrubco probably did steal '04 too, but something smells of disinfo to me. I'll stick with Conyers.)

Here's the weird thing about Ruppert, (yes, I know his history as a CRACK the CIA guy), two days after 9/11, he's saying;

"Based upon a detailed review of an interview with a NY architect who is expert on high rise construction and upon today's BBC story which I have linked at the bottom of this page, I am now virtually certain that there were no explosives placed within the WTC buildings."

While most people were still shaking the debris from their battered cognitive functions, Ruppert is there to reassure us that, 'No worries! No demolition here! Nothing to see! Move along!'

What is up with that?

I have enough trouble squeezing the truth droplets from the MSM.

But do I have my Red Herring detector set too high?

[mirandapriestly]

1. I'm reading Ruppert's Crossing The Rubicon now.

It's taking me a long time. I didn't know he say that about the demolition. There is a lot of interesting stuff about peak oil, though.