Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

hate to do this, but

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:41 PM
Original message
hate to do this, but
got a constructive idea from the FreePuke site. Actually, they seem to like to put up an entire article (not snipped like here) and then go off against it.

It was an article from the Oregonian. Anyway, here it is...


Put a cap on war-based hyper-profits
The Oregonian ^ | 09/23/03 | Robert Landauer

Congress did it in World War I.

And in World War II.

Again in the Korean War.

Why not now?

The United States is at war in Iraq, in Afghanistan and globally against terrorism. President Bush confirms the ventures' seriousness by asking Congress for an extra $87 billion of military- and reconstruction-related funding plus $41.3 billion for the Department of Homeland Security.

<snip>

...An excess-profits-tax bill should be introduced into the House of Representatives and acted on without delay. No war-related contract should be awarded or extended without provisions indicating that the deal will be subject to any excess-profits ceilings that Congress enacts. Robert Landauer: 503-221-8157, or 1320 S.W. Broadway, Portland, OR 97201 or robertlandauer@news.oregonian.com

It seems like a valid thing to do. Even "patriotic."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is a good idea.
To me, war profits seem like blood money. But there are interests on the other side who feel that war profits should be completely unregulated. Having a cap is a compromise, splitting the difference between those two points of view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. That would work if
the white house wasn't keeping all the documents secret .
They won't disclose how the contracts were drawn up.
They say it's a secret, and the reason it's secret is secret.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wouldn't be completely surprised
if Halliburton, et al, are getting this money tax-free. If not, I'm sure * has instituted enough loopholes to write it all off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Of course it's tax free ~ Halliburton is a foreign Corp. It's office is in
The Cayman Islands. It pays no US Taxes. Cheney was CEO when it moved it's offices offshore to evade taxes. Very few big GOP donars are American Corporations. They all are offshore. Patriots all thru and thru.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. I bet it could be done
Most GOP are no richer than we are, and it is just that super rice guys that make out anyhow. Both Dem and Rep are getting pink slips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC