It was delicious selecting and highlighting excerpts in this piece.
*************QUOTE****
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/22/AR2005062202301.htmlHillary Clinton Attacked by Man From MarsBy Tina Brown
Maybe it's a secret
fantasy of girl-on-girl action that makes Ed Klein obsess about Sen. Hillary Clinton's supposed lesbian ethos in his new book "The Truth About Hillary." It's
hard to know what else he has to draw on.
Yelling "lesbian" at powerful heterosexual women has always been the pathetic projection of the menaced male, but it's especially baffling in Klein's case. As the former editor of the New York Times Magazine, with some bestsellers behind him,
Klein used to be a workmanlike scribe with glamour aspirations when he was flat-footing around in the Jackie O crypto-sphere. He's
not the usual sniper in the Republican stage army, which is perhaps why such paid-up members as the New York Post's John Podhoretz have elected to play smart and trash the book, too. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that
misogyny is a sure boomerang.
In New York, "The Truth About Hillary" is having the unintended result of inspiring female solidarity. At a fancy all-girls lunch party on Fifth Avenue on Tuesday for, in Kleinspeak, the Powerful Network of Women who control the dinner access in Manhattan,
"Ed Slime" was a withering topic of conversation, which seems to have been good news for his Amazon listing.
Every time Klein describes anyone female in Hillary Clinton's circle,
you hear the clump clump clump of stereotype-lesbian footwear. ....
...but this
doesn't seem in character for Klein. In my experience when he wrote for me at Vanity Fair,
he was motivated only by success. In those days I appreciated
his zesty pursuit of headline stories, even when he was totally unqualified to write them. A Klein hazard, however, was a
Clouseau-like imperviousness to social temperature. I am afraid it was I who first assigned him to write a cover story about Jackie O in 1989 on the strength of his avowed friendship with the former first lady. Given her closely guarded privacy, it surprised me when
Klein reported that Mrs. Onassis was "perfectly amenable" to his writing the piece. "What did she say when you called her?" I asked. "She said,
'Oh Ed, give me a break,' " he replied.
At the Fifth Avenue girls' lunch, the question most asked was:
At what point is a successful woman
permitted to move on? If George W. Bush can be born again and be absolved for his dopey frat-boy past and eat his National Guard records, when does Hillary get to slough off the ancient scaly legends of her relationship with Bill and the hoary old hide-and-seek of her Rose Law Firm files? Is there a statute of limitations on
how long we can go on pondering if the Clintons do or don't have a "real marriage," whatever that may be? Now that Hillary has proved such a creditable senator in her own right, will there ever come a time when she doesn't have to prove that her pain over her husband's infidelities was "authentic"?
There is something so passe about
bio-porn, even in the service of political gut-shooting. ....
*******************UNQUOTE**********